Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1998). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 271-279.

Buyske, S. G. (1999). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.

Wiberg, M. (2003). An optimal design approach to criterion-referenced computerized testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 97-100.

Verschoor, A. (2011). Optimal Calibration Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2006). Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.

Segal, H. (1977). Operational Considerations in Implementing Tailored Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & De Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational Characteristics of Adaptive Testing Procedures Using the Graded Response Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 129-143.

Koch, W. R., & G., D. B.. (1986). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using partial credit scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 129-143.

Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Operational characteristics of a Rasch model tailored testing procedure when program parameters and item pool attributes are varied. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Patience, W. M.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Operational characteristics of a one-parameter tailored testing procedure. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, August 1980, 10, 66 (Ms No. 2104).

Gorham, W. A. (1976). Opening remarks. In . W. H. Gorham (Chair), Computers and testing: Steps toward the inevitable conquest (PS 76-1). Symposium presented at the 83rd annual convention of the APA, Chicago IL. Washington DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Developement Center.

Liu, S., Cai, Y., & Tu, D.. (2018). On-the-Fly Constraint-Controlled Assembly Methods for Multistage Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 595-613. doi:10.1111/jedm.12194

Zheng, Y., & Chang, H. - H.. (2015). On-the-Fly Assembled Multistage Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 104-118. doi:10.1177/0146621614544519

Bejar, I. I. (1999). On-the-fly adaptive tests: An application of generative modeling to quantitative reasoning. In Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Stahl, J., Shumway, R., Bergstrom, B., & Fisher, A.. (1997). On-line performance assessment using rating scales. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 1, 173-191.

Harmes, J. C., Kromrey, J. D., & Parshall, C. G.. (2001). Online item parameter recalibration: Application of missing data treatments to overcome the effects of sparse data conditions in a computerized adaptive version of the MCAT. Unpublished manuscript.

Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z.. (2015). Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 5-15. doi:10.1177/0146621613513065

Chang, Y. I., & Lu, H. Y.. (2010). Online calibration via variable length computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 75, 140-157.

Guo, F., Stone, E., & Cruz, D.. (2001). On-line Calibration Using PARSCALE Item Specific Prior Method: Changing Test Population and Sample Size. In Paper presented at National Council on Measurement in Education Annual Meeting. Seattle, Washington.

Zheng, Y. (2016). Online Calibration of Polytomous Items Under the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 434-450. doi:10.1177/0146621616650406

Guo, F., & Wang, G.. (2003). Online calibration and scale stability of a CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2009). Obtaining reliable diagnostic information through constrained CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Cox, M. A. A. (2014). A Numerical Investigation of the Recovery of Point Patterns With Minimal Information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 329-335. doi:10.1177/0146621613516186

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). The null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 327-345.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). The null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 327-345.

Meijer, R. R., & Grégoire, J.. (2001). Nouveaux développements dans le domaine du testing informatisé [New developments in the area of computerized testing]. Psychologie Française, 46, 221-230.

Samejima, F. (2007). Nonparametric online item calibration. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. .

Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C.. (2019). Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 543-561. doi:10.1177/0146621618813113

Yi, Q,, & Nering, M.. (1998). Nonmodel-fitting responses and robust ability estimation in a realistic CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1997). Nonlinear sequential designs for logistic item response theory models with applications to computerized adaptive tests. The Annals of Statistics.

DeMars, C. E. (2022). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008

De Ayals, R. J. (1992). The Nominal Response Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 327-343.

de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.

Pommerich, M., Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (2009). The nine lives of CAT-ASVAB: Innovations and revelations. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Betz, N. E. (1975). New types of information and psychological implications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 32-43. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2011). A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 37-53. doi:10.1177/0013164410387338

Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2010). A new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 1-17. presented at the Dec 1.

von Davier, M., Cho, Y., & Pan, T.. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Wang, L. (2004). New methods for CBT item pool evaluation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). A new method of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Cronbach, L. J. (1966). New light on test strategy from decision theory. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.). Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.

Lau, C., & Wang, T.. (2000). A new item selection procedure for mixed item type in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.

Kaplan, M., de la Torre, J., & Barrada, J. R.. (2015). New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 167-188. doi:10.1177/0146621614554650

Thomasson, G. L. (1995). New item exposure control algorithms for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Weiss, D. J. (1983). New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing. New York: Academic Press.

He, Y., Chen, P., & Li, Y.. (2020). New Efficient and Practicable Adaptive Designs for Calibrating Items Online. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 3-16. doi:10.1177/0146621618824854

Park, J. (2007). A new delivery system for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Jacobson, R. L. (1993). New computer technique seen producing a revolution in testing. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 22-23, 26.

Wu, I. L. (2001). A new computer algorithm for simultaneous test construction of two-stage and multistage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 180-198.

Kuo, B. - C., & Chen, C. - H.. (2017). A New Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing for Simultaneously Diagnosing Skills and Misconceptions. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Wang, C., Weiss, D. J., Zhang, X., Tao, J., He, Y., Chen, P., et al.. (2017). New Challenges (With Solutions) and Innovative Applications of CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wvgxw7in_QCq_F7kzID6zCZuVXWcFDPa

Chen, S. - Y. (2001). A new approach to simulation studies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

McLeod, L. D., & Lewis, C.. (1998). A new approach for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Davey, T., & Parshall, C. G.. (1995). New algorithms for item selection and exposure control with computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Featherman, C. M., Subhiyah, R. G., & Hadadi, A.. (1996). New algorithms for item selection and exposure and proficiency estimation under 1- and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.

Kandula, S., Ancker, J. S., Kaufman, D. R., Currie, L. M., & Qing, Z. - T.. (2011). A new adaptive testing algorithm for shortening health literacy assessments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11(52). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-52

Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., Harmes, J. C., & Sentovich, C.. (2001). Nearest neighbors, simple strata, and probabilistic parameters: An empirical comparison of methods for item exposure control in CATs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Hendrickson, A. (2007). An NCME instructional module on multistage testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(2), 44-52.

Beeman, P. B., & Waterhouse, J. K.. (2001). NCLEX-RN performance: predicting success on the computerized examination. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17, 158-165. presented at the Jul-Aug.