Patsula, L. N. (1999). A comparison of computerized-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Patsula, L. N. (2000). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.

Patience, W. M. (1977). Description of components in tailored testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 153-157.

Patience, W. M.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Operational characteristics of a one-parameter tailored testing procedure. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, August 1980, 10, 66 (Ms No. 2104).

Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Effects of program parameters and item pool characteristics on the bias of a three-parameter tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Boston MA, U.

Patience, W. M. (1990). Software review: MicroCAT Testing System Version 3. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 82-88.

Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Operational characteristics of a Rasch model tailored testing procedure when program parameters and item pool attributes are varied. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Paterson, J. J. (1962). An evaluation of the sequential method of testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Pastor, D. A., Chiang, C., Dodd, B. G., & and Yockey, R.. (1999). Performance of the Sympson-Hetter exposure control algorithm with a polytomous item bank. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H.. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E. S.. (2008). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E.. (2007). Test design optimization in CAT early stage with the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 213-232.

Pashley, P. (1997). An overview of the LSAC CAT research agenda. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Parshall, C. G., Harmes, J. C., Davey, T., & Pashley, P. J.. (2010). Innovative Items for Computerized Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 215-230). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Parshall, C., Hogarty, K., & Kromrey, J.. (1999). Item exposure in adaptive tests: An empirical investigation of control strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.

Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Pashley, P.. (2002). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In . In W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer (in press).

Parshall, C., Davey, T., Spray, J., & Kalohn, J.. (1999). Computerized testing – Issues and applications (Mini-course manual). In Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal.

Parshall, C., Harmes, J. C., & Kromrey, J. D.. (2000). Item exposure control in computer-adaptive testing: The use of freezing to augment stratification. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 40, 28-52.

Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Test development exposure control for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., & Hogarty, K. Y.. (2000). Sufficient simplicity or comprehensive complexity? A comparison of probabilitic and stratification methods of exposure control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Parshall, C. G. (1998). Item development and pretesting in a computer-based testing environment. In Paper presented at the Educational Testing Service Sponsored Colloquium on Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments. Philadelphia.

Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., Harmes, J. C., & Sentovich, C.. (2001). Nearest neighbors, simple strata, and probabilistic parameters: An empirical comparison of methods for item exposure control in CATs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Parshall, C. G., & Harmes, J. C.. (2007). Designing templates based on a taxonomy of innovative items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Parker, S. B., & McBride, J. R.. (1990). A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.

Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2014). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545

Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2017). The Development of MST Test Information for the Prediction of Test Performances. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 570-586. doi:10.1177/0013164416662960

Park, J. (2007). A new delivery system for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Papanastasiou, E. C. (2001). A rearrangement procedure for administering adaptive tests when review options are permitted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Papanastasiou, E. C., & Reckase, M. D.. (2007). A “Rearrangement Procedure” For Scoring Adaptive Tests with Review Options. International Journal of Testing, 7, 387-407. doi:10.1080/15305050701632262

Papanastasiou, E. C. (2002). A “rearrangement procedure” for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Panter, A. T., & Reeve, B. B.. (2002). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.

Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.

Padaki, M., & Natarajan, V.. (2009). An approach to implementing adaptive testing using item response theory both offline and online. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (2019). Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 68-83. doi:10.1177/0146621618765719

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2017). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Glas, C. A. W., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2018). Measuring patient-reported outcomes adaptively: Multidimensionality matters!. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621617733954

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (In Press). Measurement efficiency for fixed-precision multidimensional computerized adaptive tests: Comparing health measurement and educational testing using example banks. Applied Psychological Measurement.

Owen, R. J. (1969). A Bayesian approach to tailored testing (Research Report 69-92). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Owen, R. J. (1975). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351-356.

Owen, R. J. (1979). Bayesian sequential design and analysis of dichotomous experiments with special reference to mental testing. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Overton, R. C., Harms, H. J., Taylor, L. R., & Zickar, M. J.. (1997). Adapting to adaptive testing. Personnel Psychology, 50, 171-185.

Oswald, F. L., Shaw, A., & Farmer, W. L.. (2015). Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 144-154. doi:10.1177/0146621614559517

Orban, J. A. (1982). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4233.

Orban, J. A. (1981). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Dissertational Abstracts International, 1982, 42,(10-B), 4233.

Oltman, P. K. (1994). Computerized Testing (Research Report 94-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Olson, J. B. (1990). Applying computerized adaptive testing in schools. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 311-38.

Olson, J. B., Maynes, D. D., Slawson, D., & Ho, K.. (1989). Comparisons of paper-administered, computer-administered and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 311-326.

Olson, A. (2002). Technology solutions for testing. School Administrator, 4, 20-23.

Olsen, J. B., Maynes, D. D., Slawson, D., & Ho, K.. (1986). Comparison and equating of paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive tests of achievement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Olsen, J. B., & Bunderson, C. V.. (2007). Validity and decision issues in selecting a CAT measurement model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Florida State University.

Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 (7-A), 4257.

Olivier, P. (1973). An overview of tailored testing (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Program of Educational Evaluation and Research Design.

Olea., J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Belchi, J.. (1996). Propiedades psicometricas du un test adaptivo informatizado do vocabulario ingles [Psychometric properties of a computerized adaptive tests for the measurement of English vocabulary]. Estudios de Psicologica, 55, 61-73.

Olea Díaz, J., Ponsoda Gil, V., Revuelta Menéndez, J., Hontangas Beltrán, P., & Abad, F. J.. (2001). Requerimientos, aplicaciones e investigación en tests adaptativos informatizados [Requirements, applications, and investigation in computerized adaptive testing]. Apuntes de Psicologia, 19, 11-28.

Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2003). Tests adaptativos informatizados (Computerized adaptive testing). Madrid: UNED Ediciones.

Olea, J., Abad, F. J., & Barrada, J. R.. (2010). Tests informatizados y otros nuevos tipos de tests [Computerized and other new types of tests]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 94-107.

Olea, J., Revuelta, J., Ximenez, M. C., & Abad, F. J.. (2000). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicolgia, 21, 157-173.

Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Wise, S. L.. (1995). Tests adaptivos y autoadaptados informatizados: Effects en la ansiedad y en la pecision de las estimaciones [SATs and CATS: Effects on enxiety and estimate precision]. In Paper presented at the Fourth Symposium de Metodologia de las Ciencies del Comportamiento. Murcia, Spain.

Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Prieto, G., E.. (1999). Tests informatizados: Fundamentos y aplicaciones (Computerized testing: Fundamentals and applications. Madrid: Pirmide.