Export 2297 results:
2020
Kaplan, M., & de la Torre, J.. (2020). A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 49-64. doi:10.1177/0146621619835500
Han, K. T. (2020). Framework for Developing Multistage Testing With Intersectional Routing for Short-Length Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 87-102. doi:10.1177/0146621619837226
Wang, C., Chen, P., & Jiang, S.. (2020). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241
He, Y., Chen, P., & Li, Y.. (2020). New Efficient and Practicable Adaptive Designs for Calibrating Items Online. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 3-16. doi:10.1177/0146621618824854
Yang, L., & Reckase, M. D.. (2020). The Optimal Item Pool Design in Multistage Computerized Adaptive Tests With the p-Optimality Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80, 955-974. doi:10.1177/0013164419901292
Yang, J., Chang, H. - H., Tao, J., & Shi, N.. (2020). Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 346-361. doi:10.1177/0146621619893783
Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
PDF icon Kingsbury and Wise-Final FINAL.pdf (516.77 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
PDF icon Kingsbury and Wise-Final FINAL.pdf (516.77 KB)
2019
Wang, W., & Kingston, N.. (2019). Adaptive Testing With a Hierarchical Item Response Theory Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 51-67. doi:10.1177/0146621618765714
Mao, X., Zhang, J., & Xin, T.. (2019). Application of Dimension Reduction to CAT Item Selection Under the Bifactor Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 419-434. doi:10.1177/0146621618813086
Yigit, H. D., Sorrel, M. A., & de la Torre, J.. (2019). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 388-401. doi:10.1177/0146621618798665
Han, K. T., Dimitrov, D. M., & Al-Mashary, F.. (2019). Developing Multistage Tests Using D-Scoring Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 988-1008. doi:10.1177/0013164419841428
Reckase, M., Ju, U., & Kim, S.. (2019). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2019). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 335-357. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
Hsu, C. - L., & Wang, W. - C.. (2019). Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Non-Compensatory Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 464-480. doi:10.1177/0146621618800280
Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C.. (2019). Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 543-561. doi:10.1177/0146621618813113
Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
2018
Bengs, D., Brefeld, U., & Kröhne, U.. (2018). Adaptive Item Selection Under Matroid Constraints. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(2), 15-36. doi:10.7333/1808-0602015
Li, J., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2018). A Comparison of Constraint Programming and Mixed-Integer Programming for Automated Test-Form Generation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 435-456. doi:10.1111/jedm.12187
Diao, Q., & Ren, H.. (2018). Constructing Shadow Tests in Variable-Length Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 538-552. doi:10.1177/0146621617753736
Huebner, A., Wang, C., Daly, B., & Pinkelman, C.. (2018). A Continuous a-Stratification Index for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 523-537. doi:10.1177/0146621618758289
Barnard, J. J. (2018). From Simulation to Implementation: Two CAT Case Studies. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 23(14). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=23&n=14
Xiong, X. (2018). A Hybrid Strategy to Construct Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 630-643. doi:10.1177/0146621618762739
Spoden, C., Frey, A., & Bernhardt, R.. (2018). Implementing Three CATs Within Eighteen Months. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(3), 38-55. presented at the 09/2018. doi:10.7333/1809-060338
Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2018). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 0013164418790634. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
Tu, D., Han, Y., Cai, Y., & Gao, X.. (2018). Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomously Scored Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 677-694. doi:10.1177/0146621618762748
Xu, H., Fang, G., Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z.. (2018). Latent Class Analysis of Recurrent Events in Problem-Solving Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 478-498. doi:10.1177/0146621617748325
PDF icon PRO_multidimmatters_APM.pdf (894.8 KB)
Liu, S., Cai, Y., & Tu, D.. (2018). On-the-Fly Constraint-Controlled Assembly Methods for Multistage Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 595-613. doi:10.1111/jedm.12194
Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Böhnke, J. R.. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1055–1063. presented at the Apr. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1821-8
PDF icon MCAT_commentary.pdf (847.26 KB)
Luo, X., & Kim, D.. (2018). A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174
Gierl, M. J., & Lai, H.. (2018). Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788
Sari, H. Ibrahim, & Raborn, A.. (2018). What Information Works Best?: A Comparison of Routing Methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 499-515. doi:10.1177/0146621617752990
2017
Morin, M. (2017). Adapting Linear Models for Optimal Test Design to More Complex Test Specifications. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
van Buuren, N., Straat, H., Eggen, T., & Fox, J. - P.. (2017). Adaptive Item and Feedback Selection in Personalized Learning with a Network Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Schouwstra, S. (2017). Adaptivity in a Diagnostic Educational Test. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Maslak, A., & Pozdniakov, S.. (2017). Analysis of CAT Precision Depending on Parameters of the Item Pool. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bwe58kOQRgCSbB8x6OdZTDK4OIm3LQI3/view?usp=drive_web
Zheng, C., & Wang, C.. (2017). Application of Binary Searching for Item Exposure Control in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 561-576. doi:10.1177/0146621617707509
Donadello, I., Spoto, A., Sambo, F., Badaloni, S., Granziol, U., & Vidotto, G.. (2017). ATS-PD: An Adaptive Testing System for Psychological Disorders. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 792-815. doi:10.1177/0013164416652188
van der Linden, W. J., Jiang, B., Ren, H., Choi, S. W., & Diao, Q.. (2017). Bayesian Perspectives on Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Imai, S. (2017). Is CAT Suitable for Automated Speaking Test?. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Meng, H., & Han, C.. (2017). Comparison of Pretest Item Calibration Methods in a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Seo, D. Gi. (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing
Ling, G., Attali, Y., Finn, B., & Stone, E. A.. (2017). Is a Computerized Adaptive Test More Motivating Than a Fixed-Item Test?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0146621617707556
Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C.. (2017). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Pages