Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
R
Raiche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2002). Practical considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a prior, adaptive corrections for bias, adaptive integration interval. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.
PDF icon ra02-01.pdf (99.92 KB)
Raîche, G.. (2002). Le testing adaptatif [Adaptive testing]. In . D. R. Bertrand and J.G. Blais (Eds) : Les théories modernes de la mesure [Modern theories of measurement]. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
PDF icon ra02-02.pdf (190.86 KB)
Raîche, G., & Béland, A.. (1994). L'évaluation nationale individualisée et assistée par ordinateur [Large scale assessment: Tailored and computerized]. In Québec: Proceeding of the 14th Congress of the Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale. Montréal: Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale (AQPC).
Raîche, G.. (1994). Utilisation de la simulation en tant que méthodologie de recherche [Simulation methodology in research]. In . Association pour la recherche au collégial (Ed.) : L'en-quête de la créativité [In quest of creativity]. Proceeding of the 6th Congress of the ARC. Montréal: Association pour la recherche au collégial (ARC).
PDF icon ra02-03.pdf (366.98 KB)
Raîche, G., Blais, J. G., & Magis, D.. (2007). Adaptive estimators of trait level in adaptive testing: Some proposals. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
Raîche, G.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure des étudiants : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif. In Commnication présentée à l’intérieur de la 23e session d’études de l’Association pour le dévelopement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation. ADMÉÉ.
Raîche, G, B. J. G., & Boiteau, N.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure pour chaque étudiant : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif par ordinateur en éducation [Tailored testing for each student : Principles and stakes of computerized adaptive testing in education]. In Presented at the 23th Study Session of the ADMÉÉ. Québec: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation (ADMÉÉ).
PDF icon ra02-04.pdf (29.76 KB)
Raîche, G.. (2001). Principes et enjeux du testing adaptatif : de la loi des petits nombres à la loi des grands nombres. In Communication présentée à l’intérieur du 69e congrès de l’Association canadienne française pour l’avancement de la science. Acfas.
Raîche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2002). Some features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Communication proposée au 11e Biannual International objective measurement workshop. New-Orleans : International Objective Measurement Workshops.
PDF icon bl02-01.pdf (37.17 KB)
Ray, R. D. (2004). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In R. W. Malott, Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Reckase, M. D. (1982). Discussion: Adaptive and sequential testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon re82-01.pdf (287.3 KB)
Reckase, M. D. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: a good idea waiting for the right technology. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, April 1988.
Reckase, M. D. (1974). An application of the Rasch simple logistic model to tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.. St. Loius MO.
Reckase, M. D. (1983). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
PDF icon Reckase '83.pdf (474.81 KB)
Reckase, M. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Reckase, M., Ju, U., & Kim, S.. (2019). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
Reckase, M. D. (1980). Some decision procedures for use with tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 79-100). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon re80-01.pdf (1.12 MB)
Reckase, M. D. (1986). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.
Reckase, M. D. (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
Reckase, M. D. (1978). A generalization of sequential analysis to decision making with tailored testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Military Testing Association. Oklahoma City OK.
Reckase, M. D. (1973). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the National Conference on the Us of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
Reckase, M. D. (2001). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Invited small group session at the 6th Conference of the European Association of Psychological Assessment. Aachen, Germany.
Reckase, M. D. (1976). Procedures for computerized testing. In Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the National Conference on the Use of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
Reckase, M. D. (2017). How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu
Reckase, M. D. (2003). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon re03-01.pdf (134.72 KB)
Reckase, M. D. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.
Reckase, M. D. (1976). The effect of item pool characteristics on the operation of a tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Murray Hill NJ.
Reckase, M. D. (2010). Designing item pools to optimize the functioning of a computerized adaptive test. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 127-141.
Reckase, M. D. (1977). Procedures for computerized testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 70, 351-356.
Reckase, M. D. (2007). The design of p-optimal item banks for computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF file, 211 KB}.
PDF icon cat07reckase.pdf (210.85 KB)
Reckase, M. D. (2000). Computerized testing – the adolescent years: Juvenile delinquent or positive role model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Reckase, M. D., He, W., Xu, J. - R., & Zhou, X.. (2017). Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs
Reckase, M. D. (1975). The effect of item choice on ability estimation when using a simple logistic tailored testing model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C.
Reckase, M. D. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.
Reckase, M. D., Thompson, T. D., & Nering, M.. (1997). Identifying similar item content clusters on multiple test forms. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg, TN, June.
PDF icon v05n1p011.pdf (707.62 KB)
Ree, M. J. (1977). Implementation of a Model Adaptive Testing System at an Armed Forces Entrance and Examination Station. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon re77216.pdf (312.3 KB)
Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
Reese, L. M., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1996). An evaluation of a two-stage testlet design for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Reese, C. M. (1993). Establishing time limits for the GRE computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G.. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48.

Pages