Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
E
Wise, S. L. (1997). Examinee issues in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
PDF icon daxx-01.pdf (652.37 KB)
Swygert, K. (1998). An examination of item-level response times from an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Urbana IL.
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2001). An examination of item selection rules by stratified CAT designs integrated with content balancing methods. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
PDF icon le01-01.pdf (295.52 KB)
Bowles, R. (2001). An examination of item review on computer adaptive tests. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia.
Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
PDF icon bo01-01.pdf (324.67 KB)
Davis, L. L., Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., Chiang, C., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2000). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
Rudner, L. M. (2002). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
PDF icon ru02-01.pdf (45.1 KB)
Rudner, L. M. (2009). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09rudner.pdf (202.22 KB)
Walker, C. M., & Ackerman, T. A.. (1999). An examination of conditioning variables in DIF analysis in a computer adaptive testing environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Evaluations of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing using simulations (Technical Report No. 4). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2006). Evaluation parameters for computer adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37(No 2), 261-278.
Vicino, F. L., & Hardwicke, S. B.. (1984). An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Vicino, F. L., & Hardwicke, S. B.. (1984). An evaluation of the utility of large scale computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Paterson, J. J. (1962). An evaluation of the sequential method of testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 (7-A), 4257.
Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (2004). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.
Thompson, N., & Stoeger, J.. (2017). Evaluation of Parameter Recovery, Drift, and DIF with CAT Data. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F7HCZWD28Q97sCKFIJB0Yps0H66NPeKq
Steffen, M., & Liu, M.. (1998). Evaluation of methods for the use of underutilized items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
PDF icon v03n4p495.pdf (1.5 MB)
French, B. F., & Thompson, T. T.. (2003). The evaluation of exposure control procedures for an operational CAT. . In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon fr03-01.pdf (198.89 KB)
Hardwicke, S., Vicino, F., McBride, J. R., & Nemeth, C.. (1984). Evaluation of computerized adaptive testing of the ASVAB. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, unpublished manuscript.
McBride, J. R. (1979). An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 21st Military Testing Association Conference. SanDiego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Economides, A. A., & Roupas, C.. (2007). Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.
McBride, J. R., & Hogan, P. F.. (1992). Evaluation of alternative operational concepts. In . Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Hogan, P. F., McBride, J. R., & Curran, L. T.. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.
Reese, L. M., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1996). An evaluation of a two-stage testlet design for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Ito, K., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D.. (2009). An evaluation of a new procedure for computing information functions for Bayesian scores from computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09Ito.pdf (570.19 KB)
Fliege, H., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., & Klapp, B. F.. (2009). Evaluation of a computer-adaptive test for the assessment of depression (D-CAT) in clinical application. International Journal for Methods in Psychiatric Research, 18, 233-236. presented at the Feb 4.
E
Curran, L. T., & Wise, L. L.. (1994). Evaluation and implementation of CAT-ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles.
Sympson, J. B. (1975). Evaluating the results of computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 26-31. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon sy75-01.pdf (448.16 KB)
Puhan, G., & Gierl, M.. (2003). Evaluating the comparability of English- and French-speaking examinees on a science achievement test administered using two-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon pu03-01.pdf (567.05 KB)
Thomasson, G. L. (2003). Evaluating stability of online item calibrations under varying conditions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Hetter, R. D., Segall, D. O., & Bloxom, B. M.. (1997). Evaluating item calibration medium in computerized adaptive testing. In . W.A. Sands, B.K. Waters and J.R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 161-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Webb, N. L.. (2015). Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094
Lu, Y., Pitoniak, M., Rizavi, S., Way, W. D., & Steffan, M.. (2003). Evaluating computerized adaptive testing design for the MCAT with realistic simulated data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon lu03-01.pdf (984.95 KB)
Zhang, J., & Lu, T.. (2003). Evaluating computer-based test security by generalized item overlap rates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
Wang, T., & Kolen, M. J.. (1997). Evaluating comparability in computerized adaptive testing: A theoretical framework with an example. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Evaluating and insuring measurement precision in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Pages