Export 88 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is D  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
D
Dunkel, P. (1999). Research and development of a computer-adaptive test of listening comprehension in the less-commonly taught language Hausa. In . M. Chalhoub-Deville (Ed.). Issues in computer-adaptive testing of reading proficiency. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
Du, Y., Lewis, C., & Pashley, P. J.. (1993). Computerized mastery testing using fuzzy set decision theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 181-193.
Drasgow, F., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B.. (1999). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Drasgow, F., & Chuah, S. C.. (2006). Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.
Drasgow, F. (2002). The work ahead: A psychometric infrastructure for computerized adaptive tests. In M. P. Potenza, Freemer, J. J., & Ward, W. C., Computer-based tests: Building the foundation for future assessment. Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Dowling, C. E., & Kaluscha, R.. (1995). Prerequisite relationships for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. In . Greer, J. (Ed.) Proceedings of AIED'95, 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Washington, DC, AACE 43-50.
Dowling, C. E., Hockemeyer, C., & Ludwig, A. H.. (1996). Adaptive assessment and training using the neighbourhood of knowledge states. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montral, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 578-587.
Doucette, D. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art in assessment at three community colleges. Laguna Hills CA: League for Innovation in the Community College.
Doong, S. H. (2009). A Knowledge-Based Approach for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 530-558. doi:10.3102/1076998609336667
Donadello, I., Spoto, A., Sambo, F., Badaloni, S., Granziol, U., & Vidotto, G.. (2017). ATS-PD: An Adaptive Testing System for Psychological Disorders. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 792-815. doi:10.1177/0013164416652188
Dolan, S. (1993). A comparison of computer adaptive test administration methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Doebler, A. (2012). The Problem of Bias in Person Parameter Estimation in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 255-270. doi:10.1177/0146621612443304
Dodd, B. G., De Ayala, R. J., & Koch. W.R.,. (1995). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(1), 5-22.
PDF icon v19n1p005.pdf (1.4 MB)
Dodd, B. G. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing with the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the Fourth International Objective Measurement Workshop. Chicago.
Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1998). Alternatives for scoring computerized adaptive tests. In J. J. Fremer & Ward, W. C., Computer-based testing. Mahwah, N.J., USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
PDF icon v14n4p355.pdf (885.93 KB)
Dodd, B. G., de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R.. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 5–22.
Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1988). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement: A comparison of the graded response and rating scale models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
PDF icon v13n2p129.pdf (1.73 MB)
Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1998). Alternatives for scoring computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at an Educational Testing Service-sponsored colloquium entitled Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments. Philadelphia PA.
Do, B. - R., Chuah, S. C., & Drasgow, F.. (2004). Item parameter recovery with adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon do04-01.pdf (378.66 KB)
Divgi, D. R. (1989). Estimating Reliabilities of Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 145-149.
PDF icon v13n2p145.pdf (655.37 KB)
Diones, R., & Everson, H.. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: Assessment of the future. Curriculum/Technology Quarterly, 4 (2), 1-3.
Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157
Diao, Q., & Reckase, M.. (2009). Comparison of ability estimation and item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09diao.pdf (341.8 KB)
DeWitt, L. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 104-107.
Desmarais, M. C., Pu, X,, & Blais, J. - G.. (2007). Partial order knowledge structures for CAT applications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07desmarais.pdf (474.93 KB)
Desmarais, M. C., & Pu, X.. (2005). A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.
Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x
Deng, H., & Chang, H. - H.. (2001). a-stratified computerized adaptive testing with unequal item exposure across strata. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Deng, H., & Ansley, T.. (2003). To stratify or not: An investigation of CAT item selection procedures under practical constraints. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon de03-01.pdf (185.22 KB)
De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon de74-1.pdf (2.67 MB)
De la Torre, R., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1991). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive testing system. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
De Champlain, A. F. (2017). Using Automated Item Generation in a Large-scale Medical Licensure Exam Program: Lessons Learned. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08.2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=14N8hUc8qexAy5W_94TykEDABGVIJHG1h
De Beer, M. (2007). Use of CAT in dynamic testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat2007debeer.pdf (133.49 KB)
PDF icon debe03-02.pdf (562.16 KB)
De Beer, M. (2000). The construction and evaluation of a dynamic computerised adaptive test for the measurement of learning potential. Unpublished D. Litt et Phil dissertation. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
De Beer, M. (2003). A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.
PDF icon debe03-01.pdf (390.1 KB)
De Beer, M. (2002). Utility of Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT) scores in predicting academic performance of bridging students: A comparison with other predictors. In Paper presented at the 5th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology Congress. Pretoria, South Africa.
De Ayals, R. J. (1992). The Nominal Response Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 327-343.
PDF icon v16n4p327.pdf (1.45 MB)
de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.
de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.

Pages