Longitudinal Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 447–468. doi:10.1111/jedm.12028
. (2013). Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Quality of Life Research, 18, 125-36. presented at the Feb.
. (2009). Local Dependence in an Operational CAT: Diagnosis and Implications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 201–223. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00061.x
. (2008). Linking the standard and advanced forms of the Ravens Progressive Matrices in both the paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive-testing formats. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 905-925.
. (1993). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 21-38.
. (2000). Letting the CAT out of the bag: Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33, 1378-83. presented at the May 20.
. (2008). Le testing adaptatif avec interprétation critérielle, une expérience de praticabilité du TAM pour l’évaluation sommative des apprentissages au Québec.. ( )Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 15-1 et 2.
. (1992). . (1908).
Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022
. (2017). . (1985).
Latent Class Analysis of Recurrent Events in Problem-Solving Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 478-498. doi:10.1177/0146621617748325
. (2018). Lagrangian relaxation for constrained curve-fitting with binary variables: Applications in educational testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1063.
. (2000). La Validez desde una óptica psicométrica [Validity from a psychometric perspective]. Acta Comportamentalia, 13, 9-20.
. (2005). La simulation d’un test adaptatif basé sur le modèle de Rasch [Simulation of a Rasch-based adaptive test]. Mesure et évaluation en éducation.
. (2002). ra02-04.pdf (29.76 KB)A Knowledge-Based Approach for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 530-558. doi:10.3102/1076998609336667
. (2009). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.
. (2004). JATT Special Issue on Adaptive Testing: Welcome and Overview. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. presented at the 05/2011. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology
. (2011). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (2009). I've fallen and I can't get up: can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(2), 83-101.
. (2009). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3
. (2017). itemusage_QLR.pdf (641.22 KB)Item times in computerized testing: A new differential information. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11 (Suppl. 1), 108-109.
. (1995). Item selection using an average growth approximation of target information functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 41-51.
. (1992). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.
. (2006). . (2009). ba09007.pdf (444.91 KB)
Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomously Scored Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 677-694. doi:10.1177/0146621618762748
. (2018). Item Selection Methods Based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classifying Respondents Into Multiple Levels. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 187-200. doi:10.1177/0146621613509723
. (2014). Item Selection in Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 778-793. doi:10.1177/0013164408324460
. (2009). Item selection in computerized classification testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 778-793.
. (2009). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.
. (1998). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 249-266.
. (2001). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Improving the a-stratified design with the Sympson-Hetter algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 376-392.
. (2002). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Improving the a-stratified design with the Sympson-Hetter algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 376-392.
. (2002). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 249-261.
. (1999). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 0013164418790634. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
. (2018). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 335-357. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
. (2019). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints for Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 20-36. doi:10.1177/0013164410387336
. (2011). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
. (2010). Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252
. (2020). Item Selection and Ability Estimation Procedures for a Mixed-Format Adaptive Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 305-326. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714686
. (2012). . (2000).
An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.
. (2005). Item response theory in computer adaptive testing: implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol, 50, 71-78.
. (2005). Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Medical Care, 38, II28-II42.
. (2000). On item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: The coming technical revolution in testing. Journal of College Admissions, 28, 9-16.
. (1983). . (2009).
An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.
. (2002). Item pool maintenance in the presence of item parameter drift. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 275-285.
. (1988). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629
. (2014). Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 259-275. doi:10.1177/0146621612473638
. (2013). Item Overexposure in Computerized Classification Tests Using Sequential Item Selection. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(12).
. (2012). v17n12.pdf (296.59 KB)Item Ordering in Stochastically Curtailed Health Questionnaires With an Observable Outcome. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(3), 38-66. doi:10.7333/1304-0103038
. (2013). Item Location Effects and Their Implications for IRT Equating and Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 147-154.
. (1984). v08n2p147.pdf (573.02 KB)Item exposure control in computer-adaptive testing: The use of freezing to augment stratification. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 40, 28-52.
. (2000). Item exposure control in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 793-811.
. (2008). Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.
. (2003). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.
. (1987). [Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.
. (2005). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241
. (2020). Item banks and their potential applications to health status assessment in diverse populations. Medical Care, 44, S189-S197. presented at the Nov.
. (2006).