Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
E
Lu, Y., & Robin, F.. (2003). Evaluating a new approach to detect aberrant responses in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
E
Carlson, S. (2000). ETS finds flaws in the way online GRE rates some students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, a47.
Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
Glas, C. A. W., van der Linden, W. J., & Geerlings, H.. (2010). Estimation of the Parameters in an Item-Cloning Model for Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 289-314). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Sympson, J. B. (1977). Estimation of latent trait status in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we77-01.pdf (3.15 MB)
Sykes, R., & Ito, K.. (1995). Estimation of item difficulty from restricted CAT calibration samples. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education in San Francisco.
Kirisci, L. (1992). Estimation of ability level by using only observable quantities in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting if the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Sympson, J. B. (1980). Estimating the reliability of adaptive tests from a single test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston.
PDF icon sy81-01.pdf (7.42 MB)
Divgi, D. R. (1989). Estimating Reliabilities of Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 145-149.
PDF icon v13n2p145.pdf (655.37 KB)
Crotts, K. M., Zenisky, A. L., Sireci, S. G., & Li, X.. (2013). Estimating Measurement Precision in Reduced-Length Multi-Stage Adaptive Testing . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(4), 67-87. doi:10.7333/1309-0104067
Revuelta, J. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.
Reese, C. M. (1993). Establishing time limits for the GRE computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., & Amoss, K. E.. (1994). Establishing the comparability of the NCLEX using CAT with traditional NCLEX examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
Wang, T. (1997). Essentially unbiased EAP estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
PDF icon wa97-01.pdf (224.35 KB)
Wang, T., Lau, C., & Hanson, B. A.. (1998). Essentially unbiased Bayesian estimates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
Stoloff, P. H. (1985). Equivalence of scores from computerized adaptive and paper-and-pencil ASVAB tests (No. CNR 113) (p. 100). Alexandria, VA. USA: Center for Naval Analysis.
Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.
McBride, J. R. (1995). Equating the computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco. CA.
McBride, J. R., Corpe, V. A., & Wing, H.. (1987). Equating the computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.
Segall, D. O., & Carter, G.. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Issues and approach. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
Segall, D. O. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Experiences and lessons learned. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
Segall, D. O. (1997). Equating the CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 181-198). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
van der Linden, W. J. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.
Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1995). Equating computerized adaptive certification examinations: The Board of Registry series of studies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2014). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (1999). An enhanced stratified computerized adaptive testing design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
PDF icon le99-01.pdf (477.89 KB)
Wang, C., Zheng, C., & Chang, H. - H.. (2014). An Enhanced Approach to Combine Item Response Theory With Cognitive Diagnosis in Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 358–380. doi:10.1111/jedm.12057
Thompson, T. (2002). Employing new ideas in CAT to a simulated reading test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon to02-01.pdf (215.33 KB)
Ben-Porath, Y. S., Roper, B. L., & Butcher, J. N.. (1990). An empirical study of the computer adaptive MMPI-2. In Paper presented at the 25th Annual Symposium on recent developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2. Minneapolis MN.
Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1994). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon be73-04.pdf (2.45 MB)
Kreitzberg, C. B., & Jones, D. J.. (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lee, S. (2017). An Empirical Simulation Study Using mstR for MST Designs. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Waters, B. K. (1976). An empirical investigation of Weiss' stradaptive testing model. In . C. L. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 54-63.). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission.
PDF icon wa75-01.pdf (575.27 KB)
PDF icon v01n1p141.pdf (725.15 KB)
Kocher, A. T. (1974). An empirical investigation of the stability and accuracy of flexilevel tests. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 03/1074, Chicago IL.
Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). An empirical investigation of computer-administered pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 74-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon la74-03.pdf (2.97 MB)
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1977). An empirical evaluation of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon cl77048.pdf (779.84 KB)
Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 75-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon la75-01.pdf (1.73 MB)
Rocklin, T. R., & O’Donnell, A. M.. (1991). An empirical comparison of self-adapted and maximum information item selection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ki02-01.pdf (133.01 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.
Zwick, R. (1998). An empirical Bayes approach to Mantel-Haenszel DIF analysis: Theoretical development and application to CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Pages