Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
E
Loyd, B. H. (1984). Efficiency and precision in two-stage adaptive testing. West Palm Beach Florida: Eastern ERA.
Han, K. T. (2012). An Efficiency Balanced Information Criterion for Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 225–246. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00173.x
Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon gi79-06.pdf (2.72 MB)
Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T.. (1993). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Samejima, F. (2001). Efficient on-line item calibration using a nonparametric method adjusted to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Elements of Adaptive Testing (p. 437). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Zwick, R. (1998). An empirical Bayes approach to Mantel-Haenszel DIF analysis: Theoretical development and application to CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.
Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ki02-01.pdf (133.01 KB)
Rocklin, T. R., & O’Donnell, A. M.. (1991). An empirical comparison of self-adapted and maximum information item selection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 75-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon la75-01.pdf (1.73 MB)
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1977). An empirical evaluation of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon cl77048.pdf (779.84 KB)
Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). An empirical investigation of computer-administered pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 74-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon la74-03.pdf (2.97 MB)
Kocher, A. T. (1974). An empirical investigation of the stability and accuracy of flexilevel tests. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 03/1074, Chicago IL.
PDF icon v01n1p141.pdf (725.15 KB)
Waters, B. K. (1976). An empirical investigation of Weiss' stradaptive testing model. In . C. L. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 54-63.). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission.
PDF icon wa75-01.pdf (575.27 KB)
Lee, S. (2017). An Empirical Simulation Study Using mstR for MST Designs. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Kreitzberg, C. B., & Jones, D. J.. (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon be73-04.pdf (2.45 MB)
Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1994). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.
Ben-Porath, Y. S., Roper, B. L., & Butcher, J. N.. (1990). An empirical study of the computer adaptive MMPI-2. In Paper presented at the 25th Annual Symposium on recent developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2. Minneapolis MN.
Thompson, T. (2002). Employing new ideas in CAT to a simulated reading test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon to02-01.pdf (215.33 KB)
Wang, C., Zheng, C., & Chang, H. - H.. (2014). An Enhanced Approach to Combine Item Response Theory With Cognitive Diagnosis in Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 358–380. doi:10.1111/jedm.12057
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (1999). An enhanced stratified computerized adaptive testing design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
PDF icon le99-01.pdf (477.89 KB)
Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2014). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545
Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1995). Equating computerized adaptive certification examinations: The Board of Registry series of studies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
van der Linden, W. J. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.
Segall, D. O. (1997). Equating the CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 181-198). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Segall, D. O. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Experiences and lessons learned. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
Segall, D. O., & Carter, G.. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Issues and approach. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
McBride, J. R. (1995). Equating the computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco. CA.
McBride, J. R., Corpe, V. A., & Wing, H.. (1987). Equating the computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.
Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.
Stoloff, P. H. (1985). Equivalence of scores from computerized adaptive and paper-and-pencil ASVAB tests (No. CNR 113) (p. 100). Alexandria, VA. USA: Center for Naval Analysis.
Wang, T., Lau, C., & Hanson, B. A.. (1998). Essentially unbiased Bayesian estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
Wang, T. (1997). Essentially unbiased EAP estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
PDF icon wa97-01.pdf (224.35 KB)
Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., & Amoss, K. E.. (1994). Establishing the comparability of the NCLEX using CAT with traditional NCLEX examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
Reese, C. M. (1993). Establishing time limits for the GRE computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Revuelta, J. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.

Pages