Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & De Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational Characteristics of Adaptive Testing Procedures Using the Graded Response Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 129-143.

Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 129-143.

Do, B. - R., Chuah, S. C., & Drasgow, F.. (2004). Item parameter recovery with adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Divgi, D. R. (1991). An analysis of CAT-ASVAB scores in the Marine Corps JPM data (CRM- 91-161). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analysis.

Divgi, D. R. (1987). Properties of some Bayesian scoring procedures for computerized adaptive tests (Research Memorandum CRM 87-161). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.

Divgi, D. R. (1986). Determining the sensitivity of CAT-ASVAB scores to changes in item response curves with the medium of administration (Report No.86-189). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.

Divgi, D. R. (1989). Estimating Reliabilities of Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 145-149.

Diones, R., & Everson, H.. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: Assessment of the future. Curriculum/Technology Quarterly, 4 (2), 1-3.

Dijkers, M. P. (2003). A computer adaptive testing simulation applied to the FIM instrument motor component. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84, 384-393.

Diao, Q., & Ren, H.. (2018). Constructing Shadow Tests in Variable-Length Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 538-552. doi:10.1177/0146621617753736

Diao, Q., & Reckase, M.. (2009). Comparison of ability estimation and item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157

DeWitt, L. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 104-107.

Desmarais, M. C., Pu, X,, & Blais, J. - G.. (2007). Partial order knowledge structures for CAT applications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Desmarais, M. C., & Pu, X.. (2005). A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.

Dennis, M. L., Funk, R., Titus, J., Riley, B. B., Hosman, S., & Kinne, S.. (2008). Developing a progressive approach to using the GAIN in order to reduce the duration and cost of assessment with the GAIN short screener, Quick and computer adaptive testing. In Joint Meeting on Adolescent Treatment Effectiveness . presented at the 2008, Washington D.C., USA.

Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x

Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and maximum information item selection procedures in computer adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202-226.

Deng, H., & Chang, H. - H.. (2001). a-stratified computerized adaptive testing with unequal item exposure across strata. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Deng, H., & Ansley, T.. (2003). To stratify or not: An investigation of CAT item selection procedures under practical constraints. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

DeMars, C. E. (2022). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008

Debeer, D., van Rijn, P. W., & Ali, U. S.. (2020). Multidimensional Test Assembly Using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming: An Application of Kullback–Leibler Information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 17-32. doi:10.1177/0146621619827586

De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

De la Torre, R., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1991). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive testing system. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

De Champlain, A. F. (2017). Using Automated Item Generation in a Large-scale Medical Licensure Exam Program: Lessons Learned. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08.2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=14N8hUc8qexAy5W_94TykEDABGVIJHG1h

De Beer, M. (2000). The construction and evaluation of a dynamic computerised adaptive test for the measurement of learning potential. Unpublished D. Litt et Phil dissertation. University of South Africa, Pretoria.

De Beer, M. (2000). Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT): User's Manual. Pretoria: UNISA.

De Beer, M. (2003). Development of the Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT). In Unpublished manuscript. .

De Beer, M. (2000). Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT): Technical Manual. Pretoria: UNISA.

De Beer, M. (2007). Use of CAT in dynamic testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

De Beer, M. (2003). A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.

De Beer, M. (2002). Utility of Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT) scores in predicting academic performance of bridging students: A comparison with other predictors. In Paper presented at the 5th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology Congress. Pretoria, South Africa.

De Ayals, R. J. (1992). The Nominal Response Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 327-343.

de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R.. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Washington DC.

de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.

de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.

de Ayala, R. J., Dodd, B. G., & Koch, W. R.. (1990). A simulation and comparison of flexilevel and Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 227-239.

De Ayala, R. J., Dodd, B. G., & Koch, W. R.. (1992). A comparison of the partial credit and graded response models in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 17-34.

de Ayala, R. J. (1989). A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model in computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 789-805.

de Ayala, R. J. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three parameter model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 3148.

de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R.. (1985). ALPHATAB: A lookup table for Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 326.

Davison, M. L., Semmes, R., Huang, L., & Close, C. N.. (2012). On the Reliability and Validity of a Numerical Reasoning Speed Dimension Derived From Response Times Collected in Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 245-263. doi:10.1177/0013164411408412

Davis, L. L., Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., Chiang, C., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (2003). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 24-42.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B.. (2005). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model. Pearson Educational Measurement Research Report 05-01.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2008). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 1-17.

Davis, L. L., Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., Chiang, C., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2000). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2001). An examination of testlet scoring and item exposure constraints in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. MCAT Monograph Series: Association of American Medical Colleges.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2001). An examination of testlet scoring and item exposure constraints in the Verbal Reasoning section of the MCAT. In .

Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133

Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185.

Davis, L. L. (2002). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.

Davis, K. M., Chang, C. - H., Lai, J. - S., & Cella, D.. (2002). Feasibility and acceptability of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for fatigue monitoring in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 11(7), 134.

David, L. A., & Lewis, C.. (1996). Person-fit indices and their role in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In Paper presented at an Educational Testing Service-sponsored colloquium entitled “Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments. ” Philadelphia PA.

Davey, T., & Thomas, L.. (1996). Constructing adaptive tests to parallel conventional programs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.

Davey, T., Godwin, J.,, & Mittelholz, D.. (1997). Developing and scoring an innovative computerized writing assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 21-41.

Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Evaluating and insuring measurement precision in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.