Siebens, H., Andres, P. L., Pengsheng, N., Coster, W. J., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Glas, C. A. W., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2018). Measuring patient-reported outcomes adaptively: Multidimensionality matters!. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621617733954

Weiss, D. J., & Von Minden, S.. (2011). Measuring Individual Growth With Conventional and Adaptive Tests. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 2(1), 80-101.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Hambleton, R. K., Montpetit, K., et al.. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.

May, K., & Nicewander, W. A.. (1998). Measuring change conventionally and adaptively. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 882-897.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Ludlow, L. H., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2006). Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.

Wang, W. - C., & Chen, B. - H.. (2001). Measurement efficiency of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. San Francisco CA.

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (In Press). Measurement efficiency for fixed-precision multidimensional computerized adaptive tests: Comparing health measurement and educational testing using example banks. Applied Psychological Measurement.

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (2019). Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 68-83. doi:10.1177/0146621618765719

Cheng, Y., & Chang, H. - H.. (2009). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-83. presented at the May.

Han, K. T. (2016). Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method With Fences for Short-Length Tests and Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 289-301. doi:10.1177/0146621616631317

Barrada, J. R., Mazuela, P., & Olea, J.. (2006). Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 18, 156-159. presented at the Feb.

Bickel, P., Buyske, S., Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2001). On maximizing item information and matching difficulty with ability. Psychometrika, 66, 69-77.

Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A.. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.

Jones, D. H. (1997). Mathematical programming approaches to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Verschoor, A. J., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M.. (2010). MATHCAT: A Flexible Testing System in Mathematics Education for Adults. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 137-150). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Glas, C. A. W., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2010). Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 603-26.

McBride, J. R., & Tardrew, S. P.. (2002). Mapping the Development of Pre-reading Skills with STAR Early Literacy. In Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. Chicago.

Von Tonder, M., & Claasswn, N. C. W.. (1992). Manual for the General Scholastic Aptitude Test (Senior) Computerized adaptive test. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

Weiss, D. J., & Guyer, R. D.. (2010). Manual for CATSim: Comprehensive simulation of computerized adaptive testing. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.

Guo, F. (1999). Managing CAT item development in the face of uncertainty. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Smith, R. L., Rizavi, S., Paez, R., Damiano, M., & Herbert, E.. (2003). Maintaining scale in computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Patsula, L. N., & Steffen, M.. (1997). Maintaining item and test security in a CAT environment: A simulation study. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL).

Luecht, R. M., de Champlain, A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1998). Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 29-41.

Levine, M. L., Segall, D. O., & Williams, B. A.. (1997). Maintaining a CAT item pool with operational data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Lamos, J. P., & Waters, B. K.. (1977). A Low-Cost Terminal Usable for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Hontangas, P., Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J.. (2000). Los tests adaptativos informatizados en la frontera del siglo XXI: Una revisión [Computerized adaptive tests at the turn of the 21st century: A review]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 183-216.

Pohl, S. (2013). Longitudinal Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 447–468. doi:10.1111/jedm.12028

Rose, M., & Bezjak, A.. (2009). Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Quality of Life Research, 18, 125-36. presented at the Feb.

Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2008). Local Dependence in an Operational CAT: Diagnosis and Implications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 201–223. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00061.x

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1978). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.

Styles, I., & Andrich, D.. (1993). Linking the standard and advanced forms of the Ravens Progressive Matrices in both the paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive-testing formats. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 905-925.

Lawrence, I., & Feigenbaum, M.. (1997). Linking scores for computer-adaptive and paper-and-pencil administrations of the SAT (Research Report No 97-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Li, X., Becker, K., Gorham, J., & Woo, A.. (2009). Limiting item exposure for target difficulty ranges in a high-stakes CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF File, 1.

Vispoel, W. P., Hendrickson, A., Bleiler, T., Widiatmo, H., Shrairi, S., & Ihrig, D.. (1999). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Vispoel, W. P., Hendrickson, A. B., & Bleiler, T.. (2000). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 21-38.

Raîche, G., & Béland, A.. (1994). L'évaluation nationale individualisée et assistée par ordinateur [Large scale assessment: Tailored and computerized]. In Québec: Proceeding of the 14th Congress of the Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale. Montréal: Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale (AQPC).

Cook, K. F., Choi, S. W., Crane, P. K., Deyo, R. A., Johnson, K. L., & Amtmann, D.. (2008). Letting the CAT out of the bag: Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33, 1378-83. presented at the May 20.

Laurier, M. (1993). Les tests adaptatifs en langue seconde. Communication lors de la 16e session d’étude de l’ADMÉÉ à Laval. Montréal: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation.

Waters, B. K., & Lee, G. C.. (1982). Legal and political considerations in large-scale adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the 23rd conference of the Military Testing Association.

De Beer, M. (2000). Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT): User's Manual. Pretoria: UNISA.

De Beer, M. (2000). Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT): Technical Manual. Pretoria: UNISA.

Gonçalves, J. P., Aluisio, S. M., de Oliveira, L. H. M., & Oliveira Jr., O. N.. (2004). A Learning Environment for English for Academic Purposes Based on Adaptive Tests and Task-Based Systems. In J. C. Lester, Vicari, R. M., & Paraguaçu, F., Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. 3220, pp. 1-11). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_1

PITON-GONÇALVES, J., ALUISIO, S. M., MENDONCA, L. H., & NOVAES, O. O.. (2004). A learning environment for english for academic purposes based on adaptive tests and task-based systems. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. . Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Auger, R. (1992). Le testing adaptatif avec interprétation critérielle, une expérience de praticabilité du TAM pour l’évaluation sommative des apprentissages au Québec.. (S. P. Seguin)Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 15-1 et 2.

Raîche, G.. (2002). Le testing adaptatif [Adaptive testing]. In . D. R. Bertrand and J.G. Blais (Eds) : Les théories modernes de la mesure [Modern theories of measurement]. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Binet, A., & Simon, T.. (1908). Le development de lintelligence chez les enfants. LAnee Psychologique, 14, 1-94.

van Buuren, N., & Eggen, T. J. H. M.. (2017). Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022

Traub, R. E., & Lam, Y. R.. (1985). Latent structure and item sampling models for testing. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 19-48.

Xu, H., Fang, G., Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z.. (2018). Latent Class Analysis of Recurrent Events in Problem-Solving Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 478-498. doi:10.1177/0146621617748325

Bulut, O., & Cormier, D.. (2017). A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc

Janczewski, D., & Lowe, P.. (1992). The Language Training Division's computer adaptive reading proficiency test. Provo, UT: Language Training Division, Office of Training and Education.

Koppel, N. B. (2000). Lagrangian relaxation for constrained curve-fitting with binary variables: Applications in educational testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1063.

Muñiz, J.. (2005). La Validez desde una óptica psicométrica [Validity from a psychometric perspective]. Acta Comportamentalia, 13, 9-20.

Raîche, G.. (1994). La simulation de modèle sur ordinateur en tant que méthode de recherche : le cas concret de l’étude de la distribution d’échantillonnage de l’estimateur du niveau d’habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d’arrêt. Actes du 6e colloque de l‘Association pour la recherche au collégial. Montréal : Association pour la recherche au collégial, ARC.

Raîche, G.. (2002). La simulation d’un test adaptatif basé sur le modèle de Rasch [Simulation of a Rasch-based adaptive test]. Mesure et évaluation en éducation.

Rache, G. (2000). La distribution dchantillonnage en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux rgles darrt : selon lerreur type et selon le nombre ditems administrs [Sampling distribution of the proficiency estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping.. Doctoral thesis, Montreal: University of Montreal.

Wang, C., & Chang, H. - H.. (2009). Kullback-Leibler information in multidimensional adaptive testing: theory and application. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Doong, S. H. (2009). A Knowledge-Based Approach for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 530-558. doi:10.3102/1076998609336667

Nandakumar, R., Banks, J. C., & Roussos, L. A.. (2006). Kernel-smoothed DIF detection procedure for computerized adaptive tests (Computerized testing report 00-08). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.