Building a statistical foundation for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
. (1996). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.
. (2003). Identify the lower bounds for item sharing and item pooling in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). Sequential estimation in variable length computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 121, 249-264.
. (2004). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211–222.
. (1999). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa , Iowa City IA.
. (1998). A model for score maximization within a computerized adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. New York NY.
. (1996). a-Stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-341.
. (2001). Effects of changes in the examinees’ ability distribution on the exposure control methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). ch01-02.pdf (694.64 KB)Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 543-561. doi:10.1177/0146621618813113
. (2019). Test-score comparability, ability estimation, and item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). Hypergeometric family and item overlap rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 67, 387-398.
. (2002). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1995). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-41.
. (2001). Redeveloping the exposure control parameters of CAT items when a pool is modified. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ch02-02.pdf (1.09 MB)A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Research Report Series 98-3, Iowa City: American College Testing.
. (1998). . (2010).
Rescuing CAT by fixing the problems. In National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (2005). To weight or not to weight – balancing influence of initial and later items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ch02-01.pdf (251.46 KB) . (2000).
a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
. (1999). A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(3), 213-229.
. (1996). v20n3p213.pdf (1.91 MB) . (2002).
Comparison of adaptive Bayesian estimation and weighted Bayesian estimation in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09chen.pdf (307.42 KB)Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.
. (2005). ffects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on CAT using the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1995). The effect of population distribution and method of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.
. (2008). A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 182-196. doi:10.1177/0146621619843820
. (2020). A new approach to simulation studies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). ch01-01.pdf (250.96 KB) . (1999).
A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.
. (1997). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.
. (1998). An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
. (2017). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.
. (2005). Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495
. (2005). Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 5-15. doi:10.1177/0146621613513065
. (2015). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). A Procedure for Controlling General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 393-409. doi:10.1177/0146621610367788
. (2010). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494
. (2014). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.
. (2007). Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.
. (2008). Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252
. (2020). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ch03-01.pdf (238.7 KB)The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). . (2009).
The Effect of Upper and Lower Asymptotes of IRT Models on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 551-565. doi:10.1177/0146621615585850
. (2015). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003). a-Stratified Computerized Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Calibration Error. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 260-283. doi:10.1177/0013164414530719
. (2015). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003). The modified maximum global discrimination index method for cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07cheng.pdf (171.07 KB)Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
. (2000). Two-phase item selection procedure for flexible content balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological. Measurement, 3, 467–482.
. (2007).