Berger, M. P. F. (1994). A General Approach to Algorithmic Design of Fixed-Form Tests, Adaptive Tests, and Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(2), 141-153.

Berger, M. P. F. (1994). A general approach to algorithmic design of fixed-form tests, adaptive tests, and testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 141-153.

Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. - W., Chen, J. - H., & Liu, T. - C.. (2014). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494

Embretson, S. E. (1999). Generating items during testing: Psychometric issues and models. Psychometrika, 64, 407-433.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(3), 213-229.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 213-229.

Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.

DeWitt, L. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 104-107.

Revicki, D. A., & Cella, D. F.. (1997). Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 6, 595-600. presented at the Aug.

Born, S., & Frey, A.. (2017). Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 241-262. doi:10.1177/0013164416643744

Zheng, C., & Chang, H. - H.. (2016). High-Efficiency Response Distribution–Based Item Selection Algorithms for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 608-624. doi:10.1177/0146621616665196

Reckase, M., Ju, U., & Kim, S.. (2019). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001

Chuah, S. C., Drasgow, F., & Luecht, R.. (2006). How Big Is Big Enough? Sample Size Requirements for CAST Item Parameter Estimation. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 241-255. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_5

Tai, M. Him, Cooperman, A. W., DeWeese, J. N., & Weiss, D. J.. (2023). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032

Wang, S., Lin, H., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2016). Hybrid Computerized Adaptive Testing: From Group Sequential Design to Fully Sequential Design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 45–62. doi:10.1111/jedm.12100

Xiong, X. (2018). A Hybrid Strategy to Construct Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 630-643. doi:10.1177/0146621618762739

Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2002). Hypergeometric family and item overlap rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 67, 387-398.

Frey, A., & Seitz, N. - N.. (2011). Hypothetical use of multidimensional adaptive testing for the assessment of student achievement in PISA. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 503-522.

Frey, A., & Ehmke, T.. (2007). Hypothetischer Einsatz adaptiven Testens bei der Messung von Bildungsstandards in Mathematik [Hypothetical use of adaptive testing for the measurement of educational standards in mathematics] . . Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 169-184.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 40–48.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 40-48.

Muckle, T. J., Bergstrom, B. A., Becker, K., & Stahl, J. A.. (2008). Impact of altering randomization intervals on precision of measurement and item exposure. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(2), 160-167.

O'Neill, T., Lunz, M. E., & Thiede, K.. (2000). The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 131-151.

Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Impact of Test Design, Item Quality, and Item Bank Size on the Psychometric Properties of Computer-Based Credentialing Examinations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 5-21. doi:10.1177/0013164403258393

Wang, W. - C., & Chen, P. - H.. (2004). Implementation and Measurement Efficiency of Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 295-316. doi:10.1177/0146621604265938

Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001

van der Linden, W. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2003). Implementing content constraints in alpha-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 107-120.

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2008). Implementing Sympson-Hetter Item-Exposure Control in a Shadow-Test Approach to Constrained Adaptive Testing. International Journal of Testing, 8, 272-289. doi:10.1080/15305050802262233

Spoden, C., Frey, A., & Bernhardt, R.. (2018). Implementing Three CATs Within Eighteen Months. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(3), 38-55. presented at the 09/2018. doi:10.7333/1809-060338

Leary, L. F., & Dorans, N. J.. (1985). Implications for altering the context in which test items appear: A historical perspective on an immediate concern. Review of Educational Research, 55, 387-413.

Grodenchik, D. J. (2002). The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.

Cudeck, R., McCormick, D., & Cliff, N. A.. (1980). Implied orders tailored testing: Simulation with the Stanford-Binet. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 157-163.

Cudeck, R., McCormick, D. J., & Cliff, N.. (1980). Implied Orders Tailored Testing: Simulation with the Stanford-Binet. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4(2), 157-163.

Ying Cheng,. (2010). Improving Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing by Balancing Attribute Coverage: The Modified Maximum Global Discrimination Index Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 902-913. doi:10.1177/0013164410366693

Wang, C. (2014). Improving Measurement Precision of Hierarchical Latent Traits Using Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 452-477. doi:10.3102/1076998614559419

Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473-492.

Chakravarty, E. F., Bjorner, J. B., & Fries, J. F.. (2007). Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1426-31. presented at the Jun.

Makransky, G., Mortensen, E. L., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2012). Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112437756

Barnard, J. J. (2022). Improving Precision of CAT Measures. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Test-ing, 9(1), 1-7. presented at the 10/2022. doi:10.7333/2210-0901001

Vispoel, W. P. (1992). Improving the measurement of tonal memory with computerized adaptive tests. Psychomusicology, 11, 73-89.

Cetin-Berber, D. Duygu, Sari, H. Ibrahim, & Huggins-Manley, A. Corinne. (2019). Imputation Methods to Deal With Missing Responses in Computerized Adaptive Multistage Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0013164418805532

Van de Vijver, F. J. R.,, & Harsveld, M.. (1994). The incomplete equivalence of the paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of the General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 852-859.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2008). Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 493-513.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Incorporation Of Content Balancing Requirements In Stratification Designs For Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-270. doi:10.1177/0013164403251326

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2005). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.

Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T. R., & Wang, T.. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.

Elwood, D. L., & Griffin, H. R.. (1972). Individual intelligence testing without the examiner: reliability of an automated method. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 9-14.

Huitzing, H. A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2005). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.

Reckase, M. D. (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001

de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.

Patton, J. M., Ying Cheng,, Yuan, K. - H., & Diao, Q.. (2013). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727

Zheng, C., He, G., & Gao, C.. (2017). The Information Product Methods: A Unified Approach to Dual-Purpose Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 321 - 324. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617730392

Balajthy, E. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.

Elhan, A. H., Oztuna, D., Kutlay, S., Kucukdeveci, A. A., & Tennant, A.. (2008). An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders, 9, 166. presented at the Dec 18.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al.. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.

van der Linden, W. J., Veldkamp, B. P., & Reese, L. M.. (2000). An integer programming approach to item bank design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 139-150.

Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157

Reckase, M. D. (1974). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 208-212.

Chang, S. - H. (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.