Introduction and history. In . In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A Primer (pp. 1 - 21). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). The introduction and comparability of the computer-adaptive GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report 88-08ap; Educational Testing Service Research Report 95-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1995). Introduction. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.
. (1985). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.
. (1991). The interpretation and application of multidimensional item response theory models; and computerized testing in the instructional environment: Final Report (Research Report ONR 89-2). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program.
. (1989). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the National Conference on the Us of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
. (1973). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 208-212.
. (1974). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157
. (2013). Integrating stratification and information approaches for multiple constrained CAT. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2001). le01-02.pdf (321.58 KB)An integer programming approach to item bank design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 139-150.
. (2000). Innovative Items for Computerized Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 215-230). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In . In W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer (in press).
. (2002). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (1999). Innovations in computer-based ability testing: Promise, problems and perils. In . In Hakel, M.D. (Ed.) Beyond multiple choice: Alternatives to traditional testing for selection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1998). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.
. (2007). An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders, 9, 166. presented at the Dec 18.
. (2008). Information theoretic approaches to item selection. In Paper presented at the 13th international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Sardinia, Italy.
. (2003). . (2002).
The Information Product Methods: A Unified Approach to Dual-Purpose Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 321 - 324. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617730392
. (2017). An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). be77-07.pdf (1.97 MB)The influence of item characteristics and administration position on CAT Scores. In Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association. Hudson Valley, NY, October 26, 2001.
. (2001). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727
. (2013). Influence of fallible item parameters on test information during adaptive testing (Tech Rep 83-15). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1983). The influence of examinee test-taking behavior motivation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1995). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.
. (1992). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (2024). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.
. (2005). Individually tailored testing: Discussion. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.198-200). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1970). Individualized testing on the basis of the Rasch model. In . In J. Th. Van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak, and D. N. M. de Gruijter (Eds.). Psychometrics for educational debates. New York: Wiley.
. (1980). Individualized testing in the classroom. In . Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Elsevier Science 295-299.
. (1995). Individualized testing by Bayesian estimation. Seattle: University of Washington, Bureau of Testing Project 0171-177.
. (1971). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory (RB-72-50). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1972). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory. In . D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II). San Francisco: Freeman.
. (1974). Individualized assessment of differential abilities. In Paper presented at the 77th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
. (1969). Individual intelligence testing without the examiner: reliability of an automated method. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 9-14.
. (1972). Individual differences in item selection in self adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1989). Individual differences in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1993). Individual differences in computer adaptive testing: Anxiety, computer literacy, and satisfaction. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
. (1991). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, adaptive, and self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AEARA. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
. (1994). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.
. (2005). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT’s item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
. (2003). li03-02.pdf (417.96 KB)Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.
. (2003). Incorporation Of Content Balancing Requirements In Stratification Designs For Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-270. doi:10.1177/0013164403251326
. (2003). Incorporating the Sympson-Hetter exposure control method into the a-stratified method with content blocking. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
. (2002). yi02-01.pdf (386.73 KB)Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 493-513.
. (2008). Incorporating post-administration item response revision into a CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1992). Incorporating decision consistency into Bayesian sequential testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.
. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1999). Incomplete orders and computerized testing. In C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 18-23). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). cl75-01.pdf (372.58 KB)The incomplete equivalence of the paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of the General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 852-859.
. (1994). Imputation Methods to Deal With Missing Responses in Computerized Adaptive Multistage Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0013164418805532
. (2019). An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
. (2017). Improving the quality of music aptitude tests through adaptive administration of items. In Paper presented at Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musicality: The Seashore Symposium. University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.
. (1997). Improving the measurement of tonal memory with computerized adaptive tests. Psychomusicology, 11, 73-89.
. (1992). Improving the measurement of musical ability through adaptive testing. In . G. Hayes (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International ADCIS Conference (pp. 221-228). Bellingham WA: ADCIS.
. (1987). Improving Precision of CAT Measures. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Test-ing, 9(1), 1-7. presented at the 10/2022. doi:10.7333/2210-0901001
. (2022). Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112437756
. (2012). Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1426-31. presented at the Jun.
. (2007).