Effects of test administration mode on item parameter estimates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). yi03-02.pdf (232.48 KB)Implementing the a-stratified method with b blocking in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). yi03-01.pdf (495.88 KB)Relative precision of ability estimation in polytomous CAT: A comparison under the generalized partial credit model and graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). wa02-01.pdf (734.77 KB)A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.
. (2001). Precision of Warm’s weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 317-331.
. (2001). Assembling parallel item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
. (2000). Effects of nonequivalence of item pools on ability estimates in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). ba00-01.pdf (656.37 KB)A new item selection procedure for mixed item type in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
. (2000). la00-01.pdf (451.53 KB)Adjusting "scores" from a CAT following successful item challenges. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). wa99-01.pdf (149.06 KB)Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (1999). Comparison of the a-stratified method, the Sympson-Hetter method, and the matched difficulty method in CAT administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.
. (1999). Computerized classification testing under practical constraints with a polytomous model. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/1999, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
. (1999). la99-01.pdf (578.11 KB)Computerized classification testing under practical constraints with a polytomous model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.
. (1999). Precision of Warm's weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.
. (1999). wa99-02.pdf (603.32 KB)Reducing bias in CAT trait estimation: A comparison of approaches. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 263-278.
. (1999). Comparing and combining dichotomous and polytomous items with SPRT procedure in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
. (1998). la98-01.pdf (374.46 KB)Essentially unbiased Bayesian estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
. (1998). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.
. (1998). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1997). Essentially unbiased EAP estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1997). wa97-01.pdf (224.35 KB)Evaluating comparability in computerized adaptive testing: A theoretical framework with an example. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1997). Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis.
. (1995). The precision of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City (UM No. 9945102).
. (1995). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
. (1994). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1992).