Raîche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2002). Some features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Communication proposée au 11e Biannual International objective measurement workshop. New-Orleans : International Objective Measurement Workshops.

Raîche, G.. (1994). La simulation de modèle sur ordinateur en tant que méthode de recherche : le cas concret de l’étude de la distribution d’échantillonnage de l’estimateur du niveau d’habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d’arrêt. Actes du 6e colloque de l‘Association pour la recherche au collégial. Montréal : Association pour la recherche au collégial, ARC.

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2002). Étude de la distribution d'échantillonnage de l'estimateur du niveau d'habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d'arrêt dans le contexte de l'application du modèle de Rasch [Study of the sampling distribution of the proficiecy estima. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 24(2-3), 23-40.

Raiche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2002). Practical considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a prior, adaptive corrections for bias, adaptive integration interval. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.

Raîche, G.. (2002). Le testing adaptatif [Adaptive testing]. In . D. R. Bertrand and J.G. Blais (Eds) : Les théories modernes de la mesure [Modern theories of measurement]. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Raîche, G.. (2002). La simulation d’un test adaptatif basé sur le modèle de Rasch [Simulation of a Rasch-based adaptive test]. Mesure et évaluation en éducation.

Raîche, G., & Béland, A.. (1994). L'évaluation nationale individualisée et assistée par ordinateur [Large scale assessment: Tailored and computerized]. In Québec: Proceeding of the 14th Congress of the Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale. Montréal: Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale (AQPC).

Raîche, G.. (1994). Utilisation de la simulation en tant que méthodologie de recherche [Simulation methodology in research]. In . Association pour la recherche au collégial (Ed.) : L'en-quête de la créativité [In quest of creativity]. Proceeding of the 6th Congress of the ARC. Montréal: Association pour la recherche au collégial (ARC).

Raîche, G., Blais, J. G., & Magis, D.. (2007). Adaptive estimators of trait level in adaptive testing: Some proposals. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Raîche, G.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure des étudiants : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif. In Commnication présentée à l’intérieur de la 23e session d’études de l’Association pour le dévelopement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation. ADMÉÉ.

Raiche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2009). Considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10, 138-56.

Raîche, G, B. J. G., & Boiteau, N.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure pour chaque étudiant : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif par ordinateur en éducation [Tailored testing for each student : Principles and stakes of computerized adaptive testing in education]. In Presented at the 23th Study Session of the ADMÉÉ. Québec: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation (ADMÉÉ).

Raîche, G.. (2001). Principes et enjeux du testing adaptatif : de la loi des petits nombres à la loi des grands nombres. In Communication présentée à l’intérieur du 69e congrès de l’Association canadienne française pour l’avancement de la science. Acfas.

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2009). a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(2).

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2006). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.

Rammsayer, T., & Brandler, S.. (2003). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.

Ray, R. D. (2004). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In R. W. Malott, Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Rebollo, P., Castejon, I., Cuervo, J., Villa, G., Garcia-Cueto, E., Diaz-Cuervo, H., et al.. (2010). Validation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Reckase, M. D. (2000). Computerized testing – the adolescent years: Juvenile delinquent or positive role model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Reckase, M. D., He, W., Xu, J. - R., & Zhou, X.. (2017). Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs

Reckase, M. D. (1975). The effect of item choice on ability estimation when using a simple logistic tailored testing model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C.

Reckase, M. D., Thompson, T. D., & Nering, M.. (1997). Identifying similar item content clusters on multiple test forms. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg, TN, June.

Reckase, M. D. (1982). Discussion: Adaptive and sequential testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Reckase, M. D. (1989). The interpretation and application of multidimensional item response theory models; and computerized testing in the instructional environment: Final Report (Research Report ONR 89-2). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program.

Reckase, M. D. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: a good idea waiting for the right technology. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, April 1988.

Reckase, M. D. (1974). An application of the Rasch simple logistic model to tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.. St. Loius MO.

Reckase, M. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Reckase, M., Ju, U., & Kim, S.. (2019). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001

Reckase, M. D. (1980). Some decision procedures for use with tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 79-100). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Reckase, M. D. (1986). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.

Reckase, M. D. (2010). Designing item pools to optimize the functioning of a computerized adaptive test. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 127-141.

Reckase, M. D. (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001

Reckase, M. D. (1978). A generalization of sequential analysis to decision making with tailored testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Military Testing Association. Oklahoma City OK.

Reckase, M. D. (1977). Procedures for computerized testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 70, 351-356.

Reckase, M. D. (1973). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the National Conference on the Us of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.

Reckase, M. D. (2001). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Invited small group session at the 6th Conference of the European Association of Psychological Assessment. Aachen, Germany.

Reckase, M. D. (1981). The use of the sequential probability ratio test in making grade classifications in conjunction with tailored testing (Research Report 81-4). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology.

Reckase, M. D. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.

Reckase, M. D. (1976). Procedures for computerized testing. In Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the National Conference on the Use of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.

Reckase, M. D. (1974). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 208-212.

Reckase, M. D. (2017). How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu

Reckase, M. D. (2003). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Reckase, M. D. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.

Reckase, M. D. (1983). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Reckase, M. D. (1976). The effect of item pool characteristics on the operation of a tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Murray Hill NJ.

Reckase, M. D. (2007). The design of p-optimal item banks for computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF file, 211 KB}.

Ree, M. J. (1981). The Effects of Item Calibration Sample Size and Item Pool Size on Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5(1), 11-19.

Ree, M. J. (1977). Implementation of a Model Adaptive Testing System at an Armed Forces Entrance and Examination Station. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.

Reese, L. M., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1996). An evaluation of a two-stage testlet design for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.

Reese, C. M. (1993). Establishing time limits for the GRE computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.

Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al.. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.

Rehab-Group-Inc.,. (1980). Final Report: Computerized adaptive testing, assessment of requirements. Falls Church VA: Author.

Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G.. (1988). Fitting the two-parameter model to personality data: The parameterization of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. In Unpublished manuscript.

Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G.. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48.

Reise, S. P., & Henson, J. M.. (2000). Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 7, 347-64.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2002). STAR Math 2 Computer-Adaptive Math Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2001). STAR Early Literacy Computer-Adaptive Diagnostic Assessment: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2000). STAR Reading 2 Computer-Adaptive Reading Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.