Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is [Clear All Filters]
Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495
. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.
. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.
. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.
. (2008). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.
. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1995). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.
. (1985). Controlling item exposure rates in a realistic adaptive testing paradigm (Research Report 93-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. In . Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973-977). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1985). Controlling test and computer anxiety: Test performance under CAT and SAT conditions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4, 25-28.
. (1991). Creating a K-12 Adaptive Test: Examining the Stability of Item Parameter Estimates and Measurement Scales. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology
. (2011). Creating adaptive tests of musical ability with limited-size item pools. In . D. Dalton (Ed.), ADCIS 32nd International Conference Proceedings (pp. 105-112). Columbus OH: Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems.
. (1990). Creating computerized adaptive tests of music aptitude: Problems, solutions, and future directions. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 151-176). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1999). Criterion item characteristic curve function for evaluating the differential weight procedure adjusted to on-line item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCME. Chicago IL.
. (2003). Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). th80-03.pdf (2.64 MB)Criterion-related validity of an innovative CAT-based personality measure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09schneider.pdf (162.54 KB)Criterion-related validity of conventional and adaptive tests in a military environment. In Paper presented at the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN.
. (1979). A critical analysis of the argument for and against item review in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (1996). Critical problems in computer-based psychological measurement, , ,. Applied Measurement in Education, 1, 223-231.
. (1988). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.
. (2011). Cross-validating item parameter estimation in adaptive testing. In . A. Boorsma, M. A. J. van Duijn, and T. A. B. Snijders (Eds.) (pp. 205-219), Essays on item response theory. New York: Springer.
. (2000). Current and future challenges. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp 257-269). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Current and future research in multi-stage testing (Research Report No 370). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, Laboratory of Pychometric and Evaluative Research.
. (1999). ze99-01.pdf (130.25 KB)Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 803-815.
. (1985). Current research in computer-based testing for personnel selection and classification in the United States. In Invited address to the Centre for Recruitment and Selection, Belgian Armed Forces".
. (1996). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.
. (2001). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.
. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1999). Cutscore location and classification accuracy in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Tokyo, Japan.
. (2007). ro07-01.pdf (93.59 KB)The danger of relying solely on diagnostic adaptive testing when prior and subsequent instructional methods are different (CERL Report E-5). Urbana IL: Univeristy of Illinois, Computer-Based Education Research Laboratory.
. (1979). Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 142-59.
. (2005). Data sparseness and online pretest calibration/scaling methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle.
. (2001). Data sparseness and on-line pretest item calibration-scaling methods in CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 207-218.
. (2002). Deriving a stopping rule for sequential adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). gr01-01.pdf (110.09 KB)Deriving comparable scores for computer adaptive and conventional tests: An example using the SAT. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Deriving Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 99-122. doi:10.1177/0146621612463422
. (2013). Description of components in tailored testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 153-157.
. (1977). The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers & Education, 49.
. (2007). Design and evaluation of an XML-based platform-independent computerized adaptive testing system. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2), 230-237.
. (2005). Design and implementation of a microcomputer-based adaptive testing system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 13, 399-406.
. (1981). Design of a Computer-Adaptive Test to Measure English Literacy and Numeracy in the Singapore Workforce: Considerations, Benefits, and Implications. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology
. (2011). The design of a computerized adaptive testing system for administering the ASVAB. In Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
. (1984). Design of a Microcomputer-Based Adaptive Testing System. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 360-371). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.
. (1982). va82-01.pdf (696.97 KB)The design of p-optimal item banks for computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF file, 211 KB}.
. (2007). cat07reckase.pdf (210.85 KB)Designing and Implementing a Multistage Adaptive Test: The Uniform CPA Exam. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 167-190). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Designing computerized adaptive tests. In . S.M. Downing and T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2006). Designing Item Pools for Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 231-245). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 149–162). Dendrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
. (2000). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 99-03 ). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1999). Designing item pools to optimize the functioning of a computerized adaptive test. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 127-141.
. (2010). Designing optimal item pools for computerized adaptive tests with Sympson-Hetter exposure control. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07gu-reckase.pdf (1.11 MB)Designing templates based on a taxonomy of innovative items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07parshall.pdf (148.23 KB)Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Riley Carle Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing.pdf (305.3 KB)Detecting Differential Speededness in Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44, 117–130. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00030.x
. (2007). Detecting exposed test items in computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
. (2004). ha04-01.pdf (1.22 MB) . (1999).
Detecting Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Information Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(3), 37-58. doi:10.7333/1410-0203037
. (2014). Detecting items that have been memorized in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Detecting Local Item Dependence in Polytomous Adaptive Data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00165.x
. (2012).