Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 83-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). we83-02.pdf (1.04 MB)Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 81-104.
. (2008). A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 49-64. doi:10.1177/0146621619835500
. (2020). A brief overview of adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). we77-01.pdf (3.15 MB)A broad range tailored test of verbal ability. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 75-78). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). lo75-01.pdf (249.89 KB)A broad range test of verbal ability (RB-75-5). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1975). lo75-01.pdf (249.89 KB) . (1977).
. (1977). v01n1p095.pdf (402.88 KB)
Building a statistical foundation for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
. (1996). Building Affordable CD-CAT Systems for Schools To Address Today's Challenges In Assessment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Affordable CAT Systems Chang.pdf (1.55 MB)Building algebra testlets: A comparison of hierarchical and linear structures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, xxx-xxx.
. (1991). Bundle models for computerized adaptive testing in e-learning assessment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07scalise.pdf (425.37 KB)A burdened CAT: Incorporating response burden with maximum Fisher's information for item selection. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09swartz.pdf (373.74 KB)Calibrating CAT item pools and online pretest items using MCMC methods. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). se03-02.pdf (154.84 KB)Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). po03-01.pdf (283.64 KB)Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using nonparametric and adjusted marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). kr03-01.pdf (127.09 KB)Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.
. (2003). bj03913.pdf (285.58 KB)Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). be77-05.pdf (1.81 MB)Calibration of CAT items administered online for classification: Assumption of local independence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
. (1997). Can an item response theory-based pain item bank enhance measurement precision?. Clinical Therapeutics, 25, D34-D36.
. (2003). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.
. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2001). Can We Assess Pre-K Kids With Computer-Based Tests: STAR Early Literacy Data. In Presentation to the 33rd Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.. San Antonio TX.
. (2003). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.
. (2000). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-07). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Case studies in computerized adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report 93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). CAST 5 for Windows users' guide. Contract No. "MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
. (1997). CASTISEL [Computer software]. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
. (1998). . (2000).
CAT administration of language placement exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). CAT administrator [Computer program]. Chicago: Micro Connections.
. (1989). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1999). CAT item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
. (1998). CAT Item exposure control: New evaluation tools, alternate methods and integration into a total CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1998). CAT Security: A practitioner’s perspective. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07guo.pdf (103.83 KB)CAT software system [computer program. Chicago IL: Computer Adaptive Technologies.
. (1994). Is CAT Suitable for Automated Speaking Test?. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). A CAT with personality and attitude. Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.
. (2006). CAT-ASVAB cost and benefit analyses. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 227-236). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). CAT-ASVAB operational test and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and . R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 199-205). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). CAT-ASVAB precision. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, 1, 22-26.
. (1992). CAT-ASVAB prototype Internet delivery system: Final report (FR-03-06). Arlington VA: Human Resources Rsearch Organization.
. (2003). st03-01.pdf (392.98 KB)CAT-GATB simulation studies. San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1994). CAT-MD: Computerized adaptive testing on mobile devices. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 3, 13-20.
. (2008). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
. (2011). CATS, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 185-202.
. (1987). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
. (1986). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (2001). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2000). CB BULATS: Examining the reliability of a computer based test using test-retest method. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, Issue 5, July 2001, pp.
. (2001). ge01-01.pdf (455.94 KB)CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (2000). Change in distribution of latent ability with item position in CAT sequence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education in New Orleans. LA.
. (2000). kr00-01.pdf (102.42 KB)The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.
. (2000). Choices in CAT models in the context of educational testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07eggen.pdf (122.29 KB)Choices in CAT models in the context of educattional testing. In GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the June 7, 2007, St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admission Council.
. (2007). Classification accuracy and test security for a computerized adaptive mastery test calibrated with different IRT models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000).