Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). Simulation studies of two-stage ability testing (Research Report 74-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Zwick, R., Thayer, D., & Wingersky, M.. (1993). A simulation study of methods for assessing differential item functioning in computer-adaptive tests (Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-11). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Zwick, R., Thayer, D. T., & Wingersky, M.. (1994). A Simulation Study of Methods for Assessing Differential Item Functioning in Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 121-140.

Holland, P. W., & Zwick, R.. (1991). A simulation study of some simple approaches to the study of DIF for CATs. Internal memorandum, Educational Testing Service.

Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). A simulation study of stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Way, W. D. (1994). A simulation study of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure for detecting DIF with the NCLEX using CAT (Technical Report xx-xx). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Ross, L. P., Nandakumar, R,, & Clauser, B. E.. (1997). A simulation study of the use of the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression procedures for assessing DIF in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Xu, X., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2003). A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Yang, J., Tao, J., Chang, H. - H., & Shi, N. - Z.. (2017). A Simulation Study to Compare Classification Method in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jCL3fPZLgzIdwvEk20D-FliZ15OTUtpr

Han, K. T. (2010). SimulCAT: Windows application that simulates computerized adaptive test administration. Retrieved from http://www.hantest.net/simulcat

Lord, F. M. (1983). Small N justifies Rasch model. In R. D. Bock, New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 51-61). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Swaminathan, H., Hambleton, R. K., Sireci, S. G., Xing, D., & Rizavi, S. M.. (2003). Small sample estimation in dichotomous item response models: Effect of priors based on judgmental information on the accuracy of item parameter estimates. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 27-51.

Judd, W. (2011). Small-Sample Shadow Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Patience, W. M. (1990). Software review: MicroCAT Testing System Version 3. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 82-88.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2000). Solving complex constraints in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, USA.

Luecht, R. M. (1995). Some alternative CAT item selection heuristics (Internal report). Philadelphia PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.

van der Linden, W. J. (2003). Some alternatives to Sympson-Hetter item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 249-265.

Theunissen, T. J. J. M. (1986). Some applications of optimization algorithms in test design and adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 381-389.

Theunissen, T. J. J. M. (1986). Some Applications of Optimization Algorithms in Test Design and Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10(4), 381-389.

Samejima, F. (1998). Some considerations for eliminating biases in ability estimation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Samejima, F. (2000). Some considerations for improving accuracy of estimation of item characteristic curves in online calibration of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Stocking, M. L. (1988). Some considerations in maintaining adaptive test item pools (Research Report 88-33-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1988). Some considerations in maintaining adaptive test item pools (Tech Rep. No. ERIC ED391814). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.

Reckase, M. D. (1980). Some decision procedures for use with tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 79-100). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Moonan, W. J. (1950). Some empirical aspects of the sequential analysis technique as applied to an achievement examination. Journal of Experimental Education, 18, 195-207.

Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C.. (1991). Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2002). Some features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Communication proposée au 11e Biannual International objective measurement workshop. New-Orleans : International Objective Measurement Workshops.

Blais, J. - G., & Raiche, G.. (2002). Some features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.

Lord, F. M. (1980). Some how and which for practical tailored testing. In . L. J. T. van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak and D.N.M. de Gruijter (Eds): Psychometrics for educational debates (pp. 189-206). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Computer-Assisted Instruction, Testing, and Guidance (pp. 139-183). New York: Harper and Row.

Singh, J. (1993). Some initial experiments with adaptive survey designs for structured questionnaires. In Paper presented at the New Methods and Applications in Consumer Research Conference. Cambridge MA.

Thissen, D. (1998). Some item response theory to provide scale scores based on linear combinations of testlet scores, for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Lord, F. M. (1976). Some likelihood functions found in tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 79-81). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

van der Linden, W. J. (2008). Some new developments in adaptive testing technology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 3-11.

Berger, M. P. F.,, & Veerkamp, W. J. J.. (1997). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.

Veerkamp, W. J. J.,, & Berger, M. P. F.. (1997). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.

Veerkamp, W. J., & Berger, M. P. F.. (1994). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing (Research Rep 94-6). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.

Segall, D. O., & Davey, T. C.. (1995). Some new methods for content balancing adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Wainer, H.,. (1992). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format (Research Report 92-21 or 13?). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wainer, H.,. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.

Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (1998). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229-249.

Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (1996). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing (Internal Report). Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners.

van der Linden, W. J., & Zwarts, M. A.. (1989). Some procedures for computerized ability testing. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 175-187.

McBride, J. R. (1977). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 121-140.

McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy (Research Report 76-1). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

McBride, J. R. (1977). Some Properties of a Bayesian Adaptive Ability Testing Strategy. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 121-140.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Some questions that must be addressed to develop and maintain an item pool for use in an adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Böhnke, J. R.. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1055–1063. presented at the Apr. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1821-8

Wang, T. (1999). Some relationship among issues in CAT item pool management.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Some reliability estimates for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 239-47.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1998). Some reliability estimators for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Lord, F. M. (1970). Some test theory for tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.139-183). New York: Harper and Row.

Lewis, C. (2007). Some thoughts on controlling item exposure in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Miceli, R., & Molinengo, G.. (2005). Somministrazione di test computerizzati di tipo adattivo: Un' applicazione del modello di misurazione di Rasch [Administration of computerized and adaptive tests: An application of the Rasch Model]. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 12, 131-149.

Davey, T., & Fan, M.. (2000). Specific information item selection for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.

van der Linden, W. J., & Xiong, X.. (2013). Speededness and Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 418-438. doi:10.3102/1076998612466143

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1990). The stability of Rasch pencil and paper item calibrations on computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago IL.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1999). Standard errors of proficiency estimates in stratum scored CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Gushta, M. M. (2003). Standard-setting issues in computerized-adaptive testing. In Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education. Halifax, Nova Scotia, May 30th, 2003.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2001). STAR Early Literacy Computer-Adaptive Diagnostic Assessment: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2002). STAR Math 2 Computer-Adaptive Math Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.