Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is [Clear All Filters]
Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.
. (2000). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.
. (1987). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
. (1986). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.
. (1992). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables used in computer adaptive testing for DIF analyses. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 3-16.
. (2001). Computerized adaptive personality assessment. Unpublished master’s thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.
. (1989). Adaptive Tests for Measuring Anxiety and Depression. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 123-136). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.
. (2008). Transitioning from Fixed-Length Questionnaires to Computer-Adaptive Versions.pdf (214.47 KB)Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for “Anxiety” (Anxiety-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 16, 143-155.
. (2007). . (2011).
DIF-CAT: Doubly Adaptive CAT Using Subgroup Information to Improve Measurement Precision. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Gu4FR06qM5EZNp_Ns0Kt3HzBqWAv3LPy
. (2017). A Semiparametric Model for Jointly Analyzing Response Times and Accuracy in Computerized Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 381-417. doi:10.3102/1076998612461831
. (2013). Essentially unbiased EAP estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1997). wa97-01.pdf (224.35 KB)The influence of item characteristics and administration position on CAT Scores. In Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association. Hudson Valley, NY, October 26, 2001.
. (2001). An Enhanced Approach to Combine Item Response Theory With Cognitive Diagnosis in Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 358–380. doi:10.1111/jedm.12057
. (2014). Reducing bias in CAT trait estimation: A comparison of approaches. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 263-278.
. (1999). Users guide for SCORIGHT (version 2) : A computer program for scoring tests built of testlets (Research Report 01-06). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2001). Precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis.
. (1995). Improving Measurement Precision of Hierarchical Latent Traits Using Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 452-477. doi:10.3102/1076998614559419
. (2014). Mutual Information Item Selection Method in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Short Test Length. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 1017-1035. doi:10.1177/0013164413498256
. (2013). Relative precision of ability estimation in polytomous CAT: A comparison under the generalized partial credit model and graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). wa02-01.pdf (734.77 KB)Precision of Warm’s weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 317-331.
. (2001). New methods for CBT item pool evaluation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
. (2004). wa04-02.pdf (1004.92 KB)New Challenges (With Solutions) and Innovative Applications of CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wvgxw7in_QCq_F7kzID6zCZuVXWcFDPa
. (2017). Implementation and Measurement Efficiency of Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 295-316. doi:10.1177/0146621604265938
. (2004). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241
. (2020). Essentially unbiased Bayesian estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
. (1998). The precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City (UM No. 9945102).
. (1995). Adaptive Testing With a Hierarchical Item Response Theory Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 51-67. doi:10.1177/0146621618765714
. (2019). Computerized Classification Testing Under the One-Parameter Logistic Response Model With Ability-Based Guessing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 925-941. doi:10.1177/0013164410392372
. (2011). Precision of Warm's weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.
. (1999). wa99-02.pdf (603.32 KB)Hybrid Computerized Adaptive Testing: From Group Sequential Design to Fully Sequential Design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 45–62. doi:10.1111/jedm.12100
. (2016). Achieving accuracy of retest calibration for a national CAT placement examination with a restricted test length. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
. (2004). wa04-01.pdf (836.28 KB)Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2 (4).
. (2001). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720
. (2013). Evaluating comparability in computerized adaptive testing: A theoretical framework with an example. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1997). The precision of ability estimation methods for computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
. (1999). Computerized Classification Testing Under the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 114-128. doi:10.1177/0013164410391575
. (2011). Incorporating post-administration item response revision into a CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1992). Obtaining reliable diagnostic information through constrained CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09douglas.pdf (251.38 KB)User's guide for SCORIGHT (version 1): A computer program for scoring tests built of testlets (Research Report 01-06). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2001). wa01-06.pdf (2.29 MB)Measurement efficiency of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. San Francisco CA.
. (2001). Assembling parallel item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
. (2000). Restrictive Stochastic Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48, 255–273. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00145.x
. (2011). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.
. (1998). Kullback-Leibler information in multidimensional adaptive testing: theory and application. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09wang-chang.pdf (315.78 KB)A general Bayesian model for testlets: theory and applications (Research Report 92-21; GRE Board Professional Report No 99-01P). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1992). Adjusting "scores" from a CAT following successful item challenges. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). wa99-01.pdf (149.06 KB)Deriving Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 99-122. doi:10.1177/0146621612463422
. (2013). The College Board computerized placement tests: An application of computerized adaptive testing. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 271-282.
. (1988). College Board computerized placement tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86-29). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1986). Using microcomputers to administer tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 16-20.
. (1984). . (2000).
Dynamic health assessments: The search for more practical and more precise outcomes measures. Quality of Life Newsletter, 11-13.
. (1999). wa99-04.pdf (74.49 KB)Item response theory in computer adaptive testing: implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol, 50, 71-78.
. (2005). Adaptive testing of cognitive skills. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 5 (part 1), 167-168.
. (1970). A comparison of computer-simulated conventional and branching tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 125-136.
. (1971).