Doebler, A. (2012). The Problem of Bias in Person Parameter Estimation in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 255-270. doi:10.1177/0146621612443304

Davison, M. L., Semmes, R., Huang, L., & Close, C. N.. (2012). On the Reliability and Validity of a Numerical Reasoning Speed Dimension Derived From Response Times Collected in Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 245-263. doi:10.1177/0013164411408412

Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932

Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932

Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J.. (2012). Termination Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Tests: Do Variable-Length CATs Provide Efficient and Effective Measurement?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1212-0101001

Makransky, G., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2013). The applicability of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing to cognitive ability measurement in organizational assessment. International Journal of Testing, 13(2), 123-139. doi:10.1080/15305058.2012.672352

Makransky, G., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2013). The Applicability of Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Ability Measurement in Organizational Assessment. International Journal of Testing, 13, 123-139. doi:10.1080/15305058.2012.672352

Mao, X., & Xin, T.. (2013). The Application of the Monte Carlo Approach to Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 482-496. doi:10.1177/0146621613486015

Yao, L. (2013). Comparing the Performance of Five Multidimensional CAT Selection Procedures With Different Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0146621612455687

Smits, N., & Finkelman, M. D.. (2013). A Comparison of Computerized Classification Testing and Computerized Adaptive Testing in Clinical Psychology. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(2), 19-37. doi:10.7333/1302-0102019

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CAT Systems Based on Different Measurement Models for Testlets. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 113-135. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434

Leroux, A. J., Lopez, M., Hembry, I., & Dodd, B. G.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802

Ito, K., & Segall, D. O.. (2013). A Comparison of Four Methods for Obtaining Information Functions for Scores From Computerized Adaptive Tests With Normally Distributed Item Difficulties and Discriminations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(5), 88-107. doi:10.7333/1312-0105088

Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Boughton, K. A.. (2013). Deriving Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 99-122. doi:10.1177/0146621612463422

Crotts, K. M., Zenisky, A. L., Sireci, S. G., & Li, X.. (2013). Estimating Measurement Precision in Reduced-Length Multi-Stage Adaptive Testing . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(4), 67-87. doi:10.7333/1309-0104067

Patton, J. M., Ying Cheng,, Yuan, K. - H., & Diao, Q.. (2013). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727

Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157

Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., He, Y., & Lai, A. M.. (2013). Item Ordering in Stochastically Curtailed Health Questionnaires With an Observable Outcome. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(3), 38-66. doi:10.7333/1304-0103038

Han, K. T. (2013). Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 259-275. doi:10.1177/0146621612473638

Pohl, S. (2013). Longitudinal Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 447–468. doi:10.1111/jedm.12028

Wang, C. (2013). Mutual Information Item Selection Method in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Short Test Length. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 1017-1035. doi:10.1177/0013164413498256

Taherbhai, H., & Seo, D.. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000

Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L.. (2013). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720

Frey, A., Seitz, N. - N., & Kröhne, U.. (2013). Reporting differentiated literacy results in PISA by using multidimensional adaptive testing. . In Research on PISA.. Dodrecht: Springer.

Wang, C., Fan, Z., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J. A.. (2013). A Semiparametric Model for Jointly Analyzing Response Times and Accuracy in Computerized Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 381-417. doi:10.3102/1076998612461831

van der Linden, W. J., & Xiong, X.. (2013). Speededness and Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 418-438. doi:10.3102/1076998612466143

Veldkamp, B. P., Matteucci, M., & de Jong, M. G.. (2013). Uncertainties in the Item Parameter Estimates and Robust Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 123-139. doi:10.1177/0146621612469825

Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2013). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 563-582. doi:10.1177/0146621613488642

Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., Weissman, A., & Cook, R. J.. (2014). Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Computerized Adaptive Testing: Two New Item-Selection Methods That Incorporate Response Times. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(4), 59-76. doi:10.7333/1412-0204059

He, W., Diao, Q., & Hauser, C.. (2014). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503

Brossman, B. G., & Guille, R. A.. (2014). A Comparison of Multi-Stage and Linear Test Designs for Medium-Size Licensure and Certification Examinations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(2), 18-36. presented at the 02-2014. doi:10.7333/1402-0202018

Crabbe, M., & Vandebroek, M.. (2014). Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Random Weights Linear Logistic Test Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-431. doi:10.1177/0146621614533987

Yan, D., von Davier, A. A., & Lewis, C.. (2014). Computerized multistage testing: Theory and applications. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.

Belov, D. I. (2014). Detecting Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Information Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(3), 37-58. doi:10.7333/1410-0203037

Sinharay, S., Wan, P., Whitaker, M., Kim, D. - I., Zhang, L., & Choi, S. W.. (2014). Determining the Overall Impact of Interruptions During Online Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 419–440. doi:10.1111/jedm.12052

Wang, C., Zheng, C., & Chang, H. - H.. (2014). An Enhanced Approach to Combine Item Response Theory With Cognitive Diagnosis in Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 358–380. doi:10.1111/jedm.12057

Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2014). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545

Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. - W., Chen, J. - H., & Liu, T. - C.. (2014). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494

Wang, C. (2014). Improving Measurement Precision of Hierarchical Latent Traits Using Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 452-477. doi:10.3102/1076998614559419

He, W., & Reckase, M. D.. (2014). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629

van Groen, M. M., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2014). Item Selection Methods Based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classifying Respondents Into Multiple Levels. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 187-200. doi:10.1177/0146621613509723

Yao, L. (2014). Multidimensional CAT Item Selection Methods for Domain Scores and Composite Scores With Item Exposure Control and Content Constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 18–38. doi:10.1111/jedm.12032

Cox, M. A. A. (2014). A Numerical Investigation of the Recovery of Point Patterns With Minimal Information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 329-335. doi:10.1177/0146621613516186

Nydick, S. W. (2014). The Sequential Probability Ratio Test and Binary Item Response Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 203-230. doi:10.3102/1076998614524824

Zhang, J. (2014). A Sequential Procedure for Detecting Compromised Items in the Item Pool of a CAT System. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 87-104. doi:10.1177/0146621613510062

Kalinowski, K. E., Natesan, P., & Henson, R. K.. (2014). Stratified Item Selection and Exposure Control in Unidimensional Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Two-Dimensional Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 563-576. doi:10.1177/0146621614536768

Yao, L., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2014). Using Multidimensional CAT to Administer a Short, Yet Precise, Screening Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 614-631. doi:10.1177/0146621614541514

Wise, S. L. (2014). The Utility of Adaptive Testing in Addressing the Problem of Unmotivated Examinees. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(1), 1-17. doi:10.7333/1401-02010001

Sinharay, S., Wan, P., Choi, S. W., & Kim, D. - I.. (2015). Assessing Individual-Level Impact of Interruptions During Online Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 80–105. doi:10.1111/jedm.12064

Cheng, Y., Patton, J. M., & Shao, C.. (2015). a-Stratified Computerized Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Calibration Error. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 260-283. doi:10.1177/0013164414530719

Seo, D. Gi, & Weiss, D. J.. (2015). Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 954-978. doi:10.1177/0013164415575147

Oswald, F. L., Shaw, A., & Farmer, W. L.. (2015). Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 144-154. doi:10.1177/0146621614559517

Kim, S., Moses, T., & Yoo, H. (Henry). (2015). A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70–79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063

Wyse, A. E., & Albano, A. D.. (2015). Considering the Use of General and Modified Assessment Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.1002921

Cheng, Y., & Liu, C.. (2015). The Effect of Upper and Lower Asymptotes of IRT Models on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 551-565. doi:10.1177/0146621615585850

Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Webb, N. L.. (2015). Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094

Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001

Liu, O. Lydia, Bridgeman, B., Gu, L., Xu, J., & Kong, N.. (2015). Investigation of Response Changes in the GRE Revised General Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 1002-1020. doi:10.1177/0013164415573988

Kaplan, M., de la Torre, J., & Barrada, J. R.. (2015). New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 167-188. doi:10.1177/0146621614554650

Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z.. (2015). Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 5-15. doi:10.1177/0146621613513065