Sutherland, L. A., Campbell, M., Ornstein, K., Wildemuth, B., & Lobach, D.. (2001). Development of an adaptive multimedia program to collect patient health data. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 21, 320-324.

Laurier, M. (1999). The development of an adaptive test for placement in french. Studies in language testing, 10, 122-135.

Hart, D. L., & Wright, B. D.. (2002). Development of an index of physical functional health status in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 655-65. presented at the May.

Forkmann, T., Boecker, M., Norra, C., Eberle, N., Kircher, T., Schauerte, P., et al.. (2009). Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 186-97. presented at the May.

Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Chie, W. C., Conroy, T., Costantini, A., et al.. (2010). Development of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning dimension. Quality of Life Research , 20, 479-490.

Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2017). The Development of MST Test Information for the Prediction of Test Performances. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 570-586. doi:10.1177/0013164416662960

McBride, J. R. (2002). The Development of STAR Early Literacy. In Presentation to the 32rd Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.. Desert Springs CA.

School-Renaissance-Institute,. (2001). The Development of STAR Early Literacy: A report of the School Renaissance Institute. Madison, WI: Author.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2005). The development of the adaptive item language assessment (AILA) for mixed-ability students. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 643-650, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.

Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (1999). Development of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. In . F. Drasgow and J. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

De Beer, M. (2003). Development of the Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT). In Unpublished manuscript. .

Simms, L. J. (2002). DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF A COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE VERSION OF THE SCHEDULE FOR NONADAPTIVE AND ADAPTIVE PERSONALITY. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City Iowa.

Simms, L. J. (2003). Development, reliability, and validity of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 63, 3485.

Sijtsma, K. (2001). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.

Tatsuoka, K. K., & Tatsuoka, M. M.. (1997). Diagnostic adaptive testing: Effects of remedial instruction as empirical validation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 3-20.

Frey, A., & Carstensen, C. H.. (2009). Diagnostic classification models and multidimensional adaptive testing: A commentary on Rupp and Templin. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 7, 58-61.

Schreiber, M. D., Schneider, R. J., Schweizer, A., Beckmann, J. F., & Baltissen, R.. (2000). Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.

Xiao, B. (1990). Dichotomous search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Kubinger, K. D. (1989). Die Optimierung der Mebgenauikeit beim branched adaptiven Testen [Optimization of measurement precision for branched-adaptive testing. In . K. D. Kubinger (Ed.), Moderne Testtheorie Ein Abrib samt neusten Beitrgen [Modern test theory Overview and new issues] (pp. 187-218). Weinhem, Germany: Beltz.

Zwick, R., Thayer, D. T., & Wingersky, M.. (1994). DIF analysis for pretest items in computer-adaptive testing (Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 94-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wang, J., Weiss, D. J., & Wang, C.. (2017). DIF-CAT: Doubly Adaptive CAT Using Subgroup Information to Improve Measurement Precision. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Gu4FR06qM5EZNp_Ns0Kt3HzBqWAv3LPy

Pitkin, A. K., & Vispoel, W. P.. (2001). Differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 235-247.

Zwick, R. (1992). Differential item functioning analysis for computer-adaptive tests and other IRT-scored measures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Military Testing Association. San Diego CA.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and inverse problems of item pool design for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). Direct and Inverse Problems of Item Pool Design for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 533-547. doi:10.1177/0013164409332224

Bock, R. D. (1975). Discussion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 46-49. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Green, B. F. (1976). Discussion. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. pp. 118-119). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Linn, R. L. (1975). Discussion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 44-46. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Lord, F. M. (1976). Discussion. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 113-117). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Reckase, M. D. (1982). Discussion: Adaptive and sequential testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Waters, B. K. (1980). Discussion: Session 1. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 51-55). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Novick, M. R. (1980). Discussion: Session 3. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 140-143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.

Johnson, S. H. (1996). Dispelling myths about the new NCLEX exam. Recruitment, Retention, and Restructuring Report, 9, 6-7. presented at the Jan-Feb.

Nering, M. L. (1997). The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 115-127.

Mislevy, R. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). Does adaptive testing violate local independence?. Psychometrika, 65, 149-156.

Mislevy, R. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (1998). Does adaptive testing violate local independence? (Research Report 98-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Gershon, R. C., & Bergstrom, B.. (1995). Does cheating on CAT pay: Not. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E. S.. (2008). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.

Kang, H. - A., Zhang, S., & Chang, H. - H.. (2017). Dual-Objective Item Selection Criteria in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54, 165–183. doi:10.1111/jedm.12139

Cook, K. F., O'Malley, K. J., & Roddey, T. S.. (2005). Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag?. Health Services Research, 40, 1694-1711.

Ware, J. E., J., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M.. (1999). Dynamic health assessments: The search for more practical and more precise outcomes measures. Quality of Life Newsletter, 11-13.

Berg, S. R. (1996). Dynamic scaling: An ipsative procedure using techniques from computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 56, 5824.

Chen, J. - H., Chao, H. - Y., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2020). A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 182-196. doi:10.1177/0146621619843820

McBride, J. R. (1994). Early psychometric research in the CAT-ASVAB Project. In Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles. CA.

Fan, M., & Hsu, Y.. (1995). The effect of ability estimation for polytomous CAT in different item selection procedures. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Zwick, R. (1997). The effect of adaptive administration on the variability of the Mantel-Haenszel measure of differential item functioning. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 412-421.

Smits, N. (2016). On the effect of adding clinical samples to validation studies of patient-reported outcome item banks: a simulation study. Quality of Life Research, 25, 1635–1644. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1199-9

Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Lau, C. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Effect of altering passing score in CAT when unidimensionality is violated. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April, New York NY.

Guyer, R. D. (2008). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN.

Guyer, R. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Crichton, L. I. (1981). Effect of error in item parameter estimates on adaptive testing (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 06-B.

Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., & Hessinger, J.. (2003). Effect of extra time on GRE® Quantitative and Verbal Scores (Research Report 03-13). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing service.

Colvin, K., Keller, L. A., & Robin, F.. (2016). Effect of Imprecise Parameter Estimation on Ability Estimation in a Multistage Test in an Automatic Item Generation Context . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 4(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1608-040101

Ferdous, A. A., Plake, B. S., & Chang, S. - R.. (2007). The effect of including pretest items in an operational computerized adaptive test: Do different ability examinees spend different amounts of time on embedded pretest items?. Educational Assessment, 12, 161-173.

Gershon, R. C. (1996). The effect of individual differences variables on the assessment of ability for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57, 4085.

Reckase, M. D. (1975). The effect of item choice on ability estimation when using a simple logistic tailored testing model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on the decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (ACT Research Report Series 87-17). Iowa City IA: American College Testing.

Reckase, M. D. (1976). The effect of item pool characteristics on the operation of a tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Murray Hill NJ.

Halkitis, P. N. (1998). The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations. J Outcome Meas, 2, 97-122.