Segall, D. O. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Experiences and lessons learned. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Segall, D. O., & Davey, T. C.. (1995). Some new methods for content balancing adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Segall, D. O. (2004). A sharing item response theory model for computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 439-460. presented at the Win.

Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (1999). Development of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. In . F. Drasgow and J. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Segall, D. O. (2001). Measuring test compromise in high-stakes computerized adaptive testing: A Bayesian Strategy for surrogate test-taker detection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Segall, D. O., & Carter, G.. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Issues and approach. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Segall, D. O. (2002). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.

Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (1997). Current and future challenges. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp 257-269). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (1997). Applications of multidimensional adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Kieckhaefer, W. F., Vicino, F. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Validation of the experimental CAT-ASVAB system. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (2003). Calibrating CAT item pools and online pretest items using MCMC methods. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Seguin, S. P. (1976). An exploratory studyof the efficiency of the flexilevel testing procedure. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Sekula-Wacura, R. (2000). A review of CAT review. Popular Measurement, 3, 47-49.

Seo, D. Gi. (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing

Seo, D. Gi, & Weiss, D. J.. (2015). Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 954-978. doi:10.1177/0013164415575147

Sheehan, K.,, & Lewis, C.. (1992). Computerized mastery testing with nonequivalent testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 65-76.

Sheehan, K., & Lewis, C.. (1992). Computerized Mastery Testing With Nonequivalent Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 65-76.

Shen, Y., Bao, Y., Wang, S., & Bradshaw, L.. (2017). Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Detect Students’ Misconceptions: Exploration of Item Selection. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Sheng, Y., Flournoy, N., & Osterlind, S. J.. (2007). Up-and-down procedures for approximating optimal designs using person-response functions. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Sheng, Y., & Sheng, Z.. (2009). Item selection with biased-coin up-and-down designs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Shermis, M. D. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. In .

Shermis, M. D. (1986). A computer-adaptive placement test for college mathematics. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Shermis, M. D., Stemmer, P. M., & Webb, P. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive skill assessment in a statewide testing program. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(1), 49-67.

Shermis, M. D., & et. al.,. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for reading assessment and diagnostic assessment. Journal of Developmental Education, 18-20.

Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H., Brown, M., & Lillig, C.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. (ERIC No. ED414536).

Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H., & Bublitz, S.. (1997). Controlling test and computer anxiety: Test performance under CAT and SAT conditions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Shi, Y. (2017). Item Response Time on Task Effect in CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Shi, Y. (2017). Response Time and Response Accuracy in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yYP01bzGrKvJnfLwepcAoQQ2F4TdSvZ2

Shiba, S., Noguchi, H., & Haebra, T.. (1978). A stratified adaptive test of verbal ability. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 229-238.

Shih, H. - J., & Wang, W. - C.. (2009). Computerized adaptive testing using the two parameter logistic model with ability-based guessing. In Paper presented at the International Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Cambridge.

Shudong Wang,, Hong Jiao,, Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J.. (2008). Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 5-24. doi:10.1177/0013164407305592

Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu, Y.. (2002). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu.,. (2001). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in a realistic second-order equitable CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Riley, B., & Smits, N.. (2015). Utilizing Response Times in Computerized Classification Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 389-405. doi:10.1177/0146621615569504

Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Bartroff, J., & Thompson, N. A.. (2015). Stochastic Curtailment in Adaptive Mastery Testing: Improving the Efficiency of Confidence Interval–Based Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 278-292. doi:10.1177/0146621614561314

Siebens, H., Andres, P. L., Pengsheng, N., Coster, W. J., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.

Siegmund, D. (1985). Sequential analysis: Tests and confidence intervals. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Sijtsma, K. (2001). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.

Simms, L. J.,, & Clark, L. A.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive testing version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 28-43.

Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H.. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380-389.

Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. J.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule of Non-Adaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17, 28-43.

Simms, L. J. (2002). DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF A COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE VERSION OF THE SCHEDULE FOR NONADAPTIVE AND ADAPTIVE PERSONALITY. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City Iowa.

Simms, L. J. (2003). Development, reliability, and validity of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 63, 3485.

Simms, L. (2001). Testing a computerized adaptive personality inventory using simulated response data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. San Francisco CA.

Singh, J. (1993). Some initial experiments with adaptive survey designs for structured questionnaires. In Paper presented at the New Methods and Applications in Consumer Research Conference. Cambridge MA.

Singh, J., Howell, R. D., & Rhoads, G. K.. (1990). Adaptive designs for Likert-type data: An approach for implementing marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 304-321.

Sinharay, S., Wan, P., Whitaker, M., Kim, D. - I., Zhang, L., & Choi, S. W.. (2014). Determining the Overall Impact of Interruptions During Online Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 419–440. doi:10.1111/jedm.12052

Sinharay, S., Wan, P., Choi, S. W., & Kim, D. - I.. (2015). Assessing Individual-Level Impact of Interruptions During Online Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 80–105. doi:10.1111/jedm.12064

Sireci, S. G., & Clauser, B. E.. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Sireci, S. G., Wainer, H.,, & Thissen, D.. (1991). On the reliability of testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 237-247.

Slater, S. C., & Schaffer, G. A.. (1996). Computing scores for incomplete GRE General computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Slutske, W. S., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1988). A real-data simulation of adaptive MMPI administration. In Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on recent developments in the use of the MMPI. St. Petersburg FL.

Smith, R. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). A Bayesian computerized mastery model with multiple cut scores. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.

Smith, R., & Zhu, R.. (1999). More efficient use of item inventories. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Smith, R. L., Wang, M. M., Wingersky, M., & Zhao, C.. (2001). Monitoring items for changes in performance in computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle, Washington.

Smith, R. W., Plake, B. S., & de Ayala, R. J.. (2001). Item and passage selection algorithm simulations for a computerized adaptive version of the verbal section of the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). MCAT Monograph Series.

Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1998). Expected losses for individuals in Computerized Mastery Testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.

Smith, R. L., Rizavi, S., Paez, R., Damiano, M., & Herbert, E.. (2003). Maintaining scale in computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Smith, R. W. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.

Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1997). Incorporating decision consistency into Bayesian sequential testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.