Crotts, K. M., Zenisky, A. L., Sireci, S. G., & Li, X.. (2013). Estimating Measurement Precision in Reduced-Length Multi-Stage Adaptive Testing . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(4), 67-87. doi:10.7333/1309-0104067

Divgi, D. R. (1989). Estimating Reliabilities of Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 145-149.

Sympson, J. B. (1980). Estimating the reliability of adaptive tests from a single test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston.

Penfield, R. D. (2007). Estimating the Standard Error of the Maximum Likelihood Ability Estimator in Adaptive Testing Using the Posterior-Weighted Test Information Function. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 958-975. doi:10.1177/0013164407301544

Kirisci, L. (1992). Estimation of ability level by using only observable quantities in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting if the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Lee, Y. H., Park, J. H., & Park, I. Y.. (2006). Estimation of an examinee's ability in the web-based computerized adaptive testing program IRT-CAT. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 3, 4.

Sykes, R., & Ito, K.. (1995). Estimation of item difficulty from restricted CAT calibration samples. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education in San Francisco.

Sympson, J. B. (1977). Estimation of latent trait status in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Glas, C. A. W., van der Linden, W. J., & Geerlings, H.. (2010). Estimation of the Parameters in an Item-Cloning Model for Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 289-314). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.

Carlson, S. (2000). ETS finds flaws in the way online GRE rates some students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, a47.

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2002). Étude de la distribution d'échantillonnage de l'estimateur du niveau d'habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d'arrêt dans le contexte de l'application du modèle de Rasch [Study of the sampling distribution of the proficiecy estima. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 24(2-3), 23-40.

Auger, R. (1989). Étude de praticabilité du testing adaptatif de maîtrise des apprentissages scolaires au Québec : une expérimentation en éducation économique secondaire 5. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Montréal : Université du Québec à Montréal. [In French].

Lu, Y., & Robin, F.. (2003). Evaluating a new approach to detect aberrant responses in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Bennett, R. E., Steffen, M., Singley, M. K., Morley, M., & Jacquemin, D.. (1997). Evaluating an automatically scorable, open-ended response type for measuring mathematical reasoning in computer-adaptive tests.

Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Evaluating and insuring measurement precision in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Wang, T., & Kolen, M. J.. (1997). Evaluating comparability in computerized adaptive testing: A theoretical framework with an example. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Zhang, J., & Lu, T.. (2003). Evaluating computer-based test security by generalized item overlap rates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Lu, Y., Pitoniak, M., Rizavi, S., Way, W. D., & Steffan, M.. (2003). Evaluating computerized adaptive testing design for the MCAT with realistic simulated data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Webb, N. L.. (2015). Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094

Hetter, R. D., Segall, D. O., & Bloxom, B. M.. (1997). Evaluating item calibration medium in computerized adaptive testing. In . W.A. Sands, B.K. Waters and J.R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 161-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Guo, F., & Wang, L.. (2004). Evaluating scale stability of a computer adaptive testing system (No. 05-12). McLean, VA: GMAC.

Thomasson, G. L. (2003). Evaluating stability of online item calibrations under varying conditions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Puhan, G., & Gierl, M.. (2003). Evaluating the comparability of English- and French-speaking examinees on a science achievement test administered using two-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Zenisky, A. L. (2004). Evaluating the effects of several multi-stage testing design variables on selected psychometric outcomes for certification and licensure assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Sympson, J. B. (1975). Evaluating the results of computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 26-31. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kreiter, C. D., Ferguson, K., & Gruppen, L. D.. (1999). Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment. Academic Medicine, 74, 1125-8. presented at the Oct.

Curran, L. T., & Wise, L. L.. (1994). Evaluation and implementation of CAT-ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles.

Laurier, M. (2004). Évaluation et multimédia dans l'apprentissage d'une L2 [Assessment and multimedia in learning an L2]. ReCALL, 16, 475-487.

Fliege, H., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., & Klapp, B. F.. (2009). Evaluation of a computer-adaptive test for the assessment of depression (D-CAT) in clinical application. International Journal for Methods in Psychiatric Research, 18, 233-236. presented at the Feb 4.

Cui, Z., Liu, C., He, Y., & Chen, H.. (2018). Evaluation of a New Method for Providing Full Review Opportunities in Computerized Adaptive Testing—Computerized Adaptive Testing With Salt. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 582-594. doi:10.1111/jedm.12193

Ito, K., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D.. (2009). An evaluation of a new procedure for computing information functions for Bayesian scores from computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J., Warejr, J., Sullivan, E., & Straus, W.. (2006). An evaluation of a patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing osteoarthritis impact. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 715-723.

Reese, L. M., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1996). An evaluation of a two-stage testlet design for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.

Hogan, P. F., McBride, J. R., & Curran, L. T.. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.

McBride, J. R., & Hogan, P. F.. (1992). Evaluation of alternative operational concepts. In . Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Archer, R. P., Tirrell, C. A., & Elkins, D. E.. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.

Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C.. (2007). Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.

McBride, J. R. (1979). An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 21st Military Testing Association Conference. SanDiego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Hardwicke, S., Vicino, F., McBride, J. R., & Nemeth, C.. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.

French, B. F., & Thompson, T. T.. (2003). The evaluation of exposure control procedures for an operational CAT. . In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Cliff, N., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D. J.. (1979). Evaluation of Implied Orders as a Basis for Tailored Testing with Simulation Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(4), 495-514.

Cliff, N. A., & McCormick, D.. (1979). Evaluation of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing with simulation data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 495-514.

Steffen, M., & Liu, M.. (1998). Evaluation of methods for the use of underutilized items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1983). An evaluation of one- and three-parameter logistic tailored testing procedures for use with small item pools (Research Report ONR83-1). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Thompson, N., & Stoeger, J.. (2017). Evaluation of Parameter Recovery, Drift, and DIF with CAT Data. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F7HCZWD28Q97sCKFIJB0Yps0H66NPeKq

Kocalevent, R. D., Rose, M., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., et al.. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.

van Rijn, P. W., Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F.. (2002). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.

van Rijn, P. W., Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F.. (2002). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (2004). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.

Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Florida State University.

Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 (7-A), 4257.

Paterson, J. J. (1962). An evaluation of the sequential method of testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Vicino, F. L., & Hardwicke, S. B.. (1984). An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Vicino, F. L., & Hardwicke, S. B.. (1984). An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2006). Evaluation parameters for computer adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37(No 2), 261-278.

Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). Evaluation plan for the computerized adaptive vocational aptitude battery (Research Report 82-1).

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.

Walker, C. M., & Ackerman, T. A.. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Walker, C. M., Beretvas, S. N., & Ackerman, T. A.. (2001). An examination of conditioning variables used in computer adaptive testing for DIF analyses. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 3-16.