. (1979). Monte carlo evaluation of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 65-74.
. (1985). A structural comparison of conventional and adaptive versions of the ASVAB. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 305-322.
. (1977). TAILOR: A FORTRAN procedure for interactive tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 767-769.
. (1979). Monte Carlo Evaluation of Implied Orders As a Basis for Tailored Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(1), 65-74.
v3n1p065.pdf (543.67 KB). (2018). Evaluation of a New Method for Providing Full Review Opportunities in Computerized Adaptive Testing—Computerized Adaptive Testing With Salt. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 582-594. doi:10.1111/jedm.12193
. (2016). Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment: The State of the Field. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 3-21. doi:10.1177/0146621615590401
. (1994). Evaluation and implementation of CAT-ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles.
. (2016). Exploration of Item Selection in Dual-Purpose Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing: Based on the RRUM. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 625-640. doi:10.1177/0146621616666008
. (1999). Pretesting alongside an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (2000). Specific information item selection for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
. (1995). New algorithms for item selection and exposure control with computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (2006). Designing computerized adaptive tests. In . S.M. Downing and T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1997). Realistic simulation procedures for item response data. In In T. Miller (Chair), High-dimensional simulation of item response data for CAT research. Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
. (2002). Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In . C. N. Mills, M. T. Potenza, and J. J. Fremer (Eds.), Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments (pp. 165-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (1998). Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In Paper presented at an Educational Testing Service-sponsored colloquium entitled “Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments. ” Philadelphia PA.
. (1996). Constructing adaptive tests to parallel conventional programs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.
. (1997). Developing and scoring an innovative computerized writing assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 21-41.
. (1998). Evaluating and insuring measurement precision in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
. (1996). Person-fit indices and their role in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (2004). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185.
. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133
. (2001). An examination of testlet scoring and item exposure constraints in the Verbal Reasoning section of the MCAT. In .
daxx-01.pdf (652.37 KB). (2002). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
da02-01.pdf (1.79 MB). (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.
. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
da03-01.pdf (619.88 KB). (2003). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 24-42.
. (2008). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 1-17.
. (2002). Feasibility and acceptability of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for fatigue monitoring in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 11(7), 134.
. (2005). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model. Pearson Educational Measurement Research Report 05-01.
. (2003). Item exposure constraints for testlets in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 335-356.
. (2001). An examination of testlet scoring and item exposure constraints in the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. MCAT Monograph Series: Association of American Medical Colleges.
. (2000). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
. (2012). On the Reliability and Validity of a Numerical Reasoning Speed Dimension Derived From Response Times Collected in Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 245-263. doi:10.1177/0013164411408412
. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three parameter model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 3148.
. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.
. (1992). A comparison of the partial credit and graded response models in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 17-34.
. (1989). A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model in computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 789-805.
. (1985). ALPHATAB: A lookup table for Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 326.
. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Washington DC.
. (1990). A simulation and comparison of flexilevel and Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 227-239.
. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.
. (1992). The Nominal Response Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 327-343.
v16n4p327.pdf (1.45 MB). (2000). Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT): Technical Manual. Pretoria: UNISA.
. (2003). Development of the Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT). In Unpublished manuscript. .
debe03-02.pdf (562.16 KB). (2007). Use of CAT in dynamic testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat2007debeer.pdf (133.49 KB). (2003). A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.
debe03-01.pdf (390.1 KB). (2002). Utility of Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT) scores in predicting academic performance of bridging students: A comparison with other predictors. In Paper presented at the 5th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology Congress. Pretoria, South Africa.
. (2000). The construction and evaluation of a dynamic computerised adaptive test for the measurement of learning potential. Unpublished D. Litt et Phil dissertation. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
. (2000). Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT): User's Manual. Pretoria: UNISA.
. (2017). Using Automated Item Generation in a Large-scale Medical Licensure Exam Program: Lessons Learned. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08.2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=14N8hUc8qexAy5W_94TykEDABGVIJHG1h
. (1991). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive testing system. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
de74-1.pdf (2.67 MB). (2020). Multidimensional Test Assembly Using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming: An Application of Kullback–Leibler Information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 17-32. doi:10.1177/0146621619827586
. (2022). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008
. (2001). a-stratified computerized adaptive testing with unequal item exposure across strata. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x
. (2003). To stratify or not: An investigation of CAT item selection procedures under practical constraints. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
de03-01.pdf (185.22 KB). (2010). Stratified and maximum information item selection procedures in computer adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202-226.
. (2008). Developing a progressive approach to using the GAIN in order to reduce the duration and cost of assessment with the GAIN short screener, Quick and computer adaptive testing. In Joint Meeting on Adolescent Treatment Effectiveness . presented at the 2008, Washington D.C., USA.
. (2005). A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.