. (2010).
Effect of altering passing score in CAT when unidimensionality is violated. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April, New York NY.
. (1996). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: UIRT versus MIRT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.
. (1995). Using constraints to develop and deliver adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Computer-Assisted Testing Conference.
. (2000). ab00-01.pdf (45.6 KB)Mokken Scale Analysis Using Hierarchical Clustering Procedures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 332-354. doi:10.1177/0146621604265510
. (2004). The use of unidimensional parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 13-24.
. (1991). The use of unidimensional item parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing (No. 87-13). ACT Research Reports (p. 33). presented at the September, 1987, Iowa City, IA: ACT.
. (1987). The Use of Unidimensional Parameter Estimates of Multidimensional Items in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(1), 13-24.
. (1991). v15n1p013.pdf (1.06 MB)Adaptive testing, information, and the partial credit model. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne, Center for the Study of Higher Education.
. (1987). The construction of customized two-staged tests, 27, 241-253.
. (1990). . (2005).
Computerized Adaptive Testing in Early Education: Exploring the Impact of Item Position Effects on Ability Estimation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 437-451. doi:10.1111/jedm.12215
. (2019). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.
. (2008). Analysis of experimental CAT ASVAB data. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.
. (1984). . (1999).
Guidelines for computer-adaptive test development and use in education. Washington DC: Author.
. (1995). . (1953).
Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 10, 932-943. presented at the Sep.
. (2009). Use of conditional item exposure methodology for an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.
. (2004). . (1995).
The multi-level experiment: A study of a two-level test system for the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1958). Construction of Gratitude Scale Using Polytomous Item Response Theory Model. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pHhO4cq2-wh24ht3nBAoXNHv7234_mjH
. (2017). Studying the Equivalence of Computer-Delivered and Paper-Based Administrations of the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 855-867. doi:10.1177/0013164409332219
. (2009). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.
. (2001). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ar03-01.pdf (394.73 KB)Optimal Testlet Pool Assembly for Multistage Testing Designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 204-215. doi:10.1177/0146621605284350
. (2006). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.
. (2004). . (1950).
A method to determine targets for multi-stage adaptive tests. Unpublished manuscript.
. (2003). ar03-03.pdf (206.25 KB)Computerized adaptive testing with multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
. (1998). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multiple-Form Structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164. doi:10.1177/0146621604263652
. (2004). A study of multiple stage adaptive test designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
. (2004). ar04-01.pdf (287.44 KB)Computer adaptive testing – Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.
. (1998). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.
. (2004). The assembly of multiple form structures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ar03-02.pdf (417.41 KB)The assembly of multiple stage adaptive tests with discrete items. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council Report.
. (2003). Effects of computerized adaptive test anxiety on nursing licensure examinations. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences), 54 (9-A), 3410.
. (1994). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System, Version 3. St. Paul MN: Author.
. (1988). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System. St. Paul MN: Author.
. (1984). The FastTEST Professional Testing System, Version 1.6 [Computer software]. St. Paul MN: Author.
. (2001). Users manual for the MicroCAT testing system, Version 3.5. St Paul MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.
. (1996). Étude de praticabilité du testing adaptatif de maîtrise des apprentissages scolaires au Québec : une expérimentation en éducation économique secondaire 5. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Montréal : Université du Québec à Montréal. [In French].
. (1989). Le testing adaptatif avec interprétation critérielle, une expérience de praticabilité du TAM pour l’évaluation sommative des apprentissages au Québec.. ( )Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 15-1 et 2.
. (1992). Termination criteria in computerized adaptive tests: Variable-length CATs are not biased. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09babcock.pdf (280.59 KB)Termination Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Tests: Do Variable-Length CATs Provide Efficient and Effective Measurement?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1212-0101001
. (2012). Computerized adaptive attitude testing using the partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 55(7-A), 1922 (UMI No. AAM9430378).
. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model for attitude measurement. In . M. Wilson, G. Engelhard Jr and K. Draney (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice, volume 4. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
. (1997). Applications of computer-adaptive testing in Maryland. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (1991). Student attitudes toward computer-adaptive test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1992). . (2002).
A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.
. (2001). Data sparseness and online pretest calibration/scaling methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle.
. (2001). Effects of nonequivalence of item pools on ability estimates in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). ba00-01.pdf (656.37 KB)Data sparseness and on-line pretest item calibration-scaling methods in CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 207-218.
. (2002). Comparison of the a-stratified method, the Sympson-Hetter method, and the matched difficulty method in CAT administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.
. (1999). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001
. (2015). Improving Precision of CAT Measures. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Test-ing, 9(1), 1-7. presented at the 10/2022. doi:10.7333/2210-0901001
. (2022). From Simulation to Implementation: Two CAT Case Studies. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 23(14). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=23&n=14
. (2018). Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.
. (2007). ba07014.pdf (398.44 KB)