Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 40-48.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1999). Developing computerized adaptive tests for school children. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 93-115). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1990). Assessing the utility of item response models: Computerized adaptive testing. In A paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. Boston MA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & et. al.,. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: A four-year-old pilot study shows that CAT can work. Technological Horizons in Education, 16 (4), 73-76.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). A validity comparison of adaptive and conventional strategies for mastery testing (Research Report 81-3). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001

Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Some questions that must be addressed to develop and maintain an item pool for use in an adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1999). A procedure to compare conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). Assessing the utility of item response models: computerized adaptive testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 21-27.

Kingsbury, G. G. (2009). Adaptive item calibration: A process for estimating item parameters within a computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1989). Assessing the impact of using item parameter estimates obtained from paper-and-pencil testing for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2011). Creating a K-12 Adaptive Test: Examining the Stability of Item Parameter Estimates and Measurement Scales. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). An alternate-forms reliability and concurrent validity comparison of Bayesian adaptive and conventional ability tests (Research Report 80-5). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001

Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Item pool development and maintenance. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1999). A comparison of conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 40–48.

Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1986). Computerized adaptive testing: A pilot project. In . W. C. Ryan (ed.), Proceedings: NECC 86, National Educational Computing Conference (pp.172-176). Eugene OR: University of Oregon, International Council on Computers in Education.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1988). A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1996). Item review and adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Hauser, C.. (2004). Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1991). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection. Applied Measurement in Education.

Kingsbury, G. G. (1985). Adaptive self-referenced testing as a procedure for the measurement of individual change due to instruction: A comparison of the reliabilities of change estimates obtained from conventional and adaptive testing procedures. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3057.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.

Kingston, N. M., & Dorans, N. J.. (1984). Item Location Effects and Their Implications for IRT Equating and Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 147-154.

Kirisci, L. (1992). Estimation of ability level by using only observable quantities in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting if the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Kirisci, L., & Hsu, T. - C.. (1988). A predictive analysis approach to adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Kocalevent, R. D., Rose, M., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., et al.. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Problems in application of latent-trait models to tailored testing (Research Report 79-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology", (also presented at National Council on Measurement in Education, 1979: ERIC No. ED 177 196) note = ".

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1978). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1995). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using the successive intervals Rasch model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 976-990.

Koch, W. R., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Student attitudes toward tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Koch, W. R., & G., D. B.. (1986). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using partial credit scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1989). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 335-357.

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1985). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Koch, W. R., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1990). Computerized adaptive measurement of attitudes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 20-30.

Kocher, A. T. (1974). An empirical investigation of the stability and accuracy of flexilevel tests. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 03/1074, Chicago IL.

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.

Kopec, J. A., Badii, M., McKenna, M., Lima, V. D., Sayre, E. C., & Dvorak, M.. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: Validation of the CAT-5D-QOL. Spine, 33, 1384-90. presented at the May 20.

Koppel, N. B. (2000). Lagrangian relaxation for constrained curve-fitting with binary variables: Applications in educational testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1063.

Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J., Warejr, J., Sullivan, E., & Straus, W.. (2006). An evaluation of a patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing osteoarthritis impact. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 715-723.

Krass, I. A. (1998). Application of direct optimization for on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Krass, I. A., & Williams, B.. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using nonparametric and adjusted marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Krass, I. A. (1997). Getting more precision on computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the 62nd Annual meeting of Psychometric Society. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.

Krass, I. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Automated flawed item detection and graphical item used in on-line calibration of CAT-ASVAB. . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Krass, I. A. (2001). Application of score information for CAT pool development and its connection with "likelihood test information. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Krass, I. A. (2000). Change in distribution of latent ability with item position in CAT sequence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education in New Orleans. LA.

Krathwohl, D. R., & Huyser, R. J.. (1956). The sequential item test. American Psychologist, 2, 419.

Krathwohl, D. (1959). Progress report on the sequential item test. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University, Bureau of Educational Research.

Kreiter, C. D., Ferguson, K., & Gruppen, L. D.. (1999). Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment. Academic Medicine, 74, 1125-8. presented at the Oct.

Kreitzberg, C. B., Stocking, M.,, & Swanson, L.. (1978). Computerized adaptive testing: Principles and directions. Computers and Education, 2, 319-329.

Kreitzberg, C. B. (1978). Computerized adaptive testing: Principles and directions. Computers and Education, 2 (4), 319-329.

Kreitzberg, C. B., & Jones, D. J.. (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). The null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 327-345.