Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.
. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.
. (1999). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
. (2020). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
. (2020). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Three practical issues for modern adaptive testing item pools (Research Report 94-5),. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1994). Three response types for broadening the conception of mathematical problem solving in computerized-adaptive tests (Research Report 98-45). Princeton NJ : Educational Testing Service.
. (1998). Three-Category Adaptive Classification Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 373-387). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
. (2019). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.
. (2003). To stratify or not: An investigation of CAT item selection procedures under practical constraints. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
To weight or not to weight – balancing influence of initial and later items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7
. (2008). Toepassing van een computergestuurde adaptieve testprocedure op persoonlijkheidsdata [Application of a computerised adaptive test procedure on personality data]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 56, 119-133.
. (2001). A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174
. (2018). . (1990).
Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.
. (2005). Trace lines for testlets: A use of multiple-categorical-response models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 247-260.
. (1989). Trait parameter recovery using multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in reading and mathematics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 3-25.
. (2005). Trait Parameter Recovery Using Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing in Reading and Mathematics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 3-25. doi:10.1177/0146621604270667
. (2005). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.
. (2008). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Two simulated feasibility studies in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 36, 263-277.
. (1987). Two simulated feasibility studies in computerized adaptive testing (RR-84-15). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1984). Two-Phase Item Selection Procedure for Flexible Content Balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 467-482. doi:10.1177/0146621606292933
. (2007). Two-phase item selection procedure for flexible content balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological. Measurement, 3, 467–482.
. (2007). A two-stage testing procedure (Memorandum 403-77). University of Leyden, The Netherlands, Educational Research Center.
. (1977). A Type I error rate study of a modified SIBTEST DIF procedure with potential application to computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Alberta Canada.
. (1996). Un test adaptatif en langue seconde : la perception des apprenants. In . R.Hivon (Éd.),L’évaluation des apprentissages. Sherbrooke : Éditions du CRP.
. (1993). Una solución a la estimatión inicial en los tests adaptivos informatizados [A solution to initial estimation in CATs.]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 2, 1-6.
. (1997). Uncertainties in the Item Parameter Estimates and Robust Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 123-139. doi:10.1177/0146621612469825
. (2013). Understanding computerized adaptive testing: From Robbins-Munro to Lord and beyond. In . D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 117-133). New York: Sage.
. (2004). Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.
. (1994). Unidimensional and multidimensional models for item response theory. Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. presented at the 06/1982, Minneapolis, MN. USA: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometrics Methods Program.
. (1985). . (1997).
Unproctored Internet test verification: Using adaptive confirmation testing. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 608-630.
. (2011). Up-and-down procedures for approximating optimal designs using person-response functions. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Updated item parameter estimates using sparse CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Use of an on-line computer for psychological testing with the up-and-down method. American Psychologist, 24, 207-211.
. (1969). Use of CAT in dynamic testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The use of computerized adaptive testing to assess psychopathology using the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs. American Evaluation Association. presented at the November, Portland, OR USA: American Evaluation Association .
. (2007). Use of conditional item exposure methodology for an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The use of linear-on-the-fly testing for TOEFL Reading. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). The use of person-fit statistics in computerized adaptive testing. LSAC Research Report Series. presented at the September, 2005, Newton, PA. USA: Law School Administration Council.
. (2005). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 304-314.
. (2010). The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 83-90.
. (1999). Use of Sequential Testing to Prescreen Prospective Entrants to Military Service. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1982). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The use of the graded response model in computerized adaptive testing of the attitudes to science scale. In annual meeting of the American Education Research Association. presented at the April 3-7, 1991, Chicago, IL USA.
. (1991). A Use of the Information Function in Tailored Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 233-247.
. (1977). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The use of the sequential probability ratio test in making grade classifications in conjunction with tailored testing (Research Report 81-4). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology.
. (1981). The use of unidimensional item parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing (No. 87-13). ACT Research Reports (p. 33). presented at the September, 1987, Iowa City, IA: ACT.
. (1987). The use of unidimensional parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 13-24.
. (1991). The Use of Unidimensional Parameter Estimates of Multidimensional Items in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(1), 13-24.
. (1991). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
User's guide for SCORIGHT (version 1): A computer program for scoring tests built of testlets (Research Report 01-06). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2001). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Users guide for SCORIGHT (version 2) : A computer program for scoring tests built of testlets (Research Report 01-06). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2001). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System. St. Paul MN: Author.
. (1984). Users manual for the MicroCAT Testing System, Version 3. St. Paul MN: Author.
. (1988). Users manual for the MicroCAT testing system, Version 3.5. St Paul MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.
. (1996). Using Automated Item Generation in a Large-scale Medical Licensure Exam Program: Lessons Learned. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08.2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=14N8hUc8qexAy5W_94TykEDABGVIJHG1h
. (2017). Using automatic item generation to address item demands for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788
. (2018).