Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is [Clear All Filters]
. (1947). A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.
. (2005). A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.
. (2003). Cognitive CAT in foreign language assessment. In Proceedings 11th International PEG Conference. Powerful ICT Tools for Learning and Teaching, PEG '03, CD-ROM, 2003.
. (2014). Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Computerized Adaptive Testing: Two New Item-Selection Methods That Incorporate Response Times. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(4), 59-76. doi:10.7333/1412-0204059
. (1986). A cognitive error diagnostic adaptive testing system. In . the 28th ADCIS International Conference Proceedings. Washington DC: ADCIS.
. (1991). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.
. (1988). The College Board computerized placement tests: An application of computerized adaptive testing. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 271-282.
. (1986). College Board computerized placement tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86-29). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1978). Combining auditory and visual stimuli in the adaptive testing of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 115-122.
. (2008). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. Behavioral Research Methods , 40, 808-21. presented at the Aug.
. (2004). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
mcgl04-01.pdf (781.41 KB). (2011). A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(2), 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080
. (2011). A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080
. (1970). Comments on tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp. 184-197). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1989). Commercial applications of computerized adaptive testing. In C.E. Davis Chair, Computerized Adaptive Testing–Military and Commercial Developments Ten Years Later: Symposium conducted at the Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association (524-529). San Antonio, TX.
. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.
. (1997). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 using a clinical sample. In Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Symposium and Recent Developments in the use of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. Minneapolis MN.
. (2008). Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 5-24. doi:10.1177/0013164407305592
. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.
. (1991). Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.
. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.
. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report No 95-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 98-38). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1995). Comparability studies for the GRE CAT General Test and the NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (1980). A comparative evaluation of two Bayesian adaptive ability estimation procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Catholic University of America.
go80-02.pdf (762.83 KB). (1980). A comparative evaluation of two Bayesian adaptive ability estimation procedures with a conventional test strategy. Catholic University of America, Washington DC.
. (1999). A comparative study of ability estimates from computer-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.
. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.
. (1998). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Research Report Series 98-3, Iowa City: American College Testing.
. (1998). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa , Iowa City IA.
. (2001). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.
. (1998). Comparing and combining dichotomous and polytomous items with SPRT procedure in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
la98-01.pdf (374.46 KB). (1994). Comparing computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests: The influence of examinee achievement locus of control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2006). Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.
. (2006). Comparing Methods of Assessing Differential Item Functioning in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245–264. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00015.x
. (2009). Comparing methods to recalibrate drifting items in computerized adaptive testing. In American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.
Recalibrating Drifting Items in CAT MS.docx (543.3 KB). (2015). Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 144-154. doi:10.1177/0146621614559517
. (2013). Comparing the Performance of Five Multidimensional CAT Selection Procedures With Different Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0146621612455687
. (2002). Comparing three item selection approaches for computerized adaptive testing with content balancing requirement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
le02-01.pdf (225.92 KB). (2006). The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.
. (1986). Comparison and equating of paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive tests of achievement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (2012). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903
. (1981). A comparison of a Bayesian and a maximum likelihood tailored testing procedure. Research Report 81-2. Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.
. (1981). A comparison of a maximum likelihood and a Bayesian estimation procedure for tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Los Angeles CA.
. (1979). A comparison of a standard and a computerized adaptive paradigm in Bekesy fixed-frequency audiometry. Journal of Auditory Research, 19, 1-22.
. (2009). Comparison of ability estimation and item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09diao.pdf (341.8 KB). (1988). A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
ki88-01.pdf (42.27 KB). (2009). Comparison of adaptive Bayesian estimation and weighted Bayesian estimation in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09chen.pdf (307.42 KB). (2005). A comparison of adaptive mastery testing using testlets with the 3-parameter logistic model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
ja05-01.pdf (644.06 KB). (1996). A comparison of adaptive self-referenced testing and classical approaches to the measurement of individual change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
ki80-04.pdf (1.86 MB). (1989). A comparison of an expert systems approach to computerized adaptive testing and an IRT model. Unpublished manuscript (submitted to American Educational Research Journal).
. (1978). A comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood scoring in a simulated stradaptive test. Unpublished Masters thesis, St. Mary’s University of Texas, San Antonio TX.
. (2009). Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419–440.
. (2009). Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419-440. doi:10.1177/0146621608327801
. (1995). A comparison of classification agreement between adaptive and full-length test under the 1-PL and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1993). A comparison of computer adaptive test administration methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
. (2002). A comparison of computer mastery models when pool characteristics vary. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
sm02-01.pdf (691.36 KB). (1992). A comparison of computerized adaptive and paper-and-pencil versions of the national registered nurse licensure examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (2007). Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat07kim-kang.pdf (346.06 KB)