. (2010). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test Computerized Adaptive Test. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 151-166). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2007). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test® computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat07rudner.pdf (134.53 KB). (2018). Implementing Three CATs Within Eighteen Months. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(3), 38-55. presented at the 09/2018. doi:10.7333/1809-060338
. (1985). Implications for altering the context in which test items appear: A historical perspective on an immediate concern. Review of Educational Research, 55, 387-413.
. (1999). Implications from information functions and standard errors for determining preferred normed scales for CAT and P and P ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (2002). The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.
. (1978). Implied orders as a basis for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 6). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.
. (1980). Implied orders tailored testing: Simulation with the Stanford-Binet. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 157-163.
. (1980). Implied Orders Tailored Testing: Simulation with the Stanford-Binet. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4(2), 157-163.
v04n2p157.pdf (650.25 KB). (1990). Important issues in CAT. In . H. Wainer et al., Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2010). Improving Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing by Balancing Attribute Coverage: The Modified Maximum Global Discrimination Index Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 902-913. doi:10.1177/0013164410366693
. (1995). Improving individual differences measurement with item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. In . D. Lubinski and R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 49-79). Palo Alto CA: Davies-Black Publishing.
. (2014). Improving Measurement Precision of Hierarchical Latent Traits Using Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 452-477. doi:10.3102/1076998614559419
. (1982). Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473-492.
v06n4p473.pdf (2.74 MB). (2007). Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1426-31. presented at the Jun.
. (2012). Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112437756
. (2022). Improving Precision of CAT Measures. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Test-ing, 9(1), 1-7. presented at the 10/2022. doi:10.7333/2210-0901001
. (1987). Improving the measurement of musical ability through adaptive testing. In . G. Hayes (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International ADCIS Conference (pp. 221-228). Bellingham WA: ADCIS.
. (1992). Improving the measurement of tonal memory with computerized adaptive tests. Psychomusicology, 11, 73-89.
. (1997). Improving the quality of music aptitude tests through adaptive administration of items. In Paper presented at Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musicality: The Seashore Symposium. University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.
. (2017). An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
. (2019). Imputation Methods to Deal With Missing Responses in Computerized Adaptive Multistage Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0013164418805532
. (1994). The incomplete equivalence of the paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of the General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 852-859.
. (1976). Incomplete orders and computerized testing. In C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 18-23). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
cl75-01.pdf (372.58 KB). (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). Incorporating decision consistency into Bayesian sequential testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.
. (1992). Incorporating post-administration item response revision into a CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (2008). Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 493-513.
. (2002). Incorporating the Sympson-Hetter exposure control method into the a-stratified method with content blocking. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
yi02-01.pdf (386.73 KB). (2003). Incorporation Of Content Balancing Requirements In Stratification Designs For Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-270. doi:10.1177/0013164403251326
. (2003). Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.
. (2003). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT’s item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
li03-02.pdf (417.96 KB). (2005). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.
. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
. (1993). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, adaptive, and self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AEARA. Atlanta GA.
. (1991). Individual differences in computer adaptive testing: Anxiety, computer literacy, and satisfaction. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
. (1993). Individual differences in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1989). Individual differences in item selection in self adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1972). Individual intelligence testing without the examiner: reliability of an automated method. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 9-14.
. (1969). Individualized assessment of differential abilities. In Paper presented at the 77th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
. (1974). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory. In . D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II). San Francisco: Freeman.
. (1972). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory (RB-72-50). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1971). Individualized testing by Bayesian estimation. Seattle: University of Washington, Bureau of Testing Project 0171-177.
. (1995). Individualized testing in the classroom. In . Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Elsevier Science 295-299.
. (1980). Individualized testing on the basis of the Rasch model. In . In J. Th. Van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak, and D. N. M. de Gruijter (Eds.). Psychometrics for educational debates. New York: Wiley.
. (1970). Individually tailored testing: Discussion. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.198-200). New York: Harper and Row.
. (2005). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.
. (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.
. (1995). The influence of examinee test-taking behavior motivation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1983). Influence of fallible item parameters on test information during adaptive testing (Tech Rep 83-15). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (2013). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727
. (2001). The influence of item characteristics and administration position on CAT Scores. In Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association. Hudson Valley, NY, October 26, 2001.
. (1977). An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
be77-07.pdf (1.97 MB). (2017). The Information Product Methods: A Unified Approach to Dual-Purpose Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 321 - 324. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617730392
. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.
. (2003). Information theoretic approaches to item selection. In Paper presented at the 13th international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Sardinia, Italy.
. (2008). An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders, 9, 166. presented at the Dec 18.
. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.