Implications from information functions and standard errors for determining preferred normed scales for CAT and P and P ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Some reliability estimators for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
. (1998). Some reliability estimates for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 239-47.
. (1999). Issues in maintaining scale consistency for the CAT-ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). . (1980).
A Japanese Adaptive Test of English as a Foreign Language: Developmental and Operational Aspects. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 191-211). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). . (2001).
Bayesian methods in psychological testing (Research Bulletin RB-69-31). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1969). Discussion: Session 3. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 140-143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.
. (1980). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Técnicas para detectar patrones de respuesta atípicos [Aberrant patterns detection methods]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 143-154.
. (2006). A hybrid simulation procedure for the development of CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The Sequential Probability Ratio Test and Binary Item Response Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 203-230. doi:10.3102/1076998614524824
. (2014). The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 131-151.
. (2000). Tests adaptivos y autoadaptados informatizados: Effects en la ansiedad y en la pecision de las estimaciones [SATs and CATS: Effects on enxiety and estimate precision]. In Paper presented at the Fourth Symposium de Metodologia de las Ciencies del Comportamiento. Murcia, Spain.
. (1995). Test adaptativos informatizados [Computerized adaptive testing]. In Psicometría. Madrid, UNED: Universitas.
. (1996). . (1999).
Tests informatizados y otros nuevos tipos de tests [Computerized and other new types of tests]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 94-107.
. (2010). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicolgia, 21, 157-173.
. (2000). Tests adaptativos informatizados (Computerized adaptive testing). Madrid: UNED Ediciones.
. (2003). . (2001).
. (1996).
An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 (7-A), 4257.
. (1974). An overview of tailored testing (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Program of Educational Evaluation and Research Design.
. (1973). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Florida State University.
. (1974). Comparison and equating of paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive tests of achievement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1986). Validity and decision issues in selecting a CAT measurement model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Comparisons of paper-administered, computer-administered and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 311-326.
. (1989). . (2002).
Applying computerized adaptive testing in schools. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 311-38.
. (1990). Computerized Testing (Research Report 94-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1994). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Dissertational Abstracts International, 1982, 42,(10-B), 4233.
. (1981). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4233.
. (1982). Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 144-154. doi:10.1177/0146621614559517
. (2015). . (1997).
A Bayesian approach to tailored testing (Research Report 69-92). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1969). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351-356.
. (1975). Bayesian sequential design and analysis of dichotomous experiments with special reference to mental testing. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1979). Measurement efficiency for fixed-precision multidimensional computerized adaptive tests: Comparing health measurement and educational testing using example banks. Applied Psychological Measurement.
. (In Press). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 68-83. doi:10.1177/0146621618765719
. (2019). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3
. (2017). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Measuring patient-reported outcomes adaptively: Multidimensionality matters!. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621617733954
. (2018). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
An approach to implementing adaptive testing using item response theory both offline and online. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
. (2005). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.
. (2002). A “rearrangement procedure” for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A “Rearrangement Procedure†For Scoring Adaptive Tests with Review Options. International Journal of Testing, 7, 387-407. doi:10.1080/15305050701632262
. (2007). A rearrangement procedure for administering adaptive tests when review options are permitted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
. (2001). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545
. (2014). The Development of MST Test Information for the Prediction of Test Performances. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 570-586. doi:10.1177/0013164416662960
. (2017). A new delivery system for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1990). Item exposure control in computer-adaptive testing: The use of freezing to augment stratification. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 40, 28-52.
. (2000). Test development exposure control for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1998). Designing templates based on a taxonomy of innovative items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Sufficient simplicity or comprehensive complexity? A comparison of probabilitic and stratification methods of exposure control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). Innovative Items for Computerized Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 215-230). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Item development and pretesting in a computer-based testing environment. In Paper presented at the Educational Testing Service Sponsored Colloquium on Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments. Philadelphia.
. (1998). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In . In W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer (in press).
. (2002). Nearest neighbors, simple strata, and probabilistic parameters: An empirical comparison of methods for item exposure control in CATs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2001). Item exposure in adaptive tests: An empirical investigation of control strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.
. (1999).