Bayroff, A. G., Thomas, J. J., & Anderson, A. A.. (1960). Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.

Bayliss, M. S., Dewey, J. E., Dunlap, I., & et. al.,. (2003). A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey: The Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 953-961.

Baumer, M., Roded, K., & Gafni, N.. (2009). Assessing the equivalence of Internet-based vs. paper-and-pencil psychometric tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Bartroff, J., Finkelman, M., & Lai, T. L.. (2008). Modern sequential analysis and its application to computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 73, 473-486.

Barthel, D., Otto, C., Nolte, S., Meyrose, A. - K., Fischer, F., Devine, J., et al.. (2017). The validation of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in a clinical sample: study design, methods and first results of the Kids-CAT study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1105–1117. presented at the May. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1437-9

Barrada, J. R., Veldkamp, B. P., & Olea, J.. (2006). Multiple maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the SMABS-EAM Conference. Budapest, Hungary.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2009). Item selection rules in computerized adaptive testing: Accuracy and security. Methodology, 5, 7-17.

Barrada, J. R., Abad, F. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2009). Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 21, 313-320. presented at the May.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2009). Test overlap rate and item exposure rate as indicators of test security in CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Barrada, J. R., Veldkamp, B. P., & Olea, J.. (2009). Multiple Maximum Exposure Rates in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 58-73. doi:10.1177/0146621608315329

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2007). Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2010). A Method for the Comparison of Item Selection Rules in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 438-452. doi:10.1177/0146621610370152

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J.. (2008). Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 618-625.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2008). Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 493-513.

Barrada, J. R., Mazuela, P., & Olea, J.. (2006). Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 18, 156-159. presented at the Feb.

Barnard, J. J. (2022). Improving Precision of CAT Measures. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Test-ing, 9(1), 1-7. presented at the 10/2022. doi:10.7333/2210-0901001

Barnard, J. J. (2018). From Simulation to Implementation: Two CAT Case Studies. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 23(14). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=23&n=14

Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001

Ban, J. C., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2000). Effects of nonequivalence of item pools on ability estimates in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Ban, J. - C., Hanson, B. A., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2002). Data sparseness and on-line pretest item calibration-scaling methods in CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 207-218.

Ban, J., Wang, T., & Yi, Q.. (1999). Comparison of the a-stratified method, the Sympson-Hetter method, and the matched difficulty method in CAT administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.

Ban, J. C., Hanson, B. A., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.

Ban, J., Hanson, B. A., Yi, Q., & Harris, D.. (2001). Data sparseness and online pretest calibration/scaling methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle.

Balajthy, E. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.

Baghi, H., Ferrara, S. F., & Gabrys, R.. (1992). Student attitudes toward computer-adaptive test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Baghi, H., Gabrys, R., & Ferrara, S.. (1991). Applications of computer-adaptive testing in Maryland. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Baek, S. G. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model for attitude measurement. In . M. Wilson, G. Engelhard Jr and K. Draney (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice, volume 4. Norwood NJ: Ablex.

Baek, S. G. (1995). Computerized adaptive attitude testing using the partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 55(7-A), 1922 (UMI No. AAM9430378).

Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J.. (2012). Termination Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Tests: Do Variable-Length CATs Provide Efficient and Effective Measurement?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1212-0101001

Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Termination criteria in computerized adaptive tests: Variable-length CATs are not biased. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Auger, R. (1989). Étude de praticabilité du testing adaptatif de maîtrise des apprentissages scolaires au Québec : une expérimentation en éducation économique secondaire 5. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Montréal : Université du Québec à Montréal. [In French].

Auger, R. (1992). Le testing adaptatif avec interprétation critérielle, une expérience de praticabilité du TAM pour l’évaluation sommative des apprentissages au Québec.. (S. P. Seguin)Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 15-1 et 2.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation.,. (1996). Users manual for the MicroCAT testing system, Version 3.5. St Paul MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation,. (2001). The FastTEST Professional Testing System, Version 1.6 [Computer software]. St. Paul MN: Author.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation,. (1988). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System, Version 3. St. Paul MN: Author.

Assessment-Systems-Corporation,. (1984). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System. St. Paul MN: Author.

Arrowwood, V. E. (1994). Effects of computerized adaptive test anxiety on nursing licensure examinations. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences), 54 (9-A), 3410.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J.. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.

Armstrong, R. D., & Little, J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J. J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple stage adaptive tests with discrete items. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council Report.

Armstrong, R. D., & Roussos, L.. (2003). A method to determine targets for multi-stage adaptive tests. Unpublished manuscript.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., & Berliner, N.. (1998). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J.. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multiple-Form Structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164. doi:10.1177/0146621604263652

Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J.. (2004). A study of multiple stage adaptive test designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H.. (1998). Computer adaptive testing – Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.

Armitage, P. (1950). Sequential analysis with more than two alternative hypotheses, and its relation to discriminant function analysis, 12, 137-144.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). Optimal Testlet Pool Assembly for Multistage Testing Designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 204-215. doi:10.1177/0146621605284350

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2004). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Archer, R. P., Tirrell, C. A., & Elkins, D. E.. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.

Arce-Ferrer, A. J., & Martínez Guzmán, E.. (2009). Studying the Equivalence of Computer-Delivered and Paper-Based Administrations of the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 855-867. doi:10.1177/0013164409332219

Arbiyah, N. (2017). Construction of Gratitude Scale Using Polytomous Item Response Theory Model. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pHhO4cq2-wh24ht3nBAoXNHv7234_mjH

Angoff, W. H. Huddleston, E. M. (1958). The multi-level experiment: A study of a two-level test system for the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Andrich, D. (1995). Review of the book Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. Psychometrika, 4?, 615-620.

Andres, P. L., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M.. (2004). Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.

Anderson, D. (1999). Use of conditional item exposure methodology for an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Anatchkova, M. D., Saris-Baglama, R. N., Kosinski, M., & Bjorner, J. B.. (2009). Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 10, 932-943. presented at the Sep.

Anastasi, A. (1953). An empirical study of the applicability of sequential analysis to item selection, 13, 3-13.

American-Council-on-Education.,. (1995). Guidelines for computer-adaptive test development and use in education. Washington DC: Author.

Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.