Ruiz, B., Fitz, P. A., Lewis, C., & Reidy, C.. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.

Rulison, K.,, & Loken, E.. (2009). I've fallen and I can't get up: can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(2), 83-101.

Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023

Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023

Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M.. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.

Samejima, F. (2000). Some considerations for improving accuracy of estimation of item characteristic curves in online calibration of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Samejima, F. (1990). Validity study in multidimensional latent space and efficient computerized adaptive testing (Final Report R01-1069-11-004-91). Knoxville TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.

Samejima, F. (1976). The graded response model of latent trait theory and tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 5-17). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Samejima, F. (1998). Some considerations for eliminating biases in ability estimation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Samejima, F. (2003). Criterion item characteristic curve function for evaluating the differential weight procedure adjusted to on-line item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCME. Chicago IL.

Samejima, F. (2007). Nonparametric online item calibration. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. .

Samejima, F. (1975). Behavior of the maximum likelihood estimate in a simulated tailored testing situation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City.

Samejima, F. (2001). Effective use of simulated data in an on-line item calibration in practical situations of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Samejima, F. (2001). Efficient on-line item calibration using a nonparametric method adjusted to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Samejima, F. (1977). A Use of the Information Function in Tailored Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 233-247.

Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.

Sands, W. A., & Gade, P. A.. (1983). An application of computerized adaptive testing in U. S. Army recruiting. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 10, 87-89.

Sapinkopf, R. C. (1977). A computer adaptive approach to the measurement of personality variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore.

Sari, H. Ibrahim, & Raborn, A.. (2018). What Information Works Best?: A Comparison of Routing Methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 499-515. doi:10.1177/0146621617752990

Scalise, K., & Wilson, M.. (2007). Bundle models for computerized adaptive testing in e-learning assessment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Schaeffer, G., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report No 95-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 98-38). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., Mills, C. N., & Durso, R.. (1995). The introduction and comparability of the computer-adaptive GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report 88-08ap; Educational Testing Service Research Report 95-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M., & Golub-Smith, M. L.. (1993). Introduction of a computer adaptive GRE General test (Research Report 93-57). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.

Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N.. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schartz, M. (1986). Measuring up in an individualized way with CAT-ASVAB: Considerations in the development of adaptive testing pools. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Franciso CA.

Schinoff, R. B., & Stead, L.. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing program at Miami-Dade Community College, South Campous. In Laguna Hill CA: League for Innovation in the community College.

Schmidt, F. L., & Urry, V. W.. (1976). Item parameterization procedures for the future. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 107-112.). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F.. (1978). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 265-273.

Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F.. (1977). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation (PB-276 748). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Schmitt, T. A., Sass, D. A., Sullivan, J. R., & Walker, C. M.. (2010). A Monte Carlo Simulation Investigating the Validity and Reliability of Ability Estimation in Item Response Theory with Speeded Computer Adaptive Tests. International Journal of Testing, 10, 230-261. doi:10.1080/15305058.2010.488098

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Schneider, R. J., McLellan, R. A., Kantrowitz, T. M., Houston, J. S., & Borman, W. C.. (2009). Criterion-related validity of an innovative CAT-based personality measure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M.. (1999). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing (LSAC Computerized Testing Report 97-01). Newtown, PA: LSAC.

Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M.. (1997). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.

Schnipke, D. L.,, & Green, B. F.. (1995). A comparison of item selection routines in linear and adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 227-242.

School-Renaissance-Institute,. (2001). The Development of STAR Early Literacy: A report of the School Renaissance Institute. Madison, WI: Author.

Schoonman, W. (1989). An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

Schoonman, W. (1989). An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. University of Groingen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Schouwstra, S. (2017). Adaptivity in a Diagnostic Educational Test. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Schreiber, M. D., Schneider, R. J., Schweizer, A., Beckmann, J. F., & Baltissen, R.. (2000). Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.

Schwall, A., & Sinar, E.. (2011). Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: Unique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Schwartz, C., Welch, G., Santiago-Kelley, P., Bode, R., & Sun, X.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing of diabetes impact: a feasibility study of Hispanics and non-Hispanics in an active clinic population. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1503-18. presented at the Nov.

Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1999). Response time feedback on computer-administered tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.

Segal, H. (1977). Operational Considerations in Implementing Tailored Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Kieckhaefer, W. F., Vicino, F. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Validation of the experimental CAT-ASVAB system. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (1995). The effects of item compromise on computerized adaptive test scores. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Orlando, FL.

Segall, D. O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331-354.

Segall, D. O. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing. In . Encyclopedia of social measurement. Academic Press.

Segall, D. O. (2010). Principles of Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 57-76). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Segall, D. O. (2002). Confirmatory item factor analysis using Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation with applications to online calibration in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Segall, D. O. (1988). A procedure for scoring incomplete adaptive tests in high stakes testing. Unpublished manuscript. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., & Hetter, D. H.. (1997). Item pool development and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 117-130). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Experiences and lessons learned. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Segall, D. O., & Davey, T. C.. (1995). Some new methods for content balancing adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Segall, D. O. (2000). Principles of multidimensional adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 53-73). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Segall, D. O. (2004). A sharing item response theory model for computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 439-460. presented at the Win.

Segall, D. O. (1994). CAT-GATB simulation studies. San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Segall, D. O. (2001). Measuring test compromise in high-stakes computerized adaptive testing: A Bayesian Strategy for surrogate test-taker detection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.