Hahn, E. A., Cella, D., Bode, R. K., Gershon, R. C., & Lai, J. S.. (2006). Item banks and their potential applications to health status assessment in diverse populations. Medical Care, 44, S189-S197. presented at the Nov.

Ping, C., Shuliang, D., Haijing, L., & Jie, Z.. (2006). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.

Nandakumar, R., Banks, J. C., & Roussos, L. A.. (2006). Kernel-smoothed DIF detection procedure for computerized adaptive tests (Computerized testing report 00-08). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Barrada, J. R., Mazuela, P., & Olea, J.. (2006). Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 18, 156-159. presented at the Feb.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Ludlow, L. H., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2006). Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.

Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Fayers, P., Sprangers, M., & Bjorner, J. B.. (2006). Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30: basic developments and evaluations. Quality of Life Research, 15, 315-29. presented at the Apr.

Barrada, J. R., Veldkamp, B. P., & Olea, J.. (2006). Multiple maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the SMABS-EAM Conference. Budapest, Hungary.

Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2006). Multistage Testing: Widely or Narrowly Applicable?. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 257-260. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_6

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2006). Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393. doi:10.1177/0146621606288890

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). Optimal Testlet Pool Assembly for Multistage Testing Designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 204-215. doi:10.1177/0146621605284350

Teresi, J. A. (2006). Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications. Medical Care, 44, S39-49. presented at the Nov.

Haley, S. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., & Ni, P.. (2006). Sensitivity of a computer adaptive assessment for measuring functional mobility changes in children enrolled in a community fitness programme. Clin Rehabil, 20, 616-622.

Wiberg, M. (2006). Sequential Computerized Mastery Tests—Three Simulation Studies. International Journal of Testing, 6, 41-55. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0601_3

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2006). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.

Hart, D., Mioduski, J., Werenke, M., & Stratford, P.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947-956.

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., Werneke, M. W., & Stratford, P. W.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017

Hart, D. L., Cook, K. F., Mioduski, J. E., Teal, C. R., & Crane, P. K.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.

Hart, D. L., Cook, K. F., Mioduski, J. E., Teal, C. R., & Crane, P. K.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 290-8.

Núñez, R. M. N., & Pina, J. A. L.. (2006). Técnicas para detectar patrones de respuesta atípicos [Aberrant patterns detection methods]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 143-154.

Luecht, R., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA Examination. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 189-202. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_2

Frey, A. (2006). Validitätssteigerungen durch adaptives Testen [Increasing validity by adaptive testing].

McClarty, L. K., Sperling, R., & Dodd, B. G.. (2006). A variant of the progressive restricted item exposure control procedure in computerized adaptive testing systems based on the 3PL and the partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Raîche, G., Blais, J. G., & Magis, D.. (2007). Adaptive estimators of trait level in adaptive testing: Some proposals. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2007). Adaptive testing with the multi-unidimensional pairwise preference model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Fayers, P. M. (2007). Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: The challenges for health outcomes assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 187-194.

Breithaupt, K., & Hare, D. R.. (2007). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multistage Testlets for a High-Stakes Licensing Examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 5-20. doi:10.1177/0013164406288162

Papanastasiou, E. C., & Reckase, M. D.. (2007). A “Rearrangement Procedure” For Scoring Adaptive Tests with Review Options. International Journal of Testing, 7, 387-407. doi:10.1080/15305050701632262

Scalise, K., & Wilson, M.. (2007). Bundle models for computerized adaptive testing in e-learning assessment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Guo, F. (2007). CAT Security: A practitioner’s perspective. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Eggen, T. (2007). Choices in CAT models in the context of educational testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Eggen, T. (2007). Choices in CAT models in the context of educattional testing. In GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the June 7, 2007, St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admission Council.

Kim-Kang, G., & Weiss, D. J.. (2007). Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chen, S. - K. (2007). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.

Thompson, N. A. (2007). A comparison of two methods of polytomous computerized classification testing for multiple cutscores. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Forbey, J. D., & Ben-Porath, Y. S.. (2007). Computerized adaptive personality testing: A review and illustration with the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version. Psychological Assessment, 19, 14-24. presented at the Mar.

Jacobusse, G., & Buuren, S.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 2629-38. presented at the Jun 15.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.

Hol, M. A., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2007). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Polytomous Motivation Items: Administration Mode Effects and a Comparison With Short Forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429. doi:10.1177/0146621606297314

Weiss, D. J., & Gibbons, R. D.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing with the bifactor model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Zhou, J., Gierl, M. J., & Cui, Y.. (2007). Computerized attribute-adaptive testing: A new computerized adaptive testing approach incorporating cognitive psychology. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Thompson, N. A., & Ro, S.. (2007). Computerized classification testing with composite hypotheses. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Thompson, N. A., & Ro, S.. (2007). Computerized classification testing with composite hypotheses. GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admissions Council.

Mueller, K., Liebig, C., & Hattrup, K.. (2007). Computerizing Organizational Attitude Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 658-678. doi:10.1177/0013164406292084

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2007). Conditional Item-Exposure Control in Adaptive Testing Using Item-Ineligibility Probabilities. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 398-418. doi:10.3102/1076998606298044

Ro, S., & Thompson, N. A.. (2007). Cutscore location and classification accuracy in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Tokyo, Japan.

Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2007). The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers & Education, 49.

Reckase, M. D. (2007). The design of p-optimal item banks for computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF file, 211 KB}.

Gu, L., & Reckase, M. D.. (2007). Designing optimal item pools for computerized adaptive tests with Sympson-Hetter exposure control. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Parshall, C. G., & Harmes, J. C.. (2007). Designing templates based on a taxonomy of innovative items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

van der Linden, W. J., Breithaupt, K., Chuah, S. C., & Zhang, Y.. (2007). Detecting Differential Speededness in Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44, 117–130. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00030.x

Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. - H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B.. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 95-108.

Walter, O. B., Becker, J., Bjorner, J. B., Fliege, H., Klapp, B. F., & Rose, M.. (2007). Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for “Anxiety” (Anxiety-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 16, 143-155.

Egberink, I. J. L., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2007). The development of a computerized adaptive test for integrity. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Sumbling, M., Sanz, P., Viladrich, M. C., Doval, E., & Riera, L.. (2007). Development of a multiple-component CAT for measuring foreign language proficiency (SIMTEST). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Ferdous, A. A., Plake, B. S., & Chang, S. - R.. (2007). The effect of including pretest items in an operational computerized adaptive test: Do different ability examinees spend different amounts of time on embedded pretest items?. Educational Assessment, 12, 161-173.

Pommerich, M. (2007). The effect of using item parameters calibrated from paper administrations in computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment.

Pommerich, M. (2007). The Effect of Using Item Parameters Calibrated from Paper Administrations in Computer Adaptive Test Administrations. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5.

Penfield, R. D. (2007). Estimating the Standard Error of the Maximum Likelihood Ability Estimator in Adaptive Testing Using the Posterior-Weighted Test Information Function. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 958-975. doi:10.1177/0013164407301544