Nicewander, W. A., Chang, H. S., & Doody, E. N.. (1981). A comparison of two methods of interactive testing Final report. National Institute of Education Grant 79-1045.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Implications from information functions and standard errors for determining preferred normed scales for CAT and P and P ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1998). Some reliability estimators for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Some reliability estimates for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 239-47.

Nisbet, J., Adams, M., & Arthur, J.. (1980). A simple form of tailored testing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 301-303.

Nogami, Y., & Hayashi, N.. (2010). A Japanese Adaptive Test of English as a Foreign Language: Developmental and Operational Aspects. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 191-211). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Norris, J. M., Kenyon, D. M., & Malabonga, V.. (2001). Concerns with computerized adaptive oral proficiency assessment. A commentary on "Comparing examinee attitudes Toward computer-assisted and other oral proficient assessments": Response to the Norris Commentary. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 95-108.

Novick, M. R. (1980). Discussion: Session 3. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 140-143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.

Novick, M. R. (1969). Bayesian methods in psychological testing (Research Bulletin RB-69-31). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Núñez, R. M. N., & Pina, J. A. L.. (2006). Técnicas para detectar patrones de respuesta atípicos [Aberrant patterns detection methods]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 143-154.

Nydick, S. W., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). A hybrid simulation procedure for the development of CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Nydick, S. W. (2014). The Sequential Probability Ratio Test and Binary Item Response Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 203-230. doi:10.3102/1076998614524824

O'Neill, T., Lunz, M. E., & Thiede, K.. (2000). The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 131-151.

Olea, J., Abad, F. J., & Barrada, J. R.. (2010). Tests informatizados y otros nuevos tipos de tests [Computerized and other new types of tests]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 94-107.

Olea, J., Revuelta, J., Ximenez, M. C., & Abad, F. J.. (2000). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicolgia, 21, 157-173.

Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Wise, S. L.. (1995). Tests adaptivos y autoadaptados informatizados: Effects en la ansiedad y en la pecision de las estimaciones [SATs and CATS: Effects on enxiety and estimate precision]. In Paper presented at the Fourth Symposium de Metodologia de las Ciencies del Comportamiento. Murcia, Spain.

Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Prieto, G., E.. (1999). Tests informatizados: Fundamentos y aplicaciones (Computerized testing: Fundamentals and applications. Madrid: Pirmide.

Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (1996). Test adaptativos informatizados [Computerized adaptive testing]. In Psicometría. Madrid, UNED: Universitas.

Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2003). Tests adaptativos informatizados (Computerized adaptive testing). Madrid: UNED Ediciones.

Olea Díaz, J., Ponsoda Gil, V., Revuelta Menéndez, J., Hontangas Beltrán, P., & Abad, F. J.. (2001). Requerimientos, aplicaciones e investigación en tests adaptativos informatizados [Requirements, applications, and investigation in computerized adaptive testing]. Apuntes de Psicologia, 19, 11-28.

Olea., J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Belchi, J.. (1996). Propiedades psicometricas du un test adaptivo informatizado do vocabulario ingles [Psychometric properties of a computerized adaptive tests for the measurement of English vocabulary]. Estudios de Psicologica, 55, 61-73.

Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 (7-A), 4257.

Olivier, P. (1973). An overview of tailored testing (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Program of Educational Evaluation and Research Design.

Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Florida State University.

Olsen, J. B., & Bunderson, C. V.. (2007). Validity and decision issues in selecting a CAT measurement model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Olsen, J. B., Maynes, D. D., Slawson, D., & Ho, K.. (1986). Comparison and equating of paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive tests of achievement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Olson, J. B., Maynes, D. D., Slawson, D., & Ho, K.. (1989). Comparisons of paper-administered, computer-administered and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 311-326.

Olson, A. (2002). Technology solutions for testing. School Administrator, 4, 20-23.

Olson, J. B. (1990). Applying computerized adaptive testing in schools. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 311-38.

Oltman, P. K. (1994). Computerized Testing (Research Report 94-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Orban, J. A. (1982). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4233.

Orban, J. A. (1981). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Dissertational Abstracts International, 1982, 42,(10-B), 4233.

Oswald, F. L., Shaw, A., & Farmer, W. L.. (2015). Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 144-154. doi:10.1177/0146621614559517

Overton, R. C., Harms, H. J., Taylor, L. R., & Zickar, M. J.. (1997). Adapting to adaptive testing. Personnel Psychology, 50, 171-185.

Owen, R. J. (1969). A Bayesian approach to tailored testing (Research Report 69-92). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Owen, R. J. (1975). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351-356.

Owen, R. J. (1979). Bayesian sequential design and analysis of dichotomous experiments with special reference to mental testing. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Glas, C. A. W., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2018). Measuring patient-reported outcomes adaptively: Multidimensionality matters!. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621617733954

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (In Press). Measurement efficiency for fixed-precision multidimensional computerized adaptive tests: Comparing health measurement and educational testing using example banks. Applied Psychological Measurement.

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (2019). Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 68-83. doi:10.1177/0146621618765719

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2017). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3

Padaki, M., & Natarajan, V.. (2009). An approach to implementing adaptive testing using item response theory both offline and online. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.

Panter, A. T., & Reeve, B. B.. (2002). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.

Papanastasiou, E. C. (2001). A rearrangement procedure for administering adaptive tests when review options are permitted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Papanastasiou, E. C., & Reckase, M. D.. (2007). A “Rearrangement Procedure” For Scoring Adaptive Tests with Review Options. International Journal of Testing, 7, 387-407. doi:10.1080/15305050701632262

Papanastasiou, E. C. (2002). A “rearrangement procedure” for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2014). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545

Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2017). The Development of MST Test Information for the Prediction of Test Performances. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 570-586. doi:10.1177/0013164416662960

Park, J. (2007). A new delivery system for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Parker, S. B., & McBride, J. R.. (1990). A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.

Parshall, C., Hogarty, K., & Kromrey, J.. (1999). Item exposure in adaptive tests: An empirical investigation of control strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.

Parshall, C., Davey, T., Spray, J., & Kalohn, J.. (1999). Computerized testing – Issues and applications (Mini-course manual). In Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal.

Parshall, C. G., & Harmes, J. C.. (2007). Designing templates based on a taxonomy of innovative items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Parshall, C., Harmes, J. C., & Kromrey, J. D.. (2000). Item exposure control in computer-adaptive testing: The use of freezing to augment stratification. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 40, 28-52.

Parshall, C. G., Harmes, J. C., Davey, T., & Pashley, P. J.. (2010). Innovative Items for Computerized Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 215-230). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Test development exposure control for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Pashley, P.. (2002). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In . In W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer (in press).

Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., & Hogarty, K. Y.. (2000). Sufficient simplicity or comprehensive complexity? A comparison of probabilitic and stratification methods of exposure control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Parshall, C. G. (1998). Item development and pretesting in a computer-based testing environment. In Paper presented at the Educational Testing Service Sponsored Colloquium on Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments. Philadelphia.