Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
I
Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
Thomas, T. J., & Green, B. F.. (1989). Item-presentation controls for computerized adaptive testing: Content-balancing versus min-CAT (Research Report 89-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Laboratory.
PDF icon itemusage_QLR.pdf (641.22 KB)
Hornke, L. F. (1995). Item times in computerized testing: A new differential information. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11 (Suppl. 1), 108-109.
Sheng, Y., & Sheng, Z.. (2009). Item selection with biased-coin up-and-down designs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09sheng.pdf (747.16 KB)
Chandra, I. (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q
PDF icon ba09007.pdf (444.91 KB)
Tu, D., Han, Y., Cai, Y., & Gao, X.. (2018). Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomously Scored Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 677-694. doi:10.1177/0146621618762748
van Groen, M., Eggen, T., & Veldkamp, B.. (2011). Item Selection Methods based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classification of Respondents into Multiple Levels. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 van Groen Eggen Veldkamp Item Selection.pdf (593.82 KB)
Veldkamp, B. P. (2003). Item selection in polytomous CAT. In . H. Yanai, A. Okada, K. Shigemasu, Y Kano, and J. J. Meulman (eds.), New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207-214). Tokyo, Japan: Springer-Verlag.
Veldkamp, B. P. (2003). Item selection in polytomous CAT. In A. Okada, Shigenasu, K., Kano, Y., & Meulman, J., New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207–214). Tokyo, Japan: Psychometric Society, Springer.
PDF icon ve03027.pdf (78.48 KB)
Thompson, N. A. (2009). Item selection in computerized classification testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 778-793.
Thompson, N. A. (2009). Item Selection in Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 778-793. doi:10.1177/0013164408324460
Thompson, N. A. (2007). Item selection in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the Conference on High Stakes Testing. University of Nebraska.
PDF icon th07-05.pdf (86.3 KB)
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (1999). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: improving the a-stratified design with the Sympson-Hetter algorithm. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, CA.
Eggen, T. (1999). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 249-261.
Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2018). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 0013164418790634. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2019). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 335-357. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
Lin, C. - J. (2011). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints for Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 20-36. doi:10.1177/0013164410387336
Finkelman, M., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2009). Item selection and hypothesis testing for the adaptive measurement of change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09finkelman.pdf (227.83 KB)
Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
Ho, T. - H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Item Selection and Ability Estimation Procedures for a Mixed-Format Adaptive Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 305-326. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714686
van der Linden, W. J., & Pashley, P. J.. (2010). Item Selection and Ability Estimation in Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 3-30). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
van der Linden, W. J., & Pashley, P. J.. (2000). Item selection and ability estimation in adaptive testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wise, S. L. (1995). Item review and answer changing in computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Third European Conference on Psychological Assessment. Trier, Germany.
Kingsbury, G. G. (1996). Item review and adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
Shi, Y. (2017). Item Response Time on Task Effect in CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 65-102). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G.. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48.
Segall, D. O. (2002). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.
Flaugher, R. (2000). Item pools. In . Wainer, H. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: a primer. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Item pool development and maintenance. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., & Hetter, D. H.. (1997). Item pool development and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 117-130). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Reckase, M. D. (2003). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon re03-01.pdf (134.72 KB)
Reckase, M. D. (2001). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Invited small group session at the 6th Conference of the European Association of Psychological Assessment. Aachen, Germany.
He, W., & Reckase, M. D.. (2014). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629
Reckase, M. D., He, W., Xu, J. - R., & Zhou, X.. (2017). Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs
Han, K. T. (2013). Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 259-275. doi:10.1177/0146621612473638

Pages