Adaptive mastery testing using the Rasch model and Bayesian sequential decision theory (Research Report 98-15). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 603-26.
. (2010). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). Item calibration and parameter drift. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (1999). . (2003).
Adaptive Mastery Testing Using a Multidimensional IRT Model. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 409-431). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Quality control of on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-03). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.
. (1988). Item calibration and parameter drift. In . W. J. van der linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp.183-199). Norwell MA: Kluwer Academic.
. (2000). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (No. 98-01) (p. 28). Enschede, The Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Univeersity of Twente.
. (1998). Estimation of the Parameters in an Item-Cloning Model for Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 289-314). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Adaptive mastery testing using a multidimensional IRT model and Bayesian sequential decision theory (Research Report 00-06). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2000). Item Parameter Estimation and Item Fit Analysis. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 269-288). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). MML and EAP estimation in testlet-based adaptive testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 271-287). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
. (2000). An implemented theoretical framework for a common European foreign language adaptive assessment. In . Proceedings ICODL 2005, 3rd ternational Conference on Open and Distance Learning 'Applications of Pedagogy and Technology',339-350,Greek Open University, Patra, Greece.
. (2005). State-of-the-art and adaptive open-closed items in adaptive foreign language assessment. In . Proceedings 4th Hellenic Conference with ternational Participation: Informational and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens,747-756.
. (2004). Cognitive CAT in foreign language assessment. In Proceedings 11th International PEG Conference. Powerful ICT Tools for Learning and Teaching, PEG '03, CD-ROM, 2003.
. (2003). The development of the adaptive item language assessment (AILA) for mixed-ability students. In . Proceedings E-Learn 2005 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 643-650, Vancouver, Canada, AACE, October 2005.
. (2005). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.
. (2011). Generating Rationales to Support Formative Feedback in Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1O5KDFtQlDLvhNoDr7X4JO4arpJkIHKUP
. (2017). Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing A New Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 29-39. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.29
. (2008). Computer Adaptive-Attribute Testing.pdf (444.58 KB)Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788
. (2018). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.
. (2008). gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)Development of a computerized adaptive test for depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(11), 1105-1112. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.14
. (2012). Walking the Tightrope: Using Better Content Control to Improve CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Gialluca Content Control in CAT.pdf (131.56 KB)Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1979). gi79-06.pdf (2.72 MB)CAT software system [computer program. Chicago IL: Computer Adaptive Technologies.
. (1994). The ABCs of Computerized Adaptive Testing. In . T. M. Wood and W. Zhi (Eds.), Measurement issues and practice in physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human kinetics.
. (2004). FastCAT – Customizing CAT Administration Rules to Increase Response Efficiency. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oPJV-x0p9hRmgJ7t6k-MCC1nAoBSFM1w
. (2017). Does cheating on CAT pay: Not. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1995). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 304-314.
. (2010). Issues in Trait Range Coverage for Patient Reported Outcome Measure CATs - Extending the Ceiling for Above-average Physical Functioning. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZC02F-dIyYovEjzpeuRdoXDiXMLFRuKb
. (2017). CAT administrator [Computer program]. Chicago: Micro Connections.
. (1989). Individual differences in computer adaptive testing: Anxiety, computer literacy, and satisfaction. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
. (1991). . (2005).
. (2005).
The effect of individual differences variables on the assessment of ability for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57, 4085.
. (1996). CB BULATS: Examining the reliability of a computer based test using test-retest method. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, Issue 5, July 2001, pp.
. (2001). ge01-01.pdf (455.94 KB)A review of item exposure control strategies for computerized adaptive testing developed from 1983 to 2005. Journal of Technology,Learning, and Assessment,, 5(8).
. (2007). ge07-01.pdf (319.09 KB)Evaluation parameters for computer adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37(No 2), 261-278.
. (2006). An application of computer adaptive testing with communication handicapped examinees. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 23-35.
. (1986). Monitoring item calibrations from data yielded by an adaptive testing procedure. Educational Research Quarterly, 10, 9-12.
. (1985). Assessing mathematics achievement with a tailored testing program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.
. (1982). . (2004).
Multidimensional adaptive testing for mental health problems in primary care. Medical Care, 40, 812-23. presented at the Sep.
. (2002). ga02812.pdf (131.16 KB) . (2000).
Fairness in computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Applications of CAT in admissions to higher education in Israel: Twenty-two years of experience. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09gafni.pdf (325.12 KB)A study of psychologically optimal level of item difficulty. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 65, 446-53. presented at the Feb.
. (1995). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061-2066. presented at the Sep.
. (2009). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.
. (2005). Adaptive testing without a computer. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, Nov 1981, 11, 74-75 (Ms. No. 2350). AFHRL Technical Report 80-66.
. (1981). Bayesian adaptation during computer-based tests and computer-guided practice exercises. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 89-114.
. (1989). A comparison of an expert systems approach to computerized adaptive testing and an IRT model. Unpublished manuscript (submitted to American Educational Research Journal).
. (1989). A comparison of three decision models for adapting the length of computer-based mastery tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(4), 479-513.
. (1990). EXSPRT: An expert systems approach to computer-based adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Vol. San Francisco.).
. (1989). Computerized adaptive mastery tests as expert systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 187-213.
. (1992). Computerized adaptive mastery tests as expert systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(2), 187-213.
. (1992). Hypothetischer Einsatz adaptiven Testens bei der Messung von Bildungsstandards in Mathematik [Hypothetical use of adaptive testing for the measurement of educational standards in mathematics] . . Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 169-184.
. (2007). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.
. (2004).