Green, B. F. (1970). Comments on tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp. 184-197). New York: Harper and Row.

Green, B. F. (2011). A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(2), 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080

Green, B. F. (2011). A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080

McGlohen, M. K., Chang, H. - H., & Wills, J. T.. (2004). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

McGlohen, M., & Chang, H. - H.. (2008). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. Behavioral Research Methods , 40, 808-21. presented at the Aug.

Steele, J. A., Binnie, C. A., & Cooper, W. A.. (1978). Combining auditory and visual stimuli in the adaptive testing of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 115-122.

Ward, W. C., Kline, R. G., & Flaugher, J.. (1986). College Board computerized placement tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86-29). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Ward, W. C. (1988). The College Board computerized placement tests: An application of computerized adaptive testing. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 271-282.

Stenson, H., Graves, P., Gardiner, J., & Dally, L.. (1991). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.

Tatsuoka, K. K. (1986). A cognitive error diagnostic adaptive testing system. In . the 28th ADCIS International Conference Proceedings. Washington DC: ADCIS.

Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., Weissman, A., & Cook, R. J.. (2014). Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Computerized Adaptive Testing: Two New Item-Selection Methods That Incorporate Response Times. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(4), 59-76. doi:10.7333/1412-0204059

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2003). Cognitive CAT in foreign language assessment. In Proceedings 11th International PEG Conference. Powerful ICT Tools for Learning and Teaching, PEG '03, CD-ROM, 2003.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., & Bleiler, T.. (2005). A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.

Hutt, M. L. (1947). A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.

Robin, F., Xing, D., Scrams, D., & Potenza, M.. (2000). Classification accuracy and test security for a computerized adaptive mastery test calibrated with different IRT models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Eggen, T. (2007). Choices in CAT models in the context of educattional testing. In GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the June 7, 2007, St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admission Council.

Eggen, T. (2007). Choices in CAT models in the context of educational testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Hontangas, P., Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Wise, S. L.. (2000). The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.

Krass, I. A. (2000). Change in distribution of latent ability with item position in CAT sequence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education in New Orleans. LA.

Robin, F. (2000). CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Geranpayeh, A. (2001). CB BULATS: Examining the reliability of a computer based test using test-retest method. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, Issue 5, July 2001, pp.

Wainer, H.,, & Eignor, D. R.. (2000). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (2001). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (1997). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1986). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1987). CATS, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 185-202.

Magis, D., & Raîche, G.. (2011). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482

Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2008). CAT-MD: Computerized adaptive testing on mobile devices. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 3, 13-20.

Segall, D. O. (1994). CAT-GATB simulation studies. San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Sticha, P. J., & Barber, G.. (2003). CAT-ASVAB prototype Internet delivery system: Final report (FR-03-06). Arlington VA: Human Resources Rsearch Organization.

Moreno, K. E.,, & Segall, D. O.. (1992). CAT-ASVAB precision. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, 1, 22-26.

Moreno, K. E. (1997). CAT-ASVAB operational test and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and . R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 199-205). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Wise, L. L., Curran, L. T., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). CAT-ASVAB cost and benefit analyses. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 227-236). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Hol, A. M. (2006). A CAT with personality and attitude. Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.

Imai, S. (2017). Is CAT Suitable for Automated Speaking Test?. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Gershon, R. C. (1994). CAT software system [computer program. Chicago IL: Computer Adaptive Technologies.

Guo, F. (2007). CAT Security: A practitioner’s perspective. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Thomasson, G. L. (1998). CAT Item exposure control: New evaluation tools, alternate methods and integration into a total CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Hsu, Y., Thompson, T. D., & Chen, W. - H.. (1998). CAT item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gershon, R. C. (1989). CAT administrator [Computer program]. Chicago: Micro Connections.

Stahl, J., Gershon, R. C., & Bergstrom, B.. (1999). CAT administration of language placement exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Stahl, J., Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (2000). CAT administration of language placement examinations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 292-302.

Luecht, R. M. (1998). CASTISEL [Computer software]. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.

McBride, J. R., & Cooper, R. R.. (1997). CAST 5 for Windows users' guide. Contract No. "MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., Stocking, M., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computerized adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report 93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., Stocking, M. L., Way, W. D., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (1998). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-07). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.

McBride, J. R. (2003). Can We Assess Pre-K Kids With Computer-Based Tests: STAR Early Literacy Data. In Presentation to the 33rd Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.. San Antonio TX.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T. Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D.. (2001). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T., Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D.. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.

Rocklin, T. R., Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T. L.. (1996). Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T. R., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T.. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.

Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Cella, D., & Von Roenn, J.. (2003). Can an item response theory-based pain item bank enhance measurement precision?. Clinical Therapeutics, 25, D34-D36.

Spray, J. A., Parshall, C. G., & Huang, C. - H.. (1997). Calibration of CAT items administered online for classification: Assumption of local independence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (1977). Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.

Krass, I. A., & Williams, B.. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using nonparametric and adjusted marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.