Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2009). Item selection rules in computerized adaptive testing: Accuracy and security. Methodology, 5, 7-17.

Chandra, I. (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q

Ping, C., Shuliang, D., Haijing, L., & Jie, Z.. (2006). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.

Luecht, R. M., & Hirsch, T. M.. (1992). Item selection using an average growth approximation of target information functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 41-51.

Sheng, Y., & Sheng, Z.. (2009). Item selection with biased-coin up-and-down designs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Hornke, L. F. (1995). Item times in computerized testing: A new differential information. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11 (Suppl. 1), 108-109.

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2017). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3

Thomas, T. J., & Green, B. F.. (1989). Item-presentation controls for computerized adaptive testing: Content-balancing versus min-CAT (Research Report 89-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Laboratory.

Rulison, K.,, & Loken, E.. (2009). I've fallen and I can't get up: can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(2), 83-101.

Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023

Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023

Nogami, Y., & Hayashi, N.. (2010). A Japanese Adaptive Test of English as a Foreign Language: Developmental and Operational Aspects. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 191-211). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Thompson, N. A. (2011). JATT Special Issue on Adaptive Testing: Welcome and Overview. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. presented at the 05/2011. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Frey, A., & Moosbrugger, H.. (2004). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.

Nandakumar, R., Banks, J. C., & Roussos, L. A.. (2006). Kernel-smoothed DIF detection procedure for computerized adaptive tests (Computerized testing report 00-08). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Doong, S. H. (2009). A Knowledge-Based Approach for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 530-558. doi:10.3102/1076998609336667

Wang, C., & Chang, H. - H.. (2009). Kullback-Leibler information in multidimensional adaptive testing: theory and application. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Rache, G. (2000). La distribution dchantillonnage en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux rgles darrt : selon lerreur type et selon le nombre ditems administrs [Sampling distribution of the proficiency estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping.. Doctoral thesis, Montreal: University of Montreal.

Raîche, G.. (2002). La simulation d’un test adaptatif basé sur le modèle de Rasch [Simulation of a Rasch-based adaptive test]. Mesure et évaluation en éducation.

Raîche, G.. (1994). La simulation de modèle sur ordinateur en tant que méthode de recherche : le cas concret de l’étude de la distribution d’échantillonnage de l’estimateur du niveau d’habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d’arrêt. Actes du 6e colloque de l‘Association pour la recherche au collégial. Montréal : Association pour la recherche au collégial, ARC.

Muñiz, J.. (2005). La Validez desde una óptica psicométrica [Validity from a psychometric perspective]. Acta Comportamentalia, 13, 9-20.

Koppel, N. B. (2000). Lagrangian relaxation for constrained curve-fitting with binary variables: Applications in educational testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1063.

Janczewski, D., & Lowe, P.. (1992). The Language Training Division's computer adaptive reading proficiency test. Provo, UT: Language Training Division, Office of Training and Education.

Bulut, O., & Cormier, D.. (2017). A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc

Xu, H., Fang, G., Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z.. (2018). Latent Class Analysis of Recurrent Events in Problem-Solving Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 478-498. doi:10.1177/0146621617748325

Traub, R. E., & Lam, Y. R.. (1985). Latent structure and item sampling models for testing. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 19-48.

van Buuren, N., & Eggen, T. J. H. M.. (2017). Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022

Binet, A., & Simon, T.. (1908). Le development de lintelligence chez les enfants. LAnee Psychologique, 14, 1-94.

Raîche, G.. (2002). Le testing adaptatif [Adaptive testing]. In . D. R. Bertrand and J.G. Blais (Eds) : Les théories modernes de la mesure [Modern theories of measurement]. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Auger, R. (1992). Le testing adaptatif avec interprétation critérielle, une expérience de praticabilité du TAM pour l’évaluation sommative des apprentissages au Québec.. (S. P. Seguin)Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 15-1 et 2.

PITON-GONÇALVES, J., ALUISIO, S. M., MENDONCA, L. H., & NOVAES, O. O.. (2004). A learning environment for english for academic purposes based on adaptive tests and task-based systems. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. . Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Gonçalves, J. P., Aluisio, S. M., de Oliveira, L. H. M., & Oliveira Jr., O. N.. (2004). A Learning Environment for English for Academic Purposes Based on Adaptive Tests and Task-Based Systems. In J. C. Lester, Vicari, R. M., & Paraguaçu, F., Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. 3220, pp. 1-11). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_1

De Beer, M. (2000). Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT): Technical Manual. Pretoria: UNISA.

De Beer, M. (2000). Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT): User's Manual. Pretoria: UNISA.

Waters, B. K., & Lee, G. C.. (1982). Legal and political considerations in large-scale adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the 23rd conference of the Military Testing Association.

Laurier, M. (1993). Les tests adaptatifs en langue seconde. Communication lors de la 16e session d’étude de l’ADMÉÉ à Laval. Montréal: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation.

Cook, K. F., Choi, S. W., Crane, P. K., Deyo, R. A., Johnson, K. L., & Amtmann, D.. (2008). Letting the CAT out of the bag: Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33, 1378-83. presented at the May 20.

Raîche, G., & Béland, A.. (1994). L'évaluation nationale individualisée et assistée par ordinateur [Large scale assessment: Tailored and computerized]. In Québec: Proceeding of the 14th Congress of the Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale. Montréal: Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale (AQPC).

Vispoel, W. P., Hendrickson, A., Bleiler, T., Widiatmo, H., Shrairi, S., & Ihrig, D.. (1999). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Vispoel, W. P., Hendrickson, A. B., & Bleiler, T.. (2000). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 21-38.

Li, X., Becker, K., Gorham, J., & Woo, A.. (2009). Limiting item exposure for target difficulty ranges in a high-stakes CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF File, 1.

Lawrence, I., & Feigenbaum, M.. (1997). Linking scores for computer-adaptive and paper-and-pencil administrations of the SAT (Research Report No 97-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Styles, I., & Andrich, D.. (1993). Linking the standard and advanced forms of the Ravens Progressive Matrices in both the paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive-testing formats. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 905-925.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1978). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.

Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2008). Local Dependence in an Operational CAT: Diagnosis and Implications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 201–223. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00061.x

Rose, M., & Bezjak, A.. (2009). Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Quality of Life Research, 18, 125-36. presented at the Feb.

Pohl, S. (2013). Longitudinal Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 447–468. doi:10.1111/jedm.12028

Hontangas, P., Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J.. (2000). Los tests adaptativos informatizados en la frontera del siglo XXI: Una revisión [Computerized adaptive tests at the turn of the 21st century: A review]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 183-216.

Lamos, J. P., & Waters, B. K.. (1977). A Low-Cost Terminal Usable for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Levine, M. L., Segall, D. O., & Williams, B. A.. (1997). Maintaining a CAT item pool with operational data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Luecht, R. M., de Champlain, A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1998). Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 29-41.

Patsula, L. N., & Steffen, M.. (1997). Maintaining item and test security in a CAT environment: A simulation study. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL).

Smith, R. L., Rizavi, S., Paez, R., Damiano, M., & Herbert, E.. (2003). Maintaining scale in computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Guo, F. (1999). Managing CAT item development in the face of uncertainty. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Weiss, D. J., & Guyer, R. D.. (2010). Manual for CATSim: Comprehensive simulation of computerized adaptive testing. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.

Von Tonder, M., & Claasswn, N. C. W.. (1992). Manual for the General Scholastic Aptitude Test (Senior) Computerized adaptive test. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

McBride, J. R., & Tardrew, S. P.. (2002). Mapping the Development of Pre-reading Skills with STAR Early Literacy. In Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. Chicago.

Glas, C. A. W., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2010). Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 603-26.

Verschoor, A. J., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M.. (2010). MATHCAT: A Flexible Testing System in Mathematics Education for Adults. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 137-150). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Jones, D. H. (1997). Mathematical programming approaches to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.