. (2000). Assembling parallel item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
. (2000). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.
. (2000). CAT administration of language placement examinations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 292-302.
. (2000). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2000). CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (2000). Change in distribution of latent ability with item position in CAT sequence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education in New Orleans. LA.
kr00-01.pdf (102.42 KB). (2000). The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.
. (2000). Classification accuracy and test security for a computerized adaptive mastery test calibrated with different IRT models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.
. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). Computer-adaptive sequential testing. In . W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 289-209). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In , Development of Computerised Middle School Achievement Tests (Vol. 69). Chicago, IL. USA: MESA.
. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. MESA Memorandum No 9. Chicago : MESA psychometric laboratory, Unversity of Chicago.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive administration of the self-evaluation examination. AANA.J, 68, 226-31.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive rating scales (CARS): Development and evaluation of the concept. (Institute Rep No. 350). Tampa FL: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 713-34.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
. (2000). Computerized testing – the adolescent years: Juvenile delinquent or positive role model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp.27-52). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (2000). The construction and evaluation of a dynamic computerised adaptive test for the measurement of learning potential. Unpublished D. Litt et Phil dissertation. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
. (2000). Content balancing in stratified computerized adaptive testing designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
le00-01.pdf (426.85 KB). (2000). Cross-validating item parameter estimation in adaptive testing. In . A. Boorsma, M. A. J. van Duijn, and T. A. B. Snijders (Eds.) (pp. 205-219), Essays on item response theory. New York: Springer.
. (2000). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 149–162). Dendrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
. (2000). Detecting person misfit in adaptive testing using statistical process control techniques. In Computer adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 201-219). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
. (2000). Detecting person misfit in adaptive testing using statistical process control techniques. In . W. J. van der Linden, and C. A. W. Glas (Editors). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (2000). Detecting test-takers who have memorized items in computerized-adaptive testing and muti-stage testing: A comparison. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). Detection of known items in adaptive testing with a statistical quality control method. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 373-389.
. (2000). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items (Research Report 00-01). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2000). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing (Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Methods Research Report No 391). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (2000). The development of a computerized version of Vandenberg's mental rotation test and the effect of visuo-spatial working memory loading. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 3938.
. (2000). Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.
. (2000). Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Research Report 2000-8). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
. (2000). Effects of nonequivalence of item pools on ability estimates in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
ba00-01.pdf (656.37 KB). (2000). Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.
. (2000). Estimating Item Parameters from Classical Indices for Item Pool Development with a Computerized Classification Test. (No. Research Report 2000-4). Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc.
. (2000). Estimating item parameters from classical indices for item pool development with a computerized classification test (ACT Research 2000-4). Iowa City IA, ACT, Inc.
. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
. (2000). ETS finds flaws in the way online GRE rates some students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, a47.
. (2000). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.
. (2000). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Unpublished manuscript.
. (2000). From simulation to application: Examinees react to computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. New Orleans, April 2000.
. (2000). The GRE computer adaptive test: Operational issues. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 75-99). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
. (2000). The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 131-151.
. (2000). Implementing the computer-adaptive sequential testing (CAST) framework to mass produce high quality computer-adaptive and mastery tests. In Symposium paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
. (2000). An integer programming approach to item bank design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 139-150.
. (2000). An investigation of approaches to computerizing the GRE subject tests (GRE Board Professional Report No 93-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 00-4). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2000). Item calibration and parameter drift. In . W. J. van der linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp.183-199). Norwell MA: Kluwer Academic.
. (2000). Item exposure control in computer-adaptive testing: The use of freezing to augment stratification. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 40, 28-52.
. (2000). Item pools. In . Wainer, H. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: a primer. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2000). Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Medical Care, 38, II28-II42.
. (2000). Item selection and ability estimation in adaptive testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
. (2000). La distribution dchantillonnage en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux rgles darrt : selon lerreur type et selon le nombre ditems administrs [Sampling distribution of the proficiency estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping.. Doctoral thesis, Montreal: University of Montreal.