Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
D
Dodd, B. G., de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R.. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 5–22.
Dodd, B. G., De Ayala, R. J., & Koch. W.R.,. (1995). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(1), 5-22.
PDF icon v19n1p005.pdf (1.4 MB)
Do, B. - R., Chuah, S. C., & Drasgow, F.. (2004). Item parameter recovery with adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
PDF icon do04-01.pdf (378.66 KB)
Divgi, D. R. (1989). Estimating Reliabilities of Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 145-149.
PDF icon v13n2p145.pdf (655.37 KB)
Diones, R., & Everson, H.. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: Assessment of the future. Curriculum/Technology Quarterly, 4 (2), 1-3.
Diao, Q., & Ren, H.. (2018). Constructing Shadow Tests in Variable-Length Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 538-552. doi:10.1177/0146621617753736
Diao, Q., & Reckase, M.. (2009). Comparison of ability estimation and item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09diao.pdf (341.8 KB)
Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157
DeWitt, L. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 104-107.
Desmarais, M. C., & Pu, X.. (2005). A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.
Desmarais, M. C., Pu, X,, & Blais, J. - G.. (2007). Partial order knowledge structures for CAT applications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07desmarais.pdf (474.93 KB)
Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x
Deng, H., & Chang, H. - H.. (2001). a-stratified computerized adaptive testing with unequal item exposure across strata. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Deng, H., & Ansley, T.. (2003). To stratify or not: An investigation of CAT item selection procedures under practical constraints. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon de03-01.pdf (185.22 KB)
DeMars, C. E. (2022). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008
De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon de74-1.pdf (2.67 MB)
De la Torre, R., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1991). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive testing system. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
De Champlain, A. F. (2017). Using Automated Item Generation in a Large-scale Medical Licensure Exam Program: Lessons Learned. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08.2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=14N8hUc8qexAy5W_94TykEDABGVIJHG1h
De Beer, M. (2000). The construction and evaluation of a dynamic computerised adaptive test for the measurement of learning potential. Unpublished D. Litt et Phil dissertation. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
De Beer, M. (2003). A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.
PDF icon debe03-01.pdf (390.1 KB)
De Beer, M. (2002). Utility of Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT) scores in predicting academic performance of bridging students: A comparison with other predictors. In Paper presented at the 5th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology Congress. Pretoria, South Africa.
De Beer, M. (2007). Use of CAT in dynamic testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat2007debeer.pdf (133.49 KB)
PDF icon debe03-02.pdf (562.16 KB)
De Ayals, R. J. (1992). The Nominal Response Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 327-343.
PDF icon v16n4p327.pdf (1.45 MB)
de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.
de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R.. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Washington DC.
de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.
PDF icon daxx-01.pdf (652.37 KB)
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon da03-01.pdf (619.88 KB)
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.
Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133
PDF icon da02-01.pdf (1.79 MB)
Davis, L. L., Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., Chiang, C., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2000). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
David, L. A., & Lewis, C.. (1996). Person-fit indices and their role in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Davey, T., & Fan, M.. (2000). Specific information item selection for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
Davey, T., & Nering, M.. (2002). Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In . C. N. Mills, M. T. Potenza, and J. J. Fremer (Eds.), Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments (pp. 165-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Davey, T., & Parshall, C. G.. (1995). New algorithms for item selection and exposure control with computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Davey, T., Nering, M., & Thompson, T.. (1997). Realistic simulation procedures for item response data. In In T. Miller (Chair), High-dimensional simulation of item response data for CAT research. Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.

Pages