Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al.. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.

Wang, J., Weiss, D. J., & Wang, C.. (2017). DIF-CAT: Doubly Adaptive CAT Using Subgroup Information to Improve Measurement Precision. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Gu4FR06qM5EZNp_Ns0Kt3HzBqWAv3LPy

Robinson, D., Porporino, F. J., & Millson, W. A.. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

Bezruczko, N. (1999). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 3, 35-52.

Bull, J., Dalziel, J., & Vreeland, T.. (2003). Assessing question banks. In Reusing online resources: A sustanable approach to e-learning (pp. 171-230). London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.

Schouwstra, S. (2017). Adaptivity in a Diagnostic Educational Test. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Edmonds, J., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). A mixed integer programming model for multiple stage adaptive testing. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 342-350.

Halkitis, P. N. (1998). The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations. J Outcome Meas, 2, 97-122.

Newton, D. W., Boyle, M., & Catizone, C. A.. (2008). The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 33. presented at the Apr 15.

Drasgow, F. (2002). The work ahead: A psychometric infrastructure for computerized adaptive tests. In M. P. Potenza, Freemer, J. J., & Ward, W. C., Computer-based tests: Building the foundation for future assessment. Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N.. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Laurier, M. (2004). Évaluation et multimédia dans l'apprentissage d'une L2 [Assessment and multimedia in learning an L2]. ReCALL, 16, 475-487.

He, Q., & Tymms, P.. (2005). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2006). Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.

Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A.. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.

Ban, J. - C., Hanson, B. A., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2002). Data sparseness and on-line pretest item calibration-scaling methods in CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 207-218.

Meijer, R. R. (2002). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.

Koppel, N. B. (2000). Lagrangian relaxation for constrained curve-fitting with binary variables: Applications in educational testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1063.

Halkitis, P. N. (1998). The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations. J Outcome Meas, 2, 97-122.

Roex, A., & Degryse, J.. (2004). A computerized adaptive knowledge test as an assessment tool in general practice: a pilot study. Medical Teacher, 26, 178-83. presented at the Mar.

Forker, J. E., & McDonald, M. E.. (1996). Methodologic trends in the healthcare professions: computer adaptive and computer simulation testing. Nurse Education, 21, 13-4. presented at the Jul-Aug.

Kreiter, C. D., Ferguson, K., & Gruppen, L. D.. (1999). Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment. Academic Medicine, 74, 1125-8. presented at the Oct.

Fields, F. A. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing for NCLEX-PN. Journal of Practical Nursing, 42, 8-10. presented at the Jun.

Jones-Dickson, C., Dorsey, D., Campbell-Warnock, J., & Fields, F.. (1993). Moving in a new direction: Computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Nursing Management, 24, 80, 82. presented at the Jan.

Bouchard, J. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: the Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1, 3, 5.

Haynes, B. (1990). National Council Computerized Adaptive Testing Project Review--committee perspective. Issues, 11, 3.

Abad, F. J., Olea, J., Aguado, D., Ponsoda, V., & Barrada, J. R.. (2010). Deterioro de parámetros de los ítems en tests adaptativos informatizados: estudio con eCAT [Item parameter drift in computerized adaptive testing: Study with eCAT]. Psicothema, 22, 340-7.

Cheng, Y., & Chang, H. - H.. (2009). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-83. presented at the May.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J.. (2008). Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 618-625.

Stahl, J., Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (2000). CAT administration of language placement examinations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 292-302.

Lange, R. (2008). Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 81-104.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.

Allen, D. D., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M.. (2008). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.

Gershon, R. C. (2017). FastCAT – Customizing CAT Administration Rules to Increase Response Efficiency. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oPJV-x0p9hRmgJ7t6k-MCC1nAoBSFM1w

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T., & Moser, U.. (2017). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ko2LuiARKqsjL_6aupO4Pj9zgk6p_xhd/view?usp=sharing

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Ludlow, L. H., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2006). Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.

Wang, C., Chen, P., & Jiang, S.. (2020). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241

Aguado, D., Rubio, V. J., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2005). Propiedades psicométricas de un test Adaptativo Informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional [Psychometric properties of an Emotional Adjustment Computerized Adaptive Test]. Psicothema, 17, 484-491.

Rubio, V. J., Aguado, D., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2007). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.

Olea Díaz, J., Ponsoda Gil, V., Revuelta Menéndez, J., Hontangas Beltrán, P., & Abad, F. J.. (2001). Requerimientos, aplicaciones e investigación en tests adaptativos informatizados [Requirements, applications, and investigation in computerized adaptive testing]. Apuntes de Psicologia, 19, 11-28.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.

van der Linden, W. J. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.

Colvin, K., Keller, L. A., & Robin, F.. (2016). Effect of Imprecise Parameter Estimation on Ability Estimation in a Multistage Test in an Automatic Item Generation Context . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 4(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1608-040101

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2006). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.

Revuelta, J. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.

Magis, D., & Raîche, G.. (2011). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482

Hau, K. - T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2001). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.

Taherbhai, H., & Seo, D.. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al.. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.

Levy, R., Behrens, J. T., & Mislevy, R. J.. (2023). An Extended Taxonomy of Variants of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(1). doi:10.7333/2302-100101

Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C.. (2007). Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.

Drasgow, F., & Chuah, S. C.. (2006). Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

Muñiz, J.. (2005). La Validez desde una óptica psicométrica [Validity from a psychometric perspective]. Acta Comportamentalia, 13, 9-20.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al.. (2004). Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Gardner, W., Kelleher, K. J., & Pajer, K. A.. (2002). Multidimensional adaptive testing for mental health problems in primary care. Medical Care, 40, 812-23. presented at the Sep.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: a re-analysis of three clinical studies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 887-902.

Haley, S. M., Siebens, H., Coster, W. J., Tao, W., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Gandek, B., et al.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1033-42. presented at the Aug.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Kosinski, M., & Ni, P.. (2004). Score comparability of short forms and computerized adaptive testing: Simulation study with the activity measure for post-acute care. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 661-6. presented at the Apr.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.

Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. - H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B.. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 95-108.