Chien, T. W., Wu, H. M., Wang, W. - C., Castillo, R. V., & Chou, W.. (2009). Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: tool development and simulation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 39.

Pine, S. M. (1977). Reduction of Test Bias by Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Wise, L. L., McHenry, J. J., Chia, W. J., Szenas, P. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1988). Refinement of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) (Final Report, Contract No MDA203 06-C-0373). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Way, W. D., Swanson, l,, & Stocking, M.. (2001). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Way, W. D., Swanson, L., Steffen, M., & Stocking, M. L.. (2001). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation (Research Report 01-18). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Bond, T. L., & Ni, P. S.. (2004). Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Medical Care, 42, I62-172. presented at the Jan.

Hansen, D. N. (1976). Reflections on adaptive testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 90-94). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D. R., & Kirsch, I.. (1998). The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks (Research Report 98-08). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, D. C., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests (TR 83-27). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1984). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1984). Relationship Between Corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 155-163.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S.,, & Nebelsick-Gullett, L. J.. (1994). The relationship between examinee anxiety and preference for self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education , 7, 81-91.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Swanson, D. B., Featherman, C. M., Case, A. M., Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R.. (1997). Relationship of response latency to test design, examinee ability, and item difficulty in computer-based test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Riley, B. B., Conrad, K. J., Bezruczko, N., & Dennis, M. L.. (2007). Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: The GAIN Substance Problem Scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 48-65.

Wang, S., & Wang, T.. (2002). Relative precision of ability estimation in polytomous CAT: A comparison under the generalized partial credit model and graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Moreno, K. E., & Segall, O. D.. (1997). Reliability and construct validity of CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 169-179). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Jodoin, M. G. (2002). Reliability and decision accuracy of linear parallel form and multi stage tests with realistic and ideal item pools. In Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer-Based Testing and the Internet. Winchester, England.

Thissen, D. (1990). Reliability and measurement precision. In . H. Wainer, N. J. Dorans, R. Flaugher, B. F. Green, R. J. Mislevy, L. Steinberg, and D. Thissen (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 161-186). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Davison, M. L., Semmes, R., Huang, L., & Close, C. N.. (2012). On the Reliability and Validity of a Numerical Reasoning Speed Dimension Derived From Response Times Collected in Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 245-263. doi:10.1177/0013164411408412

McBride, J. R., & Martin, J. T.. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military setting. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 224-236). New York: Academic Press.

McBride, J. R., Martin, J. T., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military recruit population (Research Report 83-1). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Testing Laboratory.

Martin, J. T., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive vs. conventional tests in a military recruit population (Research Rep. No. 83-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D.. (1994). Reliability of alternate computer adaptive tests. In Objective measurement, theory into practice (Vol. II). New Jersey: Ablex.

Sireci, S. G., Wainer, H.,, & Thissen, D.. (1991). On the reliability of testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 237-247.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Jette, A. M., Tao, W., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Ludlow, L. H.. (2009). Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18, 461-71. presented at the May.

Frey, A., Seitz, N. - N., & Kröhne, U.. (2013). Reporting differentiated literacy results in PISA by using multidimensional adaptive testing. . In Research on PISA.. Dodrecht: Springer.

Cleary, T. A., Linn, R. L., & Rock, D. A.. (1968). Reproduction of total test score through the use of sequential programmed tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 183-187.

Olea Díaz, J., Ponsoda Gil, V., Revuelta Menéndez, J., Hontangas Beltrán, P., & Abad, F. J.. (2001). Requerimientos, aplicaciones e investigación en tests adaptativos informatizados [Requirements, applications, and investigation in computerized adaptive testing]. Apuntes de Psicologia, 19, 11-28.

Chang, S. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2005). Rescuing CAT by fixing the problems. In National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wainer, H.,. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.

Dunkel, P. (1999). Research and development of a computer-adaptive test of listening comprehension in the less-commonly taught language Hausa. In . M. Chalhoub-Deville (Ed.). Issues in computer-adaptive testing of reading proficiency. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.

McBride, J. R. (1997). Research antecedents of applied adaptive testing. In B. K. Waters & McBride, J. R., Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to practice (xviii., pp. 47-57). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

McBride, J. R. (1976). Research on adaptive testing 1973-1976: A review of the literature. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.

Zara, A. (1989). A research proposal for field testing CAT for nursing licensure examinations. In . Delegate Assembly Book of Reports 1989. Chicago: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.

Zara, A. (1990). A research proposal for field testing CAT for nursing licensure examinations. In . Delegate Assembly Book of Reports 1989. Chicago: National Council of State Boards of Nursing.

Shi, Y. (2017). Response Time and Response Accuracy in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yYP01bzGrKvJnfLwepcAoQQ2F4TdSvZ2

Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1999). Response time feedback on computer-administered tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Ware, J. E., J., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M.. (2000). Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Medical Care, 38, 73-82.

Wood, R. L. (1973). Response-contingent testing. Review of Educational Research, 43, 529-544.

Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Huebner, A.. (2011). Restrictive Stochastic Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48, 255–273. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00145.x

Sekula-Wacura, R. (2000). A review of CAT review. Popular Measurement, 3, 47-49.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2007). A review of item exposure control strategies for computerized adaptive testing developed from 1983 to 2005. Journal of Technology,Learning, and Assessment,, 5(8).

Killcross, M. C. (1976). A review of research in tailored testing (Report APRE No. 9/76, Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Ministry of Defence, Army Personnel Research Establishment.).

Hambleton, R. K. (1973). A review of testing and decision-making procedures (Technical Bulletin No. 15. Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Andrich, D. (1995). Review of the book Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. Psychometrika, 4?, 615-620.

Vispoel, W. P. (1998). Reviewing and changing answers on computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-345.

Stocking, M. L. (1996). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three models (RR-96-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1997). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.

Lord, F. M. (1971). Robbins-Monro procedures for tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 3-31.

Veldkamp, B. P., & Paap, M. C. S.. (2017). Robust Automated Test Assembly for Testlet-Based Tests: An Illustration with Analytical Reasoning Items. Frontiers in Education, 2, 63. doi:10.3389/feduc.2017.00063

Lau, C. A. (1996). Robustness of a unidimensional computerized testing mastery procedure with multidimensional testing data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.

Weiss, D. J., & Suhadolnik, D.. (1982). Robustness of adaptive testing to multidimensionality. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program. {PDF file, 1.

Zhao, J. C. (1999). The robustness of the unidimensional 3PL IRT model when applied to two-dimensional data in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.

Zhao, J. C., McMorris, R. F., Pruzek, R. M., & Chen, R.. (2002). The robustness of the unidimensional 3PL IRT model when applied to two-dimensional data in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S.. (1997). The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J.. (2008). Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 618-625.

Svetina, D., Liaw, Y. - L., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D.. (2019). Routing Strategies and Optimizing Design for Multistage Testing in International Large-Scale Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 192-213. doi:10.1111/jedm.12206