Export 2196 results:
2013
Mao, X., & Xin, T.. (2013). The Application of the Monte Carlo Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 482-496. doi:10.1177/0146621613486015
Yao, L. (2013). Comparing the Performance of Five Multidimensional CAT Selection Procedures With Different Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0146621612455687
Smits, N., & Finkelman, M. D.. (2013). A Comparison of Computerized Classification Testing and Computerized Adaptive Testing in Clinical Psychology. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(2), 19-37. doi:10.7333/1302-0102019
Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CAT Systems Based on Different Measurement Models for Testlets. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 113-135. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434
Leroux, A. J., Lopez, M., Hembry, I., & Dodd, B. G.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802
Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Boughton, K. A.. (2013). Deriving Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 99-122. doi:10.1177/0146621612463422
Crotts, K. M., Zenisky, A. L., Sireci, S. G., & Li, X.. (2013). Estimating Measurement Precision in Reduced-Length Multi-Stage Adaptive Testing . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(4), 67-87. doi:10.7333/1309-0104067
Patton, J. M., Ying Cheng,, Yuan, K. - H., & Diao, Q.. (2013). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727
Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157
Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., He, Y., & Lai, A. M.. (2013). Item Ordering in Stochastically Curtailed Health Questionnaires With an Observable Outcome. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(3), 38-66. doi:10.7333/1304-0103038
Han, K. T. (2013). Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 259-275. doi:10.1177/0146621612473638
Pohl, S. (2013). Longitudinal Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 447–468. doi:10.1111/jedm.12028
Wang, C. (2013). Mutual Information Item Selection Method in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Short Test Length. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 1017-1035. doi:10.1177/0013164413498256
Taherbhai, H., & Seo, D.. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000
Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L.. (2013). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720
Wang, C., Fan, Z., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J. A.. (2013). A Semiparametric Model for Jointly Analyzing Response Times and Accuracy in Computerized Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 381-417. doi:10.3102/1076998612461831
van der Linden, W. J., & Xiong, X.. (2013). Speededness and Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 418-438. doi:10.3102/1076998612466143
Veldkamp, B. P., Matteucci, M., & de Jong, M. G.. (2013). Uncertainties in the Item Parameter Estimates and Robust Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 123-139. doi:10.1177/0146621612469825
Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2013). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 563-582. doi:10.1177/0146621613488642
2012
Frey, A. (2012). Adaptives Testen [Adaptive testing]. In Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer.
Moyer, E. L., Galindo, J. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Balancing Flexible Constraints and Measurement Precision in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 629-648. doi:10.1177/0013164411431838
Jiao, H., Liu, J., Haynie, K., Woo, A., & Gorham, J.. (2012). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903
Lee, H. Y., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Comparison of Exposure Controls, Item Pool Characteristics, and Population Distributions for CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 159-175. doi:10.1177/0013164411411296
PDF icon CAT_StudentSelection1.pdf (120.81 KB)
Makransky, G. (2012). Computerized adaptive testing in industrial and organizational psychology. University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.
PDF icon Guido Makransky Dissertation.pdf (2.72 MB)
Huang, H. - Y., Chen, P. - H., & Wang, W. - C.. (2012). Computerized Adaptive Testing Using a Class of High-Order Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 689-706. doi:10.1177/0146621612459552
Mislevy, J. L., Rupp, A. A., & Harring, J. R.. (2012). Detecting Local Item Dependence in Polytomous Adaptive Data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00165.x
Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Pilkonis, P. A., Frank, E., Moore, T., Kim, J. B., & Kupfer, D. J.. (2012). Development of a computerized adaptive test for depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(11), 1105-1112. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.14
Han, K. T. (2012). An Efficiency Balanced Information Criterion for Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 225–246. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00173.x
Li, F., Cohen, A., & Shen, L.. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Item Position in Computer-Based Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 362–379. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00181.x
Huebner, A. (2012). Item Overexposure in Computerized Classification Tests Using Sequential Item Selection. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(12).
PDF icon v17n12.pdf (296.59 KB)
Ho, T. - H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Item Selection and Ability Estimation Procedures for a Mixed-Format Adaptive Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 305-326. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714686
Hong Jiao,, Macready, G., Liu, J., & Cho, Y.. (2012). A Mixture Rasch Model–Based Computerized Adaptive Test for Latent Class Identification. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 469-493. doi:10.1177/0146621612450068
Edwards, M. C., Flora, D. B., & Thissen, D.. (2012). Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing With Uniform Item Exposure. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 118-141. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.660363
Kim, J., Chung, H., Dodd, B. G., & Park, R.. (2012). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977
Doebler, A. (2012). The Problem of Bias in Person Parameter Estimation in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 255-270. doi:10.1177/0146621612443304
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
2011
Schwall, A., & Sinar, E.. (2011). Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: Unique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Schwall Sinar Item Calibration.pdf (1.15 MB)
Weiss, D. J. (2011). Better Data From Better Measurements Using Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, Vol. 2(No. 1), 1-27.
PDF icon Weiss(2011)_CAT.pdf (417.85 KB)
Chang, H. - H. (2011). Building Affordable CD-CAT Systems for Schools To Address Today's Challenges In Assessment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Affordable CAT Systems Chang.pdf (1.55 MB)
Magis, D., & Raîche, G.. (2011). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
Green, B. F. (2011). A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(2), 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080
Green, B. F. (2011). A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080
Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2011). Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Ideal Point Model. International Journal of Testing, 11, 231-247. doi:10.1080/15305058.2011.561459
Wang, W. - C., & Liu, C. - W.. (2011). Computerized Classification Testing Under the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 114-128. doi:10.1177/0013164410391575

Pages