Export 107 results:
Filters: Keyword is computerized adaptive testing [Clear All Filters]
Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.
. (1997). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.
. (1999). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.
. (2003). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
. (2019). Test design optimization in CAT early stage with the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 213-232.
. (2007). Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2518.
. (1992). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.
. (1984). Taylor approximations to logistic IRT models and their use in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 307-343.
. (2000). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185.
. (2004). . (2008).
Some New Developments in Adaptive Testing.pdf (544.66 KB)
![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
A simulation and comparison of flexilevel and Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 227-239.
. (1990). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 48-68.
. (1998). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.
. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017
. (2006). Siette: a web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.
. (2004). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.
. (1997). Research antecedents of applied adaptive testing. In , Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to practice (xviii., pp. 47-57). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.
. (1984). A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.
. (1989). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.
. (2005). A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.
. (2007). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
. (1991). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.
. (2002). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.
. (1999). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008
. (2022). Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in a certification or licensure context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 389-404.
. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 398-412.
. (1999). Multidimensional adaptive testing using the weighted likelihood estimation. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61, 4746.
. (2001). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 54, 2548.
. (1994). . (1998).
Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 29-41.
. (1998). Los tests adaptativos informatizados en la frontera del siglo XXI: Una revisión [Computerized adaptive tests at the turn of the 21st century: A review]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 183-216.
. (2000). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.
. (2006). Item selection in polytomous CAT. In , New developments in psychometrics (pp. 207–214). Tokyo, Japan: Psychometric Society, Springer.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
. (2010). An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.
. (2005). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.
. (2002). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.
. (2004). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
. (1991). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (1999). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (2024). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.
. (2005). Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.
. (2003). The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.
. (2002). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 40-48.
. (2008). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032
. (2023). . (1999).
. (2001).
Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.
. (2006). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2002). The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.
. (1994). . (2006).
An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.
. (2002). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
. (2002). The effect of population distribution and method of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 47-59.
. (1999). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
. (1987).