. (2000). Methods of controlling the exposure of items in CAT. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 163-182). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.
. (1988). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Research Report RR-88-28-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1995). A new method of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Modern computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Joint Statistics and Psychometric Seminar. Princeton NJ.
. (1996). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three models (RR-96-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1997). An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 365-389.
. (2002). An exploration of potentially problematic adaptive tests. Research Report 02-05).
. (1993). A Method for Severely Constrained Item Selection in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(3), 277-292.
v17n3p277.pdf (1.06 MB). (1997). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.
. (1984). Two simulated feasibility studies in computerized adaptive testing (RR-84-15). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2000). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1997). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 97-10). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). The application of an automated item selection method to real data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 167-176.
. (1985). Equivalence of scores from computerized adaptive and paper-and-pencil ASVAB tests (No. CNR 113) (p. 100). Alexandria, VA. USA: Center for Naval Analysis.
. (1987). Equivalent-groups versus single-group equating designs for the Accelerated CAT-ASVAB Project (Research Memorandum 87-6). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.
. (1994). The historical developments of fit and its assessment in the computerized adaptive testing environment. In Midwestern Education Research Association annual meeting. presented at the 10/1994, Chicago, IL USA.
. (1994). Item calibration considerations: A comparison of item calibrations on written and computerized adaptive examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.
. (1989). Testing software review: MicroCAT Version 3. . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8 (3), 33-38.
. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characterstics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.
. (2001). Detection of misfitting item-score patterns in computerized adaptive testing. Enschede, The Netherlands: Febodruk B.
. (1999). Computerized adaptive testing in the Bundeswehr. Unpublished manuscript.
st99-01.pdf (426.36 KB). (2017). Multi-stage Testing for a Multi-disciplined End-of primary-school Test . In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1C5ys178p_Wl9eemQuIsI56IxDTck2z8P
. (1998). Computerized adaptive testing: What it is and how it works. Educational Technology, 38, 45-52.
. (2004). Test difficulty and stereotype threat on the GRE General Test. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 563-597.
. (2000). The development of a computerized version of Vandenberg's mental rotation test and the effect of visuo-spatial working memory loading. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 3938.
. (1993). Linking the standard and advanced forms of the Ravens Progressive Matrices in both the paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive-testing formats. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 905-925.
. (2016). A Comparison of Constrained Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 346-360. doi:10.1177/0146621616639305
. (2007). Development of a multiple-component CAT for measuring foreign language proficiency (SIMTEST). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat07sumbling.pdf (256.99 KB). (2001). Development of an adaptive multimedia program to collect patient health data. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 21, 320-324.
. (2019). Routing Strategies and Optimizing Design for Multistage Testing in International Large-Scale Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 192-213. doi:10.1111/jedm.12206
. (2003). Small sample estimation in dichotomous item response models: Effect of priors based on judgmental information on the accuracy of item parameter estimates. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 27-51.
. (1997). Relationship of response latency to test design, examinee ability, and item difficulty in computer-based test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2009). A burdened CAT: Incorporating response burden with maximum Fisher's information for item selection. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09swartz.pdf (373.74 KB). (1998). An examination of item-level response times from an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Urbana IL.
. (1997). Detecting misbehaving items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL.
. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing in computer science: assessing student programming abilities. In Proceedings of the twenty-fourth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Indianapolis IN.
. (1995). Estimation of item difficulty from restricted CAT calibration samples. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education in San Francisco.
. (1982). Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.
. (1985). Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. In . Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973-977). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1985). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.
. (1979). Criterion-related validity of conventional and adaptive tests in a military environment. In Paper presented at the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN.
. (1982). Item Calibrations for Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Experimental Item Pools Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
sy82-01.pdf (104.17 KB). (1984). Predictive validity of computerized adaptive testing in a military training environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1977). Estimation of latent trait status in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
we77-01.pdf (3.15 MB). (1985). Validity of adaptive testing: A summary of research results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
. (1977). A model for testing with multidimensional items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1978). A model for testing with multidimensional items. Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. presented at the 06/1978, Minneapolis, MN. USA: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometrics Methods Program.
. (1980). Estimating the reliability of adaptive tests from a single test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston.
sy81-01.pdf (7.42 MB). (1975). Evaluating the results of computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 26-31. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
sy75-01.pdf (448.16 KB). (2004). Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 301-18.
. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000
. (2023). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032
. (2009). Guess what? Score differences with rapid replies versus omissions on a computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09talento-miller.pdf (214.05 KB). (1992). A comparison of methods for adaptive estimation of a multidimensional trait. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
. (1973). A multivariate experimental study of three computerized adaptive testing models for the measurement of attitude toward teaching effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
. (1998). A comparison of two methods of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
. (1996). A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.
. (1979). The danger of relying solely on diagnostic adaptive testing when prior and subsequent instructional methods are different (CERL Report E-5). Urbana IL: Univeristy of Illinois, Computer-Based Education Research Laboratory.