. (2001).
Updated item parameter estimates using sparse CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.
. (2000). A search procedure to determine sets of decision points when using testlet-based Bayesian sequential testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (1996). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1055–1063. presented at the Apr. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1821-8
. (2018). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
On the effect of adding clinical samples to validation studies of patient-reported outcome item banks: a simulation study. Quality of Life Research, 25, 1635–1644. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1199-9
. (2016). Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: A simulation study. Psychiatry Research. presented at the Jan 3.
. (2011). Stochastic Curtailment of Questionnaires for Three-Level Classification: Shortening the CES-D for Assessing Low, Moderate, and High Risk of Depression. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 22-36. doi:10.1177/0146621615592294
. (2016). Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: A simulation study. Psychiatry Research, 188(1), 147–155.
. (2011). A Comparison of Computerized Classification Testing and Computerized Adaptive Testing in Clinical Psychology. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(2), 19-37. doi:10.7333/1302-0102019
. (2013). Computerized adaptive testing: Revolutionizing academic assessment. Community College Journal, 65 (1), 32-35.
. (1994). . (1993).
A computer simulation study of tailored testing strategies for objective-based instructional programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 139-158.
. (1977). Implementing Three CATs Within Eighteen Months. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(3), 38-55. presented at the 09/2018. doi:10.7333/1809-060338
. (2018). Calibration of CAT items administered online for classification: Assumption of local independence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
. (1997). The effect of item parameter estimation error on the decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (ACT Research Report Series 87-17). Iowa City IA: American College Testing.
. (1987). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: 3-PLM vs. 1PLM (and UIRT versus MIRT). In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis, MN.
. (1995). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using a computerized test. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 21, 405-414.
. (1996). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the national meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). . (1997).
The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
. (1987). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using an adaptive test. In Unpublished manuscript. (.
. (1993). Multiple-category classification using a sequential probability ratio test (Research report 93-7). Iowa City: American College Testing.
. (1993). The selection of items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1984). . (2000).
CAT administration of language placement exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). . (1997).
Multistage Testing: Widely or Narrowly Applicable?. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 257-260. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_6
. (2006). Adaptive testing with the multi-unidimensional pairwise preference model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.
. (2002). Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Ideal Point Model. International Journal of Testing, 11, 231-247. doi:10.1080/15305058.2011.561459
. (2011). Application of an IRT ideal point model to computer adaptive assessment of job performance. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organization Psychology. Dallas TX.
. (1998). Combining auditory and visual stimuli in the adaptive testing of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 115-122.
. (1978). Test-taking strategies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Evaluation of methods for the use of underutilized items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
. (1998). Test-taking strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Validity. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.
. (1991). . (1984).
CAT-ASVAB prototype Internet delivery system: Final report (FR-03-06). Arlington VA: Human Resources Rsearch Organization.
. (2003). ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Concerto 5 Open Source CAT Platform: From Code to Nodes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=11eu1KKILQEoK5c-CYO1P1AiJgiQxX0E0
. (2017). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Tech Rep. No. ERIC ED389710). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.
. (1988). Modern computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Joint Statistics and Psychometric Seminar. Princeton NJ.
. (1993). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 96-34). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). A method for severely constrained item selection in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 277-292.
. (1993). Methods of controlling the exposure of items in CAT. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 163-182). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (2000). Some considerations in maintaining adaptive test item pools (Research Report 88-33-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1988). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-75.
. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1995). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1998). A method for severely constrained item selection in adaptive testing. Educational Testing Service Research Report (RR-92-37): Princeton NJ.
. (1992). An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 365-389.
. (1997). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Research Report RR-88-28-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1988). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.
. (1997). A new method of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1995). The application of an automated item selection method to real data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 167-176.
. (1993). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three models (RR-96-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). An exploration of potentially problematic adaptive tests. Research Report 02-05).
. (2002). An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 365-389.
. (1996). Two simulated feasibility studies in computerized adaptive testing (RR-84-15). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1984).