Zheng, Y., & Chang, H. - H.. (2015). On-the-Fly Assembled Multistage Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 104-118. doi:10.1177/0146621614544519

Liu, S., Cai, Y., & Tu, D.. (2018). On-the-Fly Constraint-Controlled Assembly Methods for Multistage Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 595-613. doi:10.1111/jedm.12194

Gorham, W. A. (1976). Opening remarks. In . W. H. Gorham (Chair), Computers and testing: Steps toward the inevitable conquest (PS 76-1). Symposium presented at the 83rd annual convention of the APA, Chicago IL. Washington DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Developement Center.

Patience, W. M.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Operational characteristics of a one-parameter tailored testing procedure. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, August 1980, 10, 66 (Ms No. 2104).

Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Operational characteristics of a Rasch model tailored testing procedure when program parameters and item pool attributes are varied. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Koch, W. R., & G., D. B.. (1986). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using partial credit scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 129-143.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & De Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational Characteristics of Adaptive Testing Procedures Using the Graded Response Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 129-143.

Segal, H. (1977). Operational Considerations in Implementing Tailored Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2006). Optimal and nonoptimal computer-based test designs for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 221-239.

Verschoor, A. (2011). Optimal Calibration Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Wiberg, M. (2003). An optimal design approach to criterion-referenced computerized testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 97-100.

Buyske, S. G. (1999). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1998). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 271-279.

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1996). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 96-34). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wolfe, J. H. (1981). Optimal item difficulty for the three-parameter normal ogive model. Psychometrika, 46, 461-464.

Yang, L., & Reckase, M. D.. (2020). The Optimal Item Pool Design in Multistage Computerized Adaptive Tests With the p-Optimality Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80, 955-974. doi:10.1177/0013164419901292

Choi, S. W., Moellering, K. T., Li, J., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2016). Optimal Reassembly of Shadow Tests in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 469-485. doi:10.1177/0146621616654597

Vos, H. J. (1998). Optimal sequential rules for computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(2), 133-154.

van der Linden, W. J. (2000). Optimal stratification of item pools in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 00-07). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.

van der Linden, W. J. (1998). Optimal test assembly of psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 195-211.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2004). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Report 2004-2). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito Group.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A.. (2003). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment. Manchester UK.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393. doi:10.1177/0146621606288890

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). Optimal Testlet Pool Assembly for Multistage Testing Designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 204-215. doi:10.1177/0146621605284350

Cordova, M. J. (1997). Optimization methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick NJ.

Makransky, G., & Glas, C. A. W.. (In Press). Optimizing cognitive ability measurement with multidimensional computer adaptive testing. International Journal of Testing.

Chajewski, M., & Lewis, C.. (2009). Optimizing item exposure control algorithms for polytomous computerized adaptive tests with restricted item banks. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Wen, J. - B., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2002). Optimum number of strata in the a-stratified adaptive testing design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Meijer, R. R. (2002). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.

Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E.. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.

Eggen, T. (2001). Overexposure and underexposure of items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2001-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO Groep.

Wise, S. L. (1997). Overview of practical issues in a CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Teresi, J. A. (2006). Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications. Medical Care, 44, S39-49. presented at the Nov.

Olivier, P. (1973). An overview of tailored testing (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Program of Educational Evaluation and Research Design.

Ponsoda, V. (2000). Overview of the computerized adaptive testing special section. Psicológica, 21, 115-120.

Pashley, P. (1997). An overview of the LSAC CAT research agenda. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (1997). Overview of the USMLE Step 2 computerized field test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Kim, J., Chung, H., Dodd, B. G., & Park, R.. (2012). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977

Lord, F. M. (1978). Panel discussion: Future directions for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Item Response Theory and Computerized adaptive conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Zara, A. (2011). A Paradigm for Multinational Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Johnson, M. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Parallel forms reliability and measurement accuracy comparison of adaptive and conventional testing strategies. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 16-34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kang, H. - A., & Chang, H. - H.. (2016). Parameter Drift Detection in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Informational Distance/Divergence Measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 534-550. doi:10.1177/0146621616663676

Desmarais, M. C., Pu, X,, & Blais, J. - G.. (2007). Partial order knowledge structures for CAT applications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Tejada, R., & Antonio, J.. (2001). Pasado, presente y futuro de los test adaptativos informatizados: Entrevista con Isaac I. Béjar [Past, present and future of computerized adaptive testing: Interview with Isaac I. Béjar]. Psicothema, 13, 685-690.

Immekus, J. C., Gibbons, R. D., & Rush, J. A.. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and computerized adaptive testing: An application of post-hoc simulation to a diagnostic screening instrument. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chang, C. - H. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 157-66.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R. C., Cook, K. F., Reeve, B., et al.. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45, S3-S11.

Robinson, D., Porporino, F. J., & Millson, W. A.. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

Lunz, M. E., & Stahl, J. A.. (1998). Patterns of item exposure using a randomized CAT algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Chang, H. - H., Chang, S., & Ansley,. (2000). Performance of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing: Further explorations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans , LA.

Pastor, D. A., Chiang, C., Dodd, B. G., & and Yockey, R.. (1999). Performance of the Sympson-Hetter exposure control algorithm with a polytomous item bank. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1998). Person fit based on statistical process control in an adaptive testing environment (Research Report 98-13). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Trabin, T. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). The person response curve: Fit of individuals to item response theory models. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 83-108). New York: Academic Press.

Economides, A. A. (2005). Personalized feedback in CAT. In . WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, Issue 3, Volume 2,174-181, July 2005.

David, L. A., & Lewis, C.. (1996). Person-fit indices and their role in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

McLeod, L. D., & Lewis, C.. (1996). Person-fit indices and their role in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

Taherbhai, H., & Seo, D.. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000