Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.. (2002). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Elements of Adaptive Testing (p. 437). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Cliff, N. A. (1976). Elements of a basic test theory generalizable to tailored testing. Unpublished manuscript.

Revuelta, J. (1995). El control de la exposicin de los items en tests adaptativos informatizados [Item exposure control in computerized adaptive tests]. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Universidad Autonma de Madrid, Spain.

Samejima, F. (2001). Efficient on-line item calibration using a nonparametric method adjusted to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T.. (1993). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T., & Moser, U.. (2017). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ko2LuiARKqsjL_6aupO4Pj9zgk6p_xhd/view?usp=sharing

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Moser, U.. (2019). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs Under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 121-146. doi:10.1111/jedm.12203

Choi, S., Reise, S. P., Pilkonis, P. A., Hays, R. D., & Cella, D.. (2010). Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 125–136.

Han, S. - Y., & Yoo, Y. Joo. (2017). Efficiency of Item Selection in CD-CAT Based on Conjunctive Bayesian Network Modeling Hierarchical attributes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RbO2gd4aULqsSgRi_VZudNN_edX82NeD

Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Han, K. T. (2012). An Efficiency Balanced Information Criterion for Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 225–246. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00173.x

Allen, D. D., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M.. (2008). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.

Loyd, B. H. (1984). Efficiency and precision in two-stage adaptive testing. West Palm Beach Florida: Eastern ERA.

Wood, R. L. (1969). The efficacy of tailored testing. Educational Research, 11, 219-222.

Frey, A., Hartig, J., & Moosbrugger, H.. (2009). Effekte des adaptiven Testens auf die Moti¬vation zur Testbearbeitung [Effects of adaptive testing on test taking motivation].. Diagnostica, 55, 20-28.

Hankins, J. A. (1990). The effects of variable entry on bias and information of the Bayesian adaptive testing procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 785-802.

Hankins, J. A. (1987). The effects of variable entry on bias and information of the Bayesian adaptive testing procedure. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47 (8A), 3013.

Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., Rodriguez, M. S., & Revuelta, J.. (1999). The effects of test difficulty manipulation in computerized adaptive testing and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 167-184.

Yi, Q., Harris, D. J., Wang, T., & Ban, J. - C.. (2003). Effects of test administration mode on item parameter estimates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Featherman, C. M., Subhiyah, R. G., & Hadadi, A.. (1996). Effects of randomesque item selection on CAT item exposure rates and proficiency estimation under 1- and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.

Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Effects of program parameters and item pool characteristics on the bias of a three-parameter tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Boston MA, U.

Chen, S. - Y., & Ankenmann, R. D.. (2004). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.

Nering, M. L. (1996). The effects of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Ban, J. C., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2000). Effects of nonequivalence of item pools on ability estimates in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Segall, D. O. (1997). The effects of motivation on equating adaptive and conventional tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Jiao, H. (2003). The effects of model specification error in item response theory-based computerized classification test using sequential probability ratio test. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 64, 478.

Jiao, H., & Lau, A. C.. (2003). The effects of model misfit in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.

Hou, L., Chen, S., G., D. B., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1996). The effects of methods of theta estimation, prior distribution, and number of quadrature points on CAT using the graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York NY.

Prestwood, J. S. (1977). Effects of Knowledge of Results and Varying Proportion Correct on Ability Test Performance and Psychological Variables. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J. A.. (2000). Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Research Report 2000-8). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.

Haynie, K. A., & Way, W. D.. (1994). The effects of item pool depth on the accuracy of pass/fail decisions for NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.

Mattson, J. D. (1983). Effects of item parameter error and other factors on trait estimation in latent trait based adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Segall, D. O. (1995). The effects of item compromise on computerized adaptive test scores. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Orlando, FL.

Ree, M. J. (1981). The Effects of Item Calibration Sample Size and Item Pool Size on Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5(1), 11-19.

Betz, N. E. (1977). Effects of Immediate Knowledge of Results and Adaptive Testing on Ability Test Performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 259-266.

Betz, N. E. (1977). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 259-266.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S., & Wise, S. L.. (1992). The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. San Francisco.

Holst, P. M., O’Donnell, A. M., & Rocklin, T. R.. (1992). Effects of feedback during self-adapted testing on estimates of ability. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Yang, X., Poggio, J. C., & Glasnapp, D. R.. (2006). Effects of Estimation Bias on Multiple-Category Classification With an IRT-Based Adaptive Classification Procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 545-564. doi:10.1177/0013164405284031

Kalender, I. (2011). Effects of Different Computerized Adaptive Testing Strategies of Recovery of Ability. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.

Pine, S. M., Church, A. T., Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Arrowwood, V. E. (1994). Effects of computerized adaptive test anxiety on nursing licensure examinations. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences), 54 (9-A), 3410.

Lee, J. A. (1986). The effects of computer experience on computerized adaptive test performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 727-733.

Chang, S. - W., & Twu, B. - Y.. (2001). Effects of changes in the examinees’ ability distribution on the exposure control methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Vispoel, W., Forte, E., & Boo, J.. (1996). Effects of answer review and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

Vispoel, W. P., Brunsman, B., Forte, E., & Bleiler, T.. (1996). Effects of answer feedback and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.

Rocklin, T. R., O’Donnell, A. M., & Holst, P. M.. (1995). Effects and underlying mechanisms of self-adapted testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 103-116.

Zhang, J., & Chang, H.. (2005). The effectiveness of using multiple item pools in computerized adaptive testing. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education . presented at the 04/2005, Montreal, Canada.

Gugel, J. F., Schmidt, F. L., & Urry, V. W.. (1976). Effectiveness of the ancillary estimation procedure. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 103-106). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Samejima, F. (2001). Effective use of simulated data in an on-line item calibration in practical situations of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Pommerich, M. (2007). The Effect of Using Item Parameters Calibrated from Paper Administrations in Computer Adaptive Test Administrations. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5.

Pommerich, M. (2007). The effect of using item parameters calibrated from paper administrations in computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment.

Cheng, Y., & Liu, C.. (2015). The Effect of Upper and Lower Asymptotes of IRT Models on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 551-565. doi:10.1177/0146621615585850

Rizavi, S. M. (2002). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.

Rizavi, S., & Swaminathan, H.. (2001). The effect of test and examinee characteristics on the occurrence of aberrant response patterns in a computerized adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characterstics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.

Lunz, M. E., & Stone, G. E.. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(3), 211-222.

Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The effect of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.