Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. In Paper presented at the conference “Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement: Exploring the Current State and the Future of Item Response Theory. Item Banks, and Computer-Adaptive Testing,” Bethesda MD.
. (2004). ch04-01.pdf (180.23 KB)Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.
. (2003). Performance of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing: Further explorations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans , LA.
. (2000). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa , Iowa City IA.
. (1998). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
. (1999). Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 543-561. doi:10.1177/0146621618813113
. (2019). Multi-stage CAT with stratified design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
. (1997). Sequential estimation in variable length computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 121, 249-264.
. (2004). a-Stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-341.
. (2001). Assessing CAT security breaches by the item pooling index. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). . (1997).
A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Research Report Series 98-3, Iowa City: American College Testing.
. (1998). Building a statistical foundation for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
. (1996). Rescuing CAT by fixing the problems. In National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (2005). Hypergeometric family and item overlap rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 67, 387-398.
. (2002). . (2000).
A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(3), 213-229.
. (1996). v20n3p213.pdf (1.91 MB)a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-41.
. (2001). Identify the lower bounds for item sharing and item pooling in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211–222.
. (1999). . (2010).
Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential design, and computerized adaptive testing. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). . (2002).
The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.
. (2005). A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 182-196. doi:10.1177/0146621619843820
. (2020). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.
. (2007). The effect of population distribution and method of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). . (1999).
An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
. (2017). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ch03-01.pdf (238.7 KB)A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.
. (2008). Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495
. (2005). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.
. (1997). Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 5-15. doi:10.1177/0146621613513065
. (2015). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). ffects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). A Procedure for Controlling General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 393-409. doi:10.1177/0146621610367788
. (2010). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on CAT using the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1995). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using the rating scale model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 422-439.
. (1997). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.
. (2000). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494
. (2014). Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252
. (2020). A new approach to simulation studies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). ch01-01.pdf (250.96 KB)A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.
. (1998). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2004). Comparison of adaptive Bayesian estimation and weighted Bayesian estimation in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09chen.pdf (307.42 KB)Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.
. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.
. (2008). Two-phase item selection procedure for flexible content balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological. Measurement, 3, 467–482.
. (2007). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-83. presented at the May.
. (2009). Constraints-weighted information method for item selection of severely constrained computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (2006). The Effect of Upper and Lower Asymptotes of IRT Models on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 551-565. doi:10.1177/0146621615585850
. (2015). Constraint-weighted a-stratification for computerized adaptive testing with nonstatistical constraints: Balancing measurement efficiency and exposure control. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 35-49.
. (2009). . (2009).
a-Stratified Computerized Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Calibration Error. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 260-283. doi:10.1177/0013164414530719
. (2015). The modified maximum global discrimination index method for cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07cheng.pdf (171.07 KB)